<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg030.perseus-eng2:60</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg030.perseus-eng2:60</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg030.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg030.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="60"><p><label>TYCHIADES</label>
It seems to me, Simon, that you have treated of
everything without being in any degree inadequate

<pb n="v.3.p.315"/>

to your art. You are not deficient in preparation, as
you said you were; on the contrary, you are as
thoroughly trained as one could be by the greatest
masters. And now I want to know whether the very
name of Parasitic is not discreditable.
</p><p><label>SIMON</label>
Note my answer and see if you think itissatisfactory,
and try on your part to answer my question as you
think best. Come, now, what about the noun from
which it is derived? To what did the ancients
apply it?
To food.
</p><p><label>TYCHIADES</label><label>SIMON</label>
And what about the simple verb, does it not
mean “to eat”?
</p><p><label>TYCHIADES</label>
Yes.
</p><p><label>SIMON</label>
Then we have admitted, have we not, that to be a
parasite is nothing but to eat with someone else ?
</p><p><label>TYCHIADES</label>
) Why, Simon, that is the very thing which seems
discreditable !

</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>