<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg030.perseus-eng2:21</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg030.perseus-eng2:21</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg030.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg030.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="21"><p><label>TYCHIADES</label>
Quite true.
</p><p><label>SIMON</label>
Moreover, Tychiades, it seems to me that the other
arts stand in need of this one, but this one does not
stand in need of any other.<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.3.p.269.n.1"><p>This point is not dwelt upon here because the author proposes to use it with great effect later at the expense of philosophy (§$ 31 ff.). </p></note>
<label>TYCHIADES</label>
But, I say, don’t you think that people who take
what belongs to someone else do wrong ?
</p><p><label>SIMON</label>
Certainly.
</p><p><label>TYCHIADES</label>
How is it, then, that the parasite is the only one
that does not do wrong in taking what belongs to
someone else?

</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>