<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg025.perseus-eng2:17-20</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg025.perseus-eng2:17-20</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg025.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg025.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="17"><p><label>TRUTH</label>
You others go: I do not-need to hear what I
have long known all about.
</p><p><label>PHILOSOPHY</label>
But it would help us, Truth, if you should join in
the trial and give us information on each point.
</p><p><label>TRUTH</label>
Then shall I bring along these two waitingwomen, who are in very close sympathy with me?
</p><p><label>PHILOSOPHY</label>
Yes, indeed, as many as you wish.

<pb n="v.3.p.29"/>

<label>TRUTH</label>
Come with us, Liberty and Free-speech, so that
we may be able to rescue this poor creature, our
admirer, who is facing danger for no just reason.
You, Investigation, may stay where you are.
</p><p><label>FRANKNESS</label>
Hold, my lady: let him come too, if anyone is to
come. Those whom I shall have to fight to-day are
none of your ordinary cattle, but pretentious
fellows, hard to argue down, always finding some
loophole or other, so that Investigation is necessary.
</p><p><label>INVESTIGATION</label>
Yes, most necessary: and you had better take
Proof along too. :
</p><p><label>TRUTH</label>
Come, all of you, since you appear to be necessary
to the case.
</p></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg025.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="18"><p><label>PLATO</label>
Do you see that? He is suborning Truth against
us, Philosophy.
</p><p><label>PHILOSOPHY</label>
Then you, Plato and Chrysippus and Aristotle,
are afraid that she, Truth, may tell some lie ‘in his
behalf?
</p><p><label>PLATO</label>
It isn’t that, but he is terribly unprincipled and
smooth-tongued, so that he will seduce her.

<pb n="v.3.p.31"/>

<label>PHILOSOPHY</label>
Have no fear. No injustice will be done while we
have Justice here with us.

</p></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg025.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="19"><p>
Let us go up, then.
But tell me, what is your name ?
</p><p><label>FRANKNESS</label>
Mine?  Frankness, son of Truthful, son of
Renowned Investigator.
</p><p><label>PHILOSOPHY</label>
And your country?
</p><p><label>FRANKNESS</label>
I am a Syrian, Philosophy, from the banks of the
Euphrates. But what of that? I know that some
of my opponents here are just as foreign-born as I:
but in their manners and culture they are not like
men of Soli or Cyprus or Babylon or Stageira.<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.3.p.31.n.1"><p>Although they were born there: Chrysippus in Soli, Aristotle in Stageira. No philosopher. mentioned: by name in this piece came from Cyprus or from Babylon, and these allusions are not clear. Perhaps Lucian has in mind Zeno of Citium and Poseidonius of Seleucia on the Tigris.  </p></note> Yet
as far as you are concerned it would make no difference even if a man’s speech were foreign, if only his
way of thinking were manifestly right and just.

</p></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg025.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="20"><p><label>PHILOSOPHY</label>
True: it was a needless question, to be sure. But
what is your calling? That at least is worth
knowing.
</p><p><label>FRANKNESS</label>
Iam a bluff-hater, cheat-hater, liar-hater, vanityhater, and hate all that sort of scoundrels, who are
very numerous, as you know.
</p><p><label>PHILOSOPHY</label>
Heracles! You follow a hateful calling !


<pb n="v.3.p.33"/>

<label>FRANKNESS</label>
You are right. You see, in fact, how many have
come to dislike me and how I am imperilled because
I follow it.
However, I am very well up in the opposite
calling, too: I mean the one with love for a base ;
for I am a truth-lover, a beauty-lover, a simplicitylover, and a lover of all else that is kindred to love.
But there are very few who deserve to have this
calling practised upon them, while those who come
under the other and are closer akin to hatefulness
number untold thousands. So the chances are
that by this time I have lost my skill in the pne
calling for lack of practice, but have become very
expert in the other.
</p><p><label>PHILOSOPHY</label>
But that ought not to be so, for if a man can do
the one, they say, he can do the other. So do not
distinguish the two callings; they are but one,
though they seem two.
</p><p><label>FRANKNESS</label>
You know best as to that, Philosophy. For my
part, however, I am so-constituted as to hate rascals
and to commend and love honest men.

</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>