<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg024.perseus-eng5:22-24</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg024.perseus-eng5:22-24</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg024.perseus-eng5" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg024.perseus-eng5:" n="22"><p><label>Buyer</label> What else, now, do you claim to know?</p><p><label>Buyer</label> How clever!
</p><p><label>Chrysippos</label> The meshes of argument wherewith
I trip up my interlocutors and block their passage
and reduce them to silence by actually muzzling
them. The name of this faculty is the famous
syllogism.</p><p><label>Buyer</label> By Herkules, it is an irresistible, mighty
weapon, from your description.</p><p><label>Chrysippos</label> I will give you a specimen. Have
you a child?</p><p><label>Buyer</label> Certainly.</p><p><label>Chrysippos</label> If a crocodile should manage to
snatch it, finding it wandering too near the river,
and if, then, he should promise to restore it if you
could tell him truly whether he had determined


<pb n="p.75"/>


to give it back or not, what would you tell him
he had in mind?</p><p><label>Buyer</label> That is a difficult question, for I do not
see which answer would be the more likely to get
the child back. But do you, in Heaven's name,
answer for me, and save my child before he eats
him.</p><p><label>Chrysippos</label> Never fear, I will teach you other
things still more surprising.</p><p><label>Buyer</label> What sort of things?</p><p><label>Chrysippos</label> The Reaper, the Master, and, above
all, the Elektra, and the Veiled.</p><p><label>Buyer</label> What do you mean by the "Veiled," or
the "Elektra ?"</p><p><label>Chrysippos</label> Elektra is that famous person, the
daughter of Agamemnon, who at the same moment knows a thing and does not know it; for
when Orestes stands beside her, still incognito,
she knows, indeed, that Orestes is her brother,
but that this is Orestes she does not know. And
I will tell you about the "Veiled," too, a most extraordinary figure. Answer me, do you know your
father?</p><p><label>Buyer</label> Yes.</p><p><label>Chrysippos</label> Well, then, if I present some veiled
person to you and ask whether you know him,
what would you say?</p><p><label>Buyer</label> That I do not, of course.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg024.perseus-eng5:" n="23"><p><label>Chrysippos</label> And yet this very person was your


<pb n="p.76"/>



father! Therefore, if you do not know him, it is
plain you do not know your father.</p><p><label>Buyer</label> Not at all, for if I unveil him I shall
know the truth. However, what is the object of
your philosophy? What do you do when you
have reached the pinnacle of virtue?</p><p><label>Chrysippos</label> I shall then be occupied with the
first things in the order of nature-riches, I mean,
and health, and such like things. But before
that one must needs toil much, sharpening his
sight on books in fine print, taking notes, and filling himself with solecisms aand uncouth phrases.
Most important of all, it is not permitted to become a sage until you have drunk hellebore three
times in succession.</p><p><label>Buyer</label> This is all very noble in you and extremely manly. But what are we to say when a
man, who has already drunk the hellebore and arrived at virtue, turns money - lender at fifty per
cent., for I see this belongs to your principles too?</p><p><label>Chrysippos</label> By all means. The sage is the only
man fit to lend money; for since ratiocination
is his peculiar function, and calculating ratios and
per cents. seems to be the next thing to ratiocinating, it follows from these premises that the
special business of the good man alone is to get
not only simple interest like other people, but
compound. For you know there are two sorts of
interest, one sort coming first, and the other second,


<pb n="p.77"/>

as it were the offspring of the first, and of
course you see what the syllogism has to say
about it if he gets the simple interest, he will
also get the compound, but he does get the simple interest, therefore he will also get the compound.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg024.perseus-eng5:" n="24"><p><label>Buyer</label> And must we say the same of the fees
you take for imparting your wisdom to young
men? Is it clear that the good man alone will
make money out of his virtue?</p><p><label>Chrysippos</label> You grasp the idea. It is not on
my own account that I take fees, but for the good
of the giver himself. For since one party in a
transaction must give and the other receive, I
train myself to receive and my pupil to give.</p><p><label>Buyer</label> It ought to be the other way about.
The young man ought to receive, and you, who
alone are rich, to give out.</p><p><label>Chrysippos</label> You are chaffing, fellow; but be
careful lest I let fly at you with the apodeiktic
syllogism.</p><p><label>Buyer</label> What are the frightful effects of the
weapon?</p><p><label>Chrysippos</label> Embarrassment, silence, confusion
of mind. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>