<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg031.perseus-eng2:37-56</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg031.perseus-eng2:37-56</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="edition" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg031.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="37"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> And whereas the body of the Heaven is visible, the Soul is herself invisible but partakes in reasoning and in harmony, <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="37"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="37a"/> having come into existence by the agency of the best of things intelligible and ever-existing as the best of things generated. Inasmuch, then, as she is a compound, blended of the natures of the Same and the Other and Being, these three portions, and is proportionately divided and bound together, and revolves back upon herself, whenever she touches anything which has its substance dispersed or anything which has its substance undivided she is moved throughout her whole being and announces what the object is identical with  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="37b"/> and from what it is different, and in what relation, where and how and when, it comes about that each thing exists and is acted upon by others both in the sphere of the Becoming and in that of the ever-uniform. And her announcement, being identically true concerning both the Other and the Same, is borne through the self-moved without speech or sound; and whenever it is concerned with the sensible, and the circle of the Other moving in straight course proclaims it to the whole of its Soul, opinions and beliefs arise which are firm and true; and again, when it is concerned with the rational,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="37c"/> and the circle of the Same, spinning truly, declares the facts, reason and knowledge of necessity result. But should anyone assert that the substance in which these two states arise is something other than Soul, his assertion will be anything rather than the truth.

   <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>And when the Father that engendered it perceived it in motion and alive, a thing of joy to the eternal gods, He too rejoiced<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Note the play on <foreign xml:lang="greek">ἄγαλμα</foreign> <gloss>thing of joy</gloss> or <gloss>statue</gloss> and <foreign xml:lang="greek">ἠγάσθη</foreign> <gloss>rejoiced</gloss>.</note>; and being well-pleased He designed to make it resemble its Model  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="37d"/> still more closely. Accordingly, seeing that that Model is an eternal Living Creature, He set about making this Universe, so far as He could, of a like kind. But inasmuch as the nature of the Living Creature was eternal, this quality it was impossible to attach in its entirety to what is generated; wherefore He planned to make a movable image of Eternity, and, as He set in order the Heaven, of that Eternity which abides in unity He made an eternal image, moving according to number, even that which we have named Time.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="37e"/> For simultaneously with the construction of the Heaven He contrived the production of days and nights and months and years, which existed not before the Heaven came into being. And these are all portions of Time; even as <q type="emph">Was</q> and <q type="emph">Shall be</q> are generated forms of Time, although we apply them wrongly, without noticing, to Eternal Being.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="38"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> For we say that it <q type="emph">is</q> or <q type="emph">was</q> or <q type="emph">will be,</q> whereas, in truth of speech, <q type="emph">is</q> alone <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="38"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="38a"/> is the appropriate term; <q type="emph">was</q> and <q type="emph">will be,</q> on the other hand, are terms properly applicable to the Becoming which proceeds in Time, since both of these are motions; but it belongs not to that which is ever changeless in its uniformity to become either older or younger through time, nor ever to have become so, nor to be so now, nor to be about to be so hereafter, nor in general to be subject to any of the conditions which Becoming has attached to the things which move in the world of Sense, these being generated forms of Time, which imitates Eternity and circles round according to number. And besides these we make use of the following expressions,—  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="38b"/> that what is become is become, and what is becoming is becoming, and what is about to become is about to become, and what is non-existent is non-existent; but none of these expressions is accurate.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e.it is incorrect to use the term <q type="emph">is</q> (<foreign xml:lang="greek">ἐστί</foreign>) both as a mere copula and in the sense of <gloss>exists.</gloss></note> But the present is not, perhaps, a fitting occasion for an exact discussion of these matters.

   <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Time, then, came into existence along with the Heaven, to the end that having been generated together they might also be dissolved together, if ever a dissolution of them should take place; and it was made after the pattern of the Eternal Nature, to the end that it might be as like thereto as possible; for whereas the pattern is existent through all eternity,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="38c"/> the copy, on the other hand, is through all time, continually having existed, existing, and being about to exist. Wherefore, as a consequence of this reasoning and design on the part of God, with a view to the generation of Time, the sun and moon and five other stars, which bear the appellation of <q type="emph">planets,</q> came into existence for the determining and preserving of the numbers of Time. And when God had made the bodies of each of them He placed them in the orbits along which the revolution of the Other was moving, seven orbits for the seven bodies.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 36 D.</note>.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="38d"/> The Moon He placed in the first circle around the Earth, the Sun in the second above the Earth; and the <name type="place" key="tgn,2475927">Morning Star</name> <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e.a tendency as to direction.</note> and the Star called Sacred to Hermes He placed in those circles which move in an orbit equal to the Sun in velocity, but endowed with a power<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., a tendency as to direction.</note> contrary thereto; whence it is that the Sun and the Star of Hermes and the <name type="place" key="tgn,2475927">Morning Star</name> regularly overtake and are overtaken by one another. As to the rest of the stars, were one to describe in detail the positions in which He set them, and all the reasons therefor,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="38e"/> the description, though but subsidiary, would prove a heavier task than the main argument which it subserves. Later on, perhaps, at our leisure these points may receive the attention they merit.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="39"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p><milestone unit="para"/>So when each of the bodies whose co-operation was required for the making of Time had arrived in its proper orbit; and when they had been generated as living creatures, having their bodies bound with living bonds, <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="39"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="39a"/> and had learnt their appointed duties; then they kept revolving around the circuit of the Other, which is transverse and passes through the circuit of the Same and is dominated thereby; and part of them moved in a greater, part in a smaller circle, those in the smaller moving more quickly and those in the greater more slowly. And because of the motion of the Same, the stars which revolved most quickly appeared to be overtaken by those which moved most slowly, although in truth they overtook them;  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="39b"/> for, because of their simultaneous progress in two opposite directions,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., a planet moving along the Ecliptic from W. to E. is at the same time drawn from E. to W. (in the plane of the Equator) by the regular motion of the sphere of the fixed stars (the circle of <q type="emph">the same</q> which moves at a higher velocity than that of <q type="emph">the other</q>).</note> the motion of the Same, which is the swiftest of all motions, twisted all their circles into spirals and thus caused the body which moves away from it most slowly to appear the nearest.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e.<name type="place" key="tgn,2644982">Saturn</name> appears to be nearest to the sphere of the fixed stars in point of velocity. Cf. <title>Laws</title>822 A ff.</note> And in order that there might be a clear measure of the relative speeds, slow and quick, with which they travelled round their eight orbits, in that circle which is second from the earth God kindled a light which now we call the Sun, to the end that it might shine, so far as possible, throughout the whole Heaven, and that all the living creatures entitled thereto might participate in number, learning it from the revolution of the Same and Similar.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="39c"/> In this wise and for these reasons were generated Night and Day, which are the revolution of the one and most intelligent circuit; and Month, every time that the <name type="place" key="tgn,2522127">Moon</name> having completed her own orbit overtakes the Sun; and Year, as often as the Sun has completed his own orbit. Of the other stars the revolutions have not been discovered by men (save for a few out of the many); wherefore they have no names for them, nor do they compute and compare their relative measurements, so that they are not aware, as a rule,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="39d"/> that the <q type="emph">wanderings</q><note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">An allusion to the name <q type="emph">planets,</q> i.e. <q type="emph">wanderers</q>; Cf. 38 c.</note> of these bodies, which are hard to calculate and of wondrous complexity, constitute Time. Nevertheless, it is still quite possible to perceive that the complete number of Time fulfils the Complete Year<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., the Great World-Year, which is completed when all the planets return simultaneously to their original starting points. Its length was variously computed: Plato seems to have put it at 36,000 years (Cf. <title>Rep</title>. 546 B ff.).</note> when all the eight circuits, with their relative speeds, finish together and come to a head, when measured by the revolution of the Same and Similarly-moving. In this wise and for these reasons were generated all those stars which turn themselves about as they travel through Heaven, to the end that this Universe might be as similar as possible to the perfect and intelligible Living Creature in respect of its imitation of the Eternal  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="39e"/> Nature thereof.

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Now in all other respects this World had already, with the birth of Time, been wrought in the similitude of that whereunto it was being likened, but inasmuch as it did not as yet contain generated within it the whole range of living creatures, therein it was still dissimilar. So this part of the work which was still undone He completed by molding it after the nature of the Model. According, then, as Reason perceives Forms existing in the Absolute Living Creature, such and so many as exist therein did He deem that this World also should possess.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="40"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> And these Forms are four,—one the heavenly kind of gods<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., the stars.</note>; <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="40"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="40a"/> another the winged kind which traverses the air;
                     thirdly, the class which inhabits the waters; and fourthly, that which goes on
                     foot on dry land. The form of the divine class<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., the fixed stars, and their sphere which moves with
                        the daily rotation of the spherical Cosmos (the motion proper to <q type="emph">intelligence,</q> Cf. 36 C,<title>Cratyl</title>. 411
                        D).</note> He wrought for the most part out of fire, that this kind might be
                     as bright as possible to behold and as fair; and likening it to the All He made
                     it truly spherical; and He placed it in the intelligence<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., the <q type="emph">intelligent</q>
                        outermost sphere of <q type="emph">the same</q> (cf. the derivation of
                           <foreign xml:lang="greek">φρόνησις</foreign>from <foreign xml:lang="greek">φορά</foreign>in <title>Cratyl</title>. 411 D).</note>
                     of the Supreme to follow therewith, distributing it round about over all the
                     Heaven, to be unto it a veritable adornment<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">There is a play here on the word <foreign xml:lang="greek">κόσμος</foreign>, as meaning (1)
                           <gloss>adornment,</gloss> (2) <gloss>universe.</gloss></note> cunningly
                     traced over the whole. And each member of this class He endowed with two
                        motions,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e. (1) the
                        rotation of the star on its own axis; (2) the diurnal revolution of the
                        sphere of fixed stars.</note> whereof the one is uniform motion in the same
                     spot, whereby it conceives always identical thoughts about the same objects,
                        <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="40b"/> and the other is a
                     forward motion due to its being dominated by the revolution of the Same and
                     Similar; but in respect of the other five motions<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 34 A, 43 B.</note> they are at rest and
                     move not, so that each of them may attain the greatest possible perfection.
                     From this cause, then, came into existence all those unwandering stars which
                     are living creatures divine and eternal and abide for ever revolving uniformly
                     in the same spot; and those which keep swerving and wandering have been
                     generated in the fashion previously described. And Earth, our nurse, which is
                     globed around<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">The Word
                           <foreign xml:lang="greek">εἴλλεσθαι </foreign>(or <foreign xml:lang="greek">ἴλλεσθαι</foreign>) is taken by some to imply
                           <gloss>oscillation</gloss> or <gloss>rotation</gloss> (Cf.
                           Aristot.<title>De caelo</title>ii. 293 b 30); but it seems best to
                        suppose that Plato is here regarding the Earth as stationary. Her potential
                        motion (we may assume) is equal and opposite to that of the Universe, of
                        which she is the center, and by thus neutralizing it she remains at
                        rest.</note> the pole that stretches through all, <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="40c"/> He framed to be the wardress and fashioner of
                     night and day, she being the first and eldest of all the gods which have come
                     into existence within the Heaven. But the choric dances of these same stars and
                     their crossings one of another, and the relative reversals and progressions of
                     their orbits, and which of the gods meet in their conjunctions, and how many
                     are in opposition, and behind which and at what times they severally pass
                     before one another and are hidden from our view, and again re-appearing
                        <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="40d"/> send upon men unable to
                     calculate alarming portents of the things which shall come to pass
                     hereafter,—to describe all this without an inspection of models<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e.such instruments as a
                        celestial globe or planetarium.</note> of these movements would be labor in
                     vain. Wherefore, let this account suffice us, and let our discourse concerning
                     the nature of the visible and generated gods have an end. <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Concerning the other divinities, to discover and declare their
                     origin is too great a task for us, and we must trust to those who have declared
                     it aforetime, they being, as they affirmed, descendants of gods and knowing
                     well, no doubt, their own forefathers.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">This is, obviously, ironical; Cf. <title>Cratyl</title>.
                        402 B,<title>Phileb</title>. 66 C.</note>
                     <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="40e"/> It is, as I say,
                     impossible to disbelieve the children of gods, even though their statements
                     lack either probable or necessary demonstration; and inasmuch as they profess
                     to speak of family matters, we must follow custom and believe them.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="41"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> Therefore let the generation of these gods be stated by us, following their account, in this wise: Of Ge and Uranus were born the children Oceanus and Tethys; and of these, Phorkys, Cronos, Rhea, and all that go with them; <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="41"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="41a"/> and of Cronos and Rhea were born Zeus and Hera and all those who are, as we know, called their brethren; and of these again, other descendants.

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Now when all the gods, both those who revolve manifestly<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e.the Stars; the others are the deities of popular belief (such as Homer depicts).</note> and those who manifest themselves so far as they choose, had come to birth, He that generated this All addressed them thus:

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Gods of gods,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">An intensive form of expression, like the Biblical <q type="written">King of kings and Lord of lords.</q></note> those works whereof I am framer and father are indissoluble save by my will. For though all that is bound may be dissolved,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="41b"/> yet to will to dissolve that which is fairly joined together and in good case were the deed of a wicked one. Wherefore ye also, seeing that ye were generated, are not wholly immortal or indissoluble, yet in no wise shall ye be dissolved nor incur the doom of death, seeing that in my will ye possess a bond greater and more sovereign than the bonds wherewith, at your birth, ye were bound together. Now, therefore, what I manifest and declare unto you do ye learn. Three mortal kinds<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Viz. the inhabitants of air, of water, and of earth.</note> still remain ungenerated; but if these come not into being the Heaven will be imperfect; for it will not contain within itself the whole sum of the hinds of living creatures, yet contain them it must if  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="41c"/> it is to be fully perfect. But if by my doing these creatures came into existence and partook of life, they would be made equal unto gods; in order, therefore, that they may be mortal and that this World-all may be truly All, do ye turn yourselves, as Nature directs, to the work of fashioning these living creatures, imitating the power showed by me in my generating of you. Now so much of them as it is proper to designate ’immortal,’ the part we call divine which rules supreme in those who are fain to follow justice always and yourselves, that part I will deliver unto you when I have sown it and given it origin.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="41d"/> For the rest, do ye weave together the mortal with the immortal, and thereby fashion and generate living creatures, and give them food that they may grow, and when they waste away receive them to yourselves again.</q>

   <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Thus He spake, and once more into the former bowl, wherein He had blended and mixed the Soul of the Universe, He poured the residue of the previous material, mixing it in somewhat the same manner, yet no longer with a uniform and invariable purity, but second and third in degree of purity. And when He had compounded the whole He divided it into souls equal in number to the stars, and each several soul He assigned to one star,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="41e"/> and setting them each as it were in a chariot<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. <title>Laws</title>899 A.</note> He showed them the nature of the Universe, and declared unto them the laws of destiny,—namely, how that the first birth should be one and the same ordained for all, in order that none might be slighted by Him; and how it was needful that they, when sown each into his own proper organ of time,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified"> i.e. star.</note> should grow into the most god-fearing of living creatures; <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="42"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="42a"/> and that, since human nature is two-fold, the superior sex is that which hereafter should be designated <q type="emph">man.</q></p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="42"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> And when, by virtue of Necessity, they should be implanted in bodies, and their bodies are subject to influx and efflux, these results would necessarily follow,—firstly, sensation that is innate and common to all proceeding from violent affections; secondly, desire mingled with pleasure and pain; and besides these, fear and anger  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="42b"/> and all such emotions as are naturally allied thereto, and all such as are of a different and opposite character. And if they shall master these they will live justly, but if they are mastered, unjustly. And he that has lived his appointed time well shall return again to his abode in his native star, and shall gain a life that is blessed and congenial but whoso has failed therein shall be changed into woman’s nature at the second birth;<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 90 E.</note> and if, in that shape, he still refraineth not from wickedness  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="42c"/> he shall be changed every time, according to the nature of his wickedness, into some bestial form after the similitude of his own nature; nor in his changings shall he cease from woes until he yields himself to the revolution of the Same and Similar that is within him, and dominating by force of reason that burdensome mass which afterwards adhered to him of fire and water  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="42d"/> and earth and air, a mass tumultuous and irrational, returns again to the semblance of his first and best state.

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>When He had fully declared unto them all these ordinances, to the end that He might be blameless in respect of the future wickedness of any one of them, He proceeded to sow them, some in the Earth, some in the <name type="place" key="tgn,1127331">Moon</name>, others in the rest of the organs of Time. Following upon this sowing, He delivered over to the young gods the task of molding mortal bodies, and of framing and controlling all the rest of the human soul which it was still necessary to add, together with all that belonged thereto,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="42e"/> and of governing this mortal creature in the fairest and best way possible, to the utmost of their power, except in so far as it might itself become the cause of its own evils.

 <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>So He, then, having given all these commands, was abiding in His own proper and wonted state.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="43"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> And as He thus abode, His children gave heed to their Father’s command and obeyed it. They took the immortal principle of the mortal living creature, and imitating their own Maker, they borrowed from the Cosmos portions of fire and earth and water and air, <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="43"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="43a"/> as if meaning to pay them back, and the portions so taken they cemented together; but it was not with those indissoluble bonds wherewith they themselves were joined that they fastened together the portions but with numerous pegs, invisible for smallness; and thus they constructed out of them all each several body, and within bodies subject to inflow and outflow they bound the revolutions of the immortal Soul. The souls, then, being thus bound within a mighty river neither mastered it nor were mastered, but with violence they rolled along and were rolled along themselves,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="43b"/> so that the whole of the living creature was moved, but in such a random way that its progress was disorderly and irrational, since it partook of all the six motions<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e. omitting the seventh motion (<q type="emph">rotation</q>), Cf. 34 A.</note>: for it progressed forwards and backwards, and again to right and to left, and upwards and downwards, wandering every way in all the six directions. For while the flood which foamed in and streamed out, as it supplied the food, was immense, still greater was the tumult produced  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="43c"/> within each creature as a result of the colliding bodies, when the body of a creature happened to meet and collide with alien fire from without, or with a solid lump of earth or liquid glidings of waters, or when it was overtaken by a tempest of winds driven by air, and when the motions due to all these causes rushing through the body impinged upon the Soul. And for these reasons all such motions were then termed <q type="emph">Sensations,</q><note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., <foreign xml:lang="greek">αἴσθησις</foreign> (<gloss>sensation</gloss>) is here derived from <foreign xml:lang="greek">ἀίσσω</foreign> (<gloss>dart,</gloss> <gloss>rush</gloss>).</note> and are still so termed today. Moreover, since at that time they were causing, for the moment, constant and widespread motion, joining with the perpetually flowing stream  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="43d"/> in moving and violently shaking the revolutions of the Soul, they totally blocked the course of the Same by flowing contrary thereto, and hindered it thereby in its ruling and its going; while, on the other hand, they so shook up the course of the Other that in the three several intervals of the double and the triple,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 35 B.</note> and in the mean terms and binding links of the 3/2, 4/3 and 9/8,—these being not wholly dissoluble save by Him who had bound them together,—they produced all manner of twistings, and caused  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="43e"/> in their circles fractures and disruptions of every possible kind, with the result that, as they barely held together one with another, they moved indeed but moved irrationally, being at one time reversed, at another oblique, and again upside down. Suppose, for example, that a man is in an upside down position, with his head resting on the earth and his feet touching something above, then, in this position of the man relative to that of the onlookers, his right will appear left to them, and his left right, and so will theirs to him.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="44"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> This, and such like, are just what the revolutions of the Soul experience with intensity; <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="44"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="44a"/> and every time they happen upon any external object, whether it be of the class of the Same or of the Other,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 37 A.</note> they proclaim it to be the same as something or other than something contrary to the truth, and thereby prove themselves false and foolish, and devoid, at such times, of any revolution that rules and guides. And whenever external sensations in their movement collide with these revolutions and sweep along with them also the whole vessel of the Soul, then the revolutions, though actually mastered, appear to have the mastery. Hence it comes about that, because of all these affections, now as in the beginning,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="44b"/> so often as the Soul is bound within a mortal body it becomes at the first irrational.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 86 E;<title>Phaedo</title>81 C, 83 D.</note> But as soon as the stream of increase and nutriment enters in less volume, and the revolutions calm down and pursue their own path, becoming more stable as time proceeds, then at length, as the several circles move each according to its natural track, their revolutions are straightened out and they announce the Same and the Other aright, and thereby they render their possessor intelligent. And if so be  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="44c"/> that this state of his soul be reinforced by right educational training, the man becomes wholly sound and faultless, having escaped the worst of maladies;<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e.ignorance; Cf. 86 B ff.,<title>Laws</title>863 C ff.</note> but if he has been wholly negligent therein, after passing a lame existence in life he returns again unperfected and unreasoning to Hades. These results, however, come about at a later time.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 86 B ff.</note> Regarding the subjects now before us, we must give a more exact exposition; and also regarding the subjects anterior to these, namely, the generation of bodies in their several parts, and the causes and divine counsels whereby the Soul has come into existence, we must hold fast to the most probable<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 29 C, D.</note> account,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="44d"/> and proceed accordingly, in the exposition now to be given.

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>The divine revolutions, which are two, they bound within a sphere-shaped body, in imitation of the spherical form<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 73 C, 81 D.</note> of the All, which body we now call the <q type="emph">head,</q> it being the most divine part and reigning over all the parts within us. To it the gods delivered over the whole of the body they had assembled to be its servant, having formed the notion that it should partake in all the motions which were to be.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="44e"/> In order, then, that it should not go rolling upon the earth, which has all manner of heights and hollows, and be at a loss how to climb over the one and climb out of the other, they bestowed upon it the body as a vehicle and means of transport.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="45"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> And for this reason the body acquired length, and, by God’s contriving, shot forth four limbs, extensible and flexible, <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="45"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="45a"/> to serve as instruments of transport, so that grasping with these and’ supported thereon it was enabled to travel through all places, bearing aloft the chamber of our most divine and holy part. In this wise and for these reasons were legs and hands attached to all men; and inasmuch as they demand the forepart superior to the hinder part in honor and dignity, the Gods gave us the most part of our going in this direction. Thus it was necessary that man should have the forepart of his body distinct and dissimilar. Wherefore, dealing first with the vessel of the head, they set the face in the front thereof  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="45b"/> and bound within it organs for all the forethought of the Soul; and they ordained that this, which is the natural front, should be the leading part. And of the organs they constructed first light-bearing eyes, and these they fixed in the face for the reason following. They contrived that all such fire as had the property not of burning but of giving a mild light should form a body akin to the light of every day.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">There is a play here on the words <foreign xml:lang="greek">ἥμερον</foreign> (<gloss>mild</gloss>)... <foreign xml:lang="greek">ἡμέρας</foreign> (<gloss>day</gloss>); Cf. <title>Cratyl</title>. 418 C.</note> For they caused the pure fire within us, which is akin to that of day, to flow through the eyes in a smooth and dense stream;  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="45c"/> and they compressed the whole substance, and especially the center, of the eyes, so that they occluded all other fire that was coarser and allowed only this pure kind of fire to filter through. So whenever the stream of vision is surrounded by midday light, it flows out like unto like,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Vision is explained on the principle that <q type="emph">like is known by like</q>: a fire-stream issuing from the eye meets a fire-stream coming from the object of vision ( Cf. the view of Empedocles).</note> and coalescing therewith it forms one kindred substance along the path of the eyes’ vision, wheresoever the fire which streams from within collides with an obstructing object without. And this substance, having all become similar in its properties because of its similar nature,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="45d"/> distributes the motions of every object it touches, or whereby it is touched, throughout all the body even unto the Soul, and brings about that sensation which we now term <q type="emph">seeing.</q> But when the kindred fire vanishes into night, the inner fire is cut off; for when it issues forth into what is dissimilar it becomes altered in itself and is quenched, seeing that it is no longer of like nature with the adjoining air, since that air is devoid of fire. Wherefore it leaves off seeing, and becomes also an inducement to sleep. For the eyelids —whose structure the Gods devised  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="45e"/> as a safeguard for the vision,—when they are shut close, curb the power of the inner fire; which power dissipates and allays the inward motions, and upon their allaying quiet ensues; and when this quiet has become intense there falls upon us a sleep that is well-nigh dreamless;</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="46"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p>but when some greater motions are still left behind, according to their nature and the positions they occupy <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="46"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="46a"/> such and so great are the images they produce, which images are copied within and are remembered by the sleepers when they awake out of the dream. And it is no longer difficult to perceive the truth about the formation of images in mirrors and in bright and smooth surfaces of every kind. It is from the combination with each other of the inner and the outer fires, every time that they unite on the smooth surface and are variously deflected,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="46b"/> that all such reflections necessarily result, owing to the fire of the reflected face coalescing with the fire of the vision on the smooth and bright surface.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">e.g.when a man looks at his own face reflected in a mirror. Cf. <title>Soph</title>.266 C.</note> And left appears as right, because contact takes place between opposite portions of the visual stream and opposite portions of the object, contrary to the regular mode of collision. Contrariwise, right appears as right and left as left whenever the fire changes sides on coalescing with the object  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="46c"/> wherewith it coalesces; and this occurs whenever the smooth surface of the mirrors, being elevated on this side and on that,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., concave (and hemi-cylindrical).</note> repels the right portion of the visual stream to the left and the left to the right. And when this same mirror is turned lengthwise to the face it makes the whole face appear upside down, since it repels the bottom of the ray to the top, and conversely the top to the bottom.

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Now all these are among the auxiliary Causes<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">These causes are <q type="emph">secondary,</q> as contrasted with the <q type="emph">primary</q> or First Cause (which is also the <q type="emph">final Cause</q>), <q type="emph">the Good</q>; Cf. 29 E, 68 E,<title>Phaedo</title>99 B.</note> which God employs as his ministers in perfecting, so far as possible,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="46d"/> the Form of the Most Good; but by the most of men<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">e.g. Anaxagoras and the Atomists.</note> they are supposed to be not auxiliary but primary causes of all things—cooling and heating, solidifying and dissolving, and producing all such effects. Yet they are incapable of possessing reason and thought for any purpose. For, as we must affirm, the one and only existing thing which has the property of acquiring thought is Soul; and Soul is invisible, whereas fire and water and earth and air are all visible bodies; and the lover of thought and knowledge must needs pursue first  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="46e"/> the causes which belong to the Intelligent Nature, and put second all such as are of the class of things which are moved by others, and themselves, in turn, move others because they cannot help it. And we also must act likewise. We must declare both kinds of Causes, but keep distinct those which, with the aid of thought, are artificers of things fair and good, and all those which are devoid of intelligence and produce always accidental and irregular effects.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="47"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Now regarding the auxiliary causes which have helped the eyes to acquire the power which they now possess, let this statement suffice. Next we must declare the most important <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="47"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="47a"/> benefit effected by them, for the sake of which God bestowed them upon us. Vision, in my view, is the cause of the greatest benefit to us, inasmuch as none of the accounts now given concerning the Universe would ever have been given if men had not seen the stars or the sun or the heaven. But as it is, the vision of day and night and of months and circling years has created the art of number and has given us not only the notion of Time<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 37 D ff.</note> but also means of research into the nature of the Universe. From these we have procured Philosophy in all its range,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="47b"/> than which no greater boon ever has come or will come, by divine bestowal, unto the race of mortals.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. <title>Phileb</title>. 16 C ff.</note> This I affirm to be the greatest good of eyesight. As for all the lesser goods, why should we celebrate them? He that is no philosopher when deprived of the sight thereof may utter vain lamentations!<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">An echo of Eurip.<title>Phoenissae</title>1762 <foreign xml:lang="greek">ἀλλὰ γὰρ τί ταῦτα θρηνῶ καὶ μάτην ὀδύρομαι</foreign>;</note> But the cause and purpose of that best good, as we must maintain, is this,—that God devised and bestowed upon us vision to the end that we might behold the revolutions of Reason in the Heaven and use them for the revolvings of the reasoning that is within us, these being akin to those,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="47c"/> the perturbable to the imperturbable; and that, through learning and sharing in calculations which are correct by their nature, by imitation of the absolutely unvarying revolutions of the God we might stabilize the variable revolutions within ourselves.

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Concerning sound also and hearing, once more we make the same declaration, that they were bestowed by the Gods with the same object and for the same reasons; for it was for these same purposes that speech was ordained, and it makes the greatest contribution thereto; music too, in so far as it uses audible sound,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="47d"/> was bestowed for the sake of harmony.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">For the importance of music in education Cf. <title>Rep</title>.401 D,<title>Laws</title>666 D ff.; also <title>Tim</title>.80 B.</note> And harmony, which has motions akin to the revolutions of the Soul within us, was given by the Muses to him who makes intelligent use of the Muses, not as an aid to irrational pleasure, as is now supposed, but as an auxiliary to the inner revolution of the Soul, when it has lost its harmony, to assist in restoring it to order and concord with itself. And because of the unmodulated condition,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="47e"/> deficient in grace, which exists in most of us, Rhythm also was bestowed upon us to be our helper by the same deities and for the same ends.

                  <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>The foregoing part of our discourse, save for a small portion, has been an exposition of the operations of Reason; but we must also furnish an account of what comes into existence through Necessity.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., the sphere of mechanical causation, physical and physiological processes and results.</note></p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="48"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="48"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="48a"/> For, in truth, this Cosmos in its origin was generated as a compound, from the combination of Necessity and Reason. And inasmuch as Reason was controlling Necessity by persuading her to conduct to the best end the most part of the things coming into existence, thus and thereby it came about, through Necessity yielding to intelligent persuasion, that this Universe of ours was being in this wise constructed at the beginning. Wherefore if one is to declare how it actually came into being on this wise, he must include also the form of the Errant Cause, in the way that it really acts. To this point, therefore, we must return,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="48b"/> and taking once again a fresh starting point suitable to the matter we must make a fresh start in dealing therewith, just as we did with our previous subjects. We must gain a view of the real nature of fire and water, air and earth, as it was before the birth of Heaven, and the properties they had before that time; for at present no one has as yet declared their generation, but we assume that men know what fire is, and each of these things, and we call them principles and presume that they are elements<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified"><foreign xml:lang="greek">στοιχεῖα</foreign>, here applied to physical <q type="emph">elements,</q> was the regular term for <q type="emph">letters</q> of the alphabet; Cf. <title>Theaet</title>. 203 B ff.,<title>Rep</title>.402 A ff.</note> of the Universe, although in truth they do not so much as deserve to be likened with any likelihood,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="48c"/> by the man who has even a grain of sense, to the class of syllables. For the present, however, let our procedure be as follows. We shall not now expound the principle of all things—or their principles, or whatever term we use concerning them; and that solely for this reason, that it is difficult for us to explain our views while keeping to our present method of exposition.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., a method which aims only at <q type="emph">probability</q> or <q type="emph">likelihood</q>: to attain to <q type="emph">first principles</q> we should need to employ the <q type="emph">dialectic</q> method.</note> You, therefore, ought not to suppose that I should expound them, while as for me—I should never be able to convince myself that I should be right in attempting to undertake so great a task. Strictly adhering, then,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="48d"/> to what we previously affirmed, the import of the <q type="emph">likely</q> account, I will essay (as I did before) to give as <q type="emph">likely</q> an exposition as any other (nay, more so), regarding both particular things and the totality of things from the very beginning. And as before,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 27 C.</note> so now, at the commencement of our account, we must call upon God the Saviour to bring us safe through a novel and unwonted exposition  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="48e"/> to a conclusion based on likelihood, and thus begin our account once more.

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>We must, however, in beginning our fresh account of the Universe make more distinctions than we did before; for whereas then we distinguished two Forms,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 28 A.</note> we must now declare another third kind.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="49"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> For our former exposition those two were sufficient, one of them being assumed as a Model Form, intelligible and ever uniformly existent, <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="49"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="49a"/> and the second as the model’s Copy, subject to becoming and visible. A third kind we did not at that time distinguish, considering that those two were sufficient; but now the argument seems to compel us to try to reveal by words a Form that is baffling and obscure. What essential property, then, are we to conceive it to possess? This in particular,—that it should be the receptacle, and as it were the nurse, of all Becoming. Yet true though this statement is, we must needs describe it more plainly.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="49b"/> That, however, is a difficult task, especially because it is necessary, for its sake, to discuss first the problem of fire and its fellow elements. For in regard to these it is hard to say which particular element we ought really to term water rather than fire, and which we ought to term any one element rather than each and all of them, while still employing a terminology that is reliable and stable. How, then, shall we handle this problem, and what likely solution can we offer? First of all, we see that which we now call <q type="emph">water</q> becoming by condensation,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="49c"/> as we believe, stones and earth; and again, this same substance, by dissolving and dilating, becoming breath and air; and air through combustion becoming fire; and conversely, fire when contracted and quenched returning back to the form of air and air once more uniting and condensing into cloud and mist; and issuing from these, when still further compressed, flowing water; and from water earth and stones again: thus we see the elements passing on to one another, as it would seem,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="49d"/> in an unbroken circle the gift of birth. Accordingly, since no one of these ever remains identical in appearance, which of them shall a man definitely affirm to be any one particular element and no other without incurring ridicule? None such exists. On the contrary, by far the safest plan in treating of these elements is to proceed thus: Whatsoever object we perceive to be constantly changing from one state to another, like fire, that object, be it fire, we must never describe as <q type="emph">this</q> but as <q type="emph">suchlike,</q> nor should we ever call water <q type="emph">this</q> but <q type="emph">suchlike</q> nor should we describe any other element, as though it possessed stability,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="49e"/> of all those which we indicate by using the terms <q type="emph">this</q> and <q type="emph">that</q> and suppose ourselves to refer to a definite object. For such an object shuns and eludes the names <q type="emph">this</q> and <q type="emph">that</q> and every name which indicates that they are stable. Thus we must not call the several elements <q type="emph">these,</q> but in regard to each of them and all together we must apply the term <q type="emph">suchlike</q> to represent what is always circling round: thus we shall call that which is constantly <q type="emph">suchlike</q> by the name of fire, and so with everything else that is generated.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="50"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> But that <q type="emph">wherein</q> they are always, in appearance, <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="50"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="50a"/> coming severally into existence, and <q type="emph">wherefrom</q> in turn they perish, in describing that and that alone should we employ the terms <q type="emph">this</q> and <q type="emph">that</q>; whereas, in describing what is <q type="emph">suchlike</q>—hot, for instance, or white, or any of the opposite qualities, or any compounds thereof—we ought never to apply to it any of these terms.

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>But we must bestir ourselves to explain this matter again yet more clearly. Now imagine that a man were to model all possible figures out of gold, and were then to proceed without cessation to remodel each of these into every other, then, if someone were to point to one of the figures and ask what it is,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="50b"/> by far the safest reply, in point of truth, would be that it is gold; but as for the triangle and all the other figures which were formed in it, one should never describe them as <q type="emph">being</q> seeing that they change even while one is mentioning them; rather one should be content if the figure admits of even the title <q type="emph">suchlike</q> being applied to it with any safety. And of the substance which receives all bodies  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="50c"/> the same account must be given. It must be called always by the same name; for from its own proper quality it never departs at all for while it is always receiving all things, nowhere and in no wise does it assume any shape similar to any of the things that enter into it. For it is laid down by nature as a molding-stuff for everything, being moved and marked by the entering figures, and because of them it appears different at different times. And the figures that enter and depart are copies of those that are always existent, being stamped from them in a fashion marvellous and hard to describe, which we shall investigate hereafter.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 53 C.</note> 

                  <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>For the present, then, we must conceive of three kinds,—the Becoming, that <q type="emph">Wherein</q> it becomes, and the source <q type="emph">Wherefrom</q> the Becoming  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="50d"/> is copied and produced. Moreover, it is proper to liken the Recipient to the Mother, the Source to the Father, and what is engendered between these two to the Offspring; and also to perceive that, if the stamped copy is to assume diverse appearances of all sorts, that substance wherein it is set and stamped could not possibly be suited to its purpose unless it were itself devoid of all those forms which it is about to receive from any quarter.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="50e"/> For were it similar to any of the entering forms, on receiving forms of an opposite or wholly different kind, as they arrived, it would copy them badly, through obtruding its own visible shape. Wherefore it is right that the substance which is to receive within itself all the kinds should be void of all forms; just as with all fragrant ointments, men bring about this condition by artistic contrivance and make the liquids which are to receive the odors as odorless as possible; and all who essay to mold figures in any soft material utterly refuse to allow any previous figure to remain visible therein, and begin by making it even and as smooth as possible before they execute the work.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="51"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="51"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="51a"/><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p>So likewise it is right that the substance which is to be fitted to receive frequently over its whole extent the copies of all things intelligible and eternal should itself, of its own nature, be void of all the forms. Wherefore, let us not speak of her that is the Mother and Receptacle of this generated world, which is perceptible by sight and all the senses, by the name of earth or air or fire or water, or any aggregates or constituents thereof: rather, if we describe her as a Kind invisible and unshaped, all-receptive, and in some most perplexing and most baffling way partaking of the intelligible,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="51b"/> we shall describe her truly.

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>In so far as it is possible to arrive at the nature of this kind from the foregoing account, one may state it most correctly in this way. That part of it which is made fiery appears each time as fire, that which has been liquefied as water; and it appears as earth and air in so far as it receives copies of these. But let us investigate the matter by more exact reasoning, and consider this question. Does there exist any self-subsisting fire  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="51c"/> or any of those other objects which we likewise term <q type="emph">self-subsisting realities</q>? Or is it only these things which we see, or otherwise perceive by means of bodily senses, that exist, possessed of sensible reality; beside which no other things exist anywhere or anyhow, and it is merely an idle assertion of ours that there always exists an intelligible Form of every object, whereas it is really nothing more than a verbal phrase? Now, on the one hand, it would be improper to dismiss the question before us without a trial and a verdict, and simply to asseverate that the fact is so; while, on the other hand, we ought not to burden a lengthy discourse with another subsidiary argument.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="51d"/> If, however, it were possible to disclose briefly some main determining principle, that would best serve our purpose.

                  <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>This, then, is the view for which I, for my part, cast my vote. If Reason and True Opinion are two distinct Kinds, most certainly these self-subsisting Forms do exist, imperceptible by our senses, and objects of Reason only; whereas if, as appears to some, True Opinion differs in naught from Reason, then, on the contrary, all the things which we perceive by our bodily senses must be judged to be most stable.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="51e"/> Now these two Kinds must be declared to be two, because they have come into existence separately and are unlike in condition. For the one of them arises in us by teaching, the other by persuasion; and the one is always in company with true reasoning, whereas the other is irrational; and the one is immovable by persuasion, whereas the other is alterable by persuasion; and of the one we must assert that every man partakes, but of Reason only the gods and but a small class of men.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="52"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> This being so, we must agree that One Kind <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="52"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="52a"/> is the self-identical Form, ungenerated and indestructible, neither receiving into itself any other from any quarter nor itself passing anywhither into another, invisible and in all ways imperceptible by sense, it being the object which it is the province of Reason to contemplate; and a second Kind is that which is named after the former and similar thereto, an object perceptible by sense, generated, ever carried about, becoming in a place and out of it again perishing, apprehensible by Opinion with the aid of Sensation; and a third Kind is ever-existing Place,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="52b"/> which admits not of destruction, and provides room for all things that have birth, itself being apprehensible by a kind of bastard reasoning by the aid of non-sensation, barely an object of belief; for when we regard this we dimly dream and affirm that it is somehow necessary that all that exists should exist <emph>in</emph> some spot and occupying some <emph>place</emph>, and that that which is neither on earth nor anywhere in the Heaven is nothing. So because of all these and other kindred notions, we are unable also on waking up to distinguish clearly the unsleeping and truly subsisting substance, owing to our dreamy condition,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="52c"/> or to state the truth—how that it belongs to a copy—seeing that it has not for its own even that substance for which it came into being, but fleets ever as a phantom of something else—to come into existence <emph>in</emph> some other thing, clinging to existence as best it may, on pain of being nothing at all; whereas to the aid of the really existent there comes the accurately true argument, that so long as one thing is one thing, and another something different, neither of the two will ever come to exist in the other so that the same thing becomes simultaneously  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="52d"/> both one and two.

                  <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Let this, then, be, according to my verdict, a reasoned account of the matter summarily stated,—that Being and Place and Becoming were existing, three distinct things, even before the Heaven came into existence; and that the Nurse of Becoming, being liquefied and ignified and receiving also the forms of earth and of air, and submitting to all the other affections which accompany these,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="52e"/> exhibits every variety of appearance; but owing to being filled with potencies that are neither similar nor balanced, in no part of herself is she equally balanced, but sways unevenly in every part, and is herself shaken by these forms and shakes them in turn as she is moved.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="53"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> And the forms, as they are moved, fly continually in various directions and are dissipated; just as the particles that are shaken and winnowed by the sieves and other instruments used for the cleansing of corn fall in one place if they are solid and heavy, <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="53"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="53a"/> but fly off and settle elsewhere if they are spongy and light. So it was also with the Four Kinds when shaken by the Recipient: her motion, like an instrument which causes shaking, was separating farthest from one another the dissimilar, and pushing most closely together the similar; wherefore also these Kinds occupied different places even before that the Universe was organized and generated out of them.

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Before that time, in truth, all these things were in a state devoid of reason or measure, but when the work of setting in order this Universe was being undertaken,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="53b"/> fire and water and earth and air, although possessing some traces of their own nature, were yet so disposed as everything is likely to be in the absence of God; and inasmuch as this was then their natural condition, God began by first marking them out into shapes by means of forms and numbers. And that God constructed them, so far as He could, to be as fair and good as possible, whereas they had been otherwise,—this above all else must always be postulated in our account. Now, however, it is the disposition and origin  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="53c"/> of each of these Kinds which I must endeavor to explain to you in an exposition of an unusual type; yet, inasmuch as you have some acquaintance with the technical method which I must necessarily employ in my exposition, you will follow me.

                  <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>In the first place, then, it is plain I presume to everyone that fire and earth and water and air are solid bodies; and the form of a body, in every case, possesses depth also. Further, it is absolutely necessary that depth should be bounded by a plane surface; and the rectilinear plane is composed of triangles.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="53d"/> Now all triangles derive their origin from two triangles, each having one angle right and the others acute<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., the rectangular isosceles triangle and the rectangular scalene; all other triangles can be built up from these two (e.g. see 54 E N.).</note>; and the one of these triangles has on each side half a right angle marked off by equal sides, while the other has the right angle divided into unequal parts by unequal sides. These we lay down as the principles of fire and all the other bodies, proceeding according to a method in which the probable is combined with the necessary; but the principles which are still higher than these are known only to God and the man who is dear to God.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="53e"/> We must now declare what will be the four fairest bodies, dissimilar to one another, but capable in part of being produced out of one another by means of dissolution; for if we succeed herein we shall grasp the truth concerning the generation of earth and fire and the mean proportionals. For to no one will we concede that fairer bodies than these, each distinct of its kind, are anywhere to be seen. Wherefore we must earnestly endeavor to frame together these four kinds of bodies which excel in beauty, and to maintain that we have apprehended <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="54"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="54a"/> their nature adequately.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="54"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> Now of the two triangles, the isosceles possesses one single nature, but the scalene an infinite number; and of these infinite natures we must select the fairest, if we mean to make a suitable beginning. If, then, anyone can claim that he has chosen one that is fairer for the construction of these bodies, he, as friend rather than foe, is the victor. We, however, shall pass over all the rest and postulate as the fairest of the triangles that triangle out of which, when two are conjoined,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="54b"/> the equilateral triangle is constructed as a third.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., the half of an equilateral triangle; e.g. if the triangle ABC is bisected by the line AD, we have two such triangles in ADB and ADC.</note> The reason why is a longer story; but should anyone refute us and discover that it is not so, we begrudge him not the prize. Accordingly, let these two triangles be selected as those wherefrom are contrived the bodies of fire and of the other elements,— one being the isosceles, and the other that which always has the square on its greater side three times the square on the lesser side.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., in the triangle ADB (see last note) AB = 2Bsquared, and (AB)squared = (BD)squared + (AD)squared; therefore 4(BD)squared = (BD)squared + (AD)squared, and so 3(BD)squared = (AD)squared.</note> 

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Moreover, a point about which our previous statement was obscure must now be defined more clearly. It appeared as if the four Kinds,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="54c"/> in being generated, all passed through one another into one another, but this appearance was deceptive. For out of the triangles which we have selected four Kinds are generated, three of them out of that one triangle which has its sides unequal, and the fourth Kind alone composed of the isosceles triangle. Consequently, they are not all capable of being dissolved into one another so as to form a few large bodies composed of many small ones, or the converse; but three of them do admit of this process. For these three are all naturally compounded of one triangle, so that when the larger bodies are dissolved many small ones will form themselves from these same bodies, receiving the shapes that befit them;  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="54d"/> and conversely, when many small bodies are resolved into their triangles they will produce, when unified, one single large mass of another Kind. So let thus much be declared concerning their generation into one another.

                  <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>In the next place we have to explain the form in which each Kind has come to exist and the numbers from which it is compounded. First will come that form which is primary and has the smallest components, and the element thereof is that triangle which has its hypotenuse twice as long as its lesser side. And when a pair of such triangles are joined along the line of the hypotenuse, and this is done thrice, by drawing the hypotenuses  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="54e"/> and the short sides together as to a center, there is produced from those triangles, six in number, one equilateral triangle.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">As in the figure the equilateral triangle ABC is divided into 6 triangles of unequal sides by joining the vertical points A, B, C to the points of bisection of the opposite sides, viz. D, E, F. Then the hypotenuse in each such triangle is double the shortest side (e.g. AO = 2FO). And FAO = 1/3 right angle; while FOA = 2/3 right angle. The <q type="emph">three plane edges</q> are thus of 60 degrees each = 180 degrees = <q type="emph">the most obtuse</q> plane angle; so that the solid angle is one degree less, i.e., 179 degrees.</note></p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="55"><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p> And when four equilateral triangles are combined so that three plane angles <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="55"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="55a"/> meet in a point, they form one solid angle, which comes next in order to the most obtuse of the plane angles. And when four such angles are produced, the first solid figure<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., the tetrahedron or pyramid (molecule of fire).</note> is constructed, which divides the whole of the circumscribed sphere into equal and similar parts. And the second solid<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., the octahedron (molecule of air).</note> is formed from the same triangles, but constructed out of eight equilateral triangles, which produce one solid angle out of four planes; and when six such solid angles have been formed, the second body in turn is completed.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="55b"/> And the third solid<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., the icosahedron (molecule of water).</note> is composed of twice sixty of the elemental triangles conjoined, and of twelve solid angles, each contained by five plane equilateral triangles, and it has, by its production, twenty equilateral triangular bases.

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Now the first of the elemental triangles ceased acting when it had generated these three solids, the substance of the fourth Kind<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., the cube, composed of 6x4 rectangular isosceles triangles (molecule of earth).</note> being generated by the isosceles triangle. Four of these combined, with their right angles drawn together to the center, produced one equilateral quadrangle; and six such quadrangles,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="55c"/> when joined together, formed eight solid angles, each composed of three plane right angles; and the shape of the body thus constructed was cubic, having six plane equilateral quadrangular bases. And seeing that there still remained one other compound figure, the fifth,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e., the dodecahedron. How God <q type="emph">used it up</q> is obscure: the reference may be to the 12 signs of the Zodiac.</note> God used it up for the Universe in his decoration thereof.

                  <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Now in reasoning about all these things, a man might question whether he ought to affirm the existence of an infinite diversity of Universes or a limited number; and if he questioned aright he would conclude that the doctrine of an infinite diversity is that of a man unversed<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">There is a play here on the two senses of <foreign xml:lang="greek">ἄπειρος</foreign>, <gloss>unlimited</gloss> and <gloss>unskilled</gloss>; Cf. <title>Phileb</title>. 17 E. The doctrine of an infinite number of worlds was held by the Atomists.</note>  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="55d"/> in matters wherein he ought to be versed; but the question whether they ought really to be described as one Universe or five is one which might with more reason give us pause. Now our view declares the Universe to be essentially one, in accordance with the probable account; but another man, considering other facts, will hold a different opinion. Him, however, we must let pass. But as for the Kinds which have now been generated by our argument, let us assign them severally to fire and earth and water and air. To earth let us give the cubic form; for of the four Kinds earth is the most immobile  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="55e"/> and the most plastic body, and of necessity the body which has the most stable bases must be pre-eminently of this character. Now of the triangles we originally assumed, the basis formed by equal sides is of its nature more stable than that formed by unequal sides; and of the plane surfaces which are compounded of these several triangles, the equilateral quadrangle, both in its parts and as a whole, has a more stable base than the equilateral triangle.</p></said></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="56"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="56"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="56a"/><said who="#Timaeus" rend="merge"><label>Tim.</label><p>  Wherefore, we are preserving the probable account when we assign this figure to earth, and of the remaining figures the least mobile to water, and the most mobile to fire, and the intermediate figure to air; and, further, when we assign the smallest body to fire, and the greatest to water, and the intermediate to air; and again, the first in point of sharpness to fire, the second to air, and the third to water. As regards all these forms, that which has the fewest bases must necessarily be the most mobile,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="56b"/> since it is in all ways the sharpest and most acute of all; and it must also be the lightest, since it is composed of the fewest identical parts; and the second comes second in point of these same qualities, and the third third.

<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Thus, in accordance with the right account and the probable, that solid which has taken the form of a pyramid shall be the element and seed of fire; the second in order of generation we shall affirm to be air, and the third water. Now one must conceive all these to be so small that none of them,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="56c"/> when taken singly each in its several kind, is seen by us, but when many are collected together their masses are seen. And, moreover, as regards the numerical proportions which govern their masses and motions and their other qualities, we must conceive that God realized these everywhere with exactness, in so far as the nature of Necessity submitted voluntarily or under persuasion, and thus ordered all in harmonious proportion.

                  <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>From all that we have hitherto said about these Kinds,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="56d"/> they will, in all likelihood, behave themselves as follows. Earth will keep moving when it happens to meet with fire and has been dissolved by its acuteness, whether this dissolution takes place in pure fire or in a mass of air or of water; and this motion will continue until the particles of earth happen to meet together somewhere and reunite one with another, when they become earth again; for assuredly earth will never change into another form. But water, when broken up by fire or even by air, is capable of becoming a compound of one corpuscle of fire with two of air;  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="56e"/> and the fractions of air which come from the dissolving of one particle will form two corpuscles of fire. And again, when a small quantity of fire is enclosed by a large quantity of air and water, or of earth, and moves within them as they rush along, and is defeated in its struggle and broken up, then two corpuscles of fire unite to make one form of air. And when air is defeated and disintegrated, from two whole forms of air and a half, one whole form of water will be compounded.</p></said></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>