<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg030.perseus-eng2:10.595</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg030.perseus-eng2:10.595</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg030.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="book" n="10"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="595"><p><said who="#Socrates" rend="merge"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="595"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="595a"/><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">And truly,</q> I said, <q type="spoken">many other considerations assure me that we were entirely right in our organization of the state, and especially, I think, in the matter of poetry.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">In Book III. On the whole question see Introd. Max. Tyr. <title>Diss.</title> 23 <quote xml:lang="grc">Εἰ καλῶς Πλάτων Ὅμηρον τῆς Πολιτείας παρῃτήσατο</quote>, and 32 <quote xml:lang="grc">ἔστι καθ’ Ὅμηρον αἵρεσις</quote>. Strabo i. 2 3. Athenaeus v. 12. 187 says that Plato himself in the <title>Symposium</title> wrote worse things than the poets whom he banishes. Friedländer, <title>Platon,</title> i. p. 138, thinks that the return to the poets in Book X. is intended to justify the poetry of Plato’s dialogues. On the banishment of the poets and Homer cf. also Minucius Felix (Halm), pp. 32-33, Tertullian (Oehler), lib. ii. c. 7, Olympiodorus, Hermann vi. p. 367, Augustine, <title>De civ. Dei,</title> ii. xiv.</note></q> <q type="spoken">What about it?</q> he said. <q type="spoken">In refusing to admit<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Supra 394 D, 568 B, and on 398 A-B, 607 A.</note> at all so much of it as is imitative<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">In the narrower sense. Cf. Vol. I. p. 224, note c, on 392 D, and <title>What Plato Said,</title> p. 561.</note>; for that it is certainly not to be received is, I think,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="595b"/> still more plainly apparent now that we have distinguished the several parts<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Lit. <q type="emph">species.</q> Cf. 435 B ff., 445 C, 580 D, 588 B ff., <title>Phaedr.</title> 271 D, <title>Unity of Plato’s Thought,</title> p. 42.</note> of the soul.</q> <q type="spoken">What do you mean?</q> <q type="spoken">Why, between ourselves<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. <title>Gorg.</title> 462 B, <title>Protag.</title> 309 A, 339 E.</note>—for you will not betray me to the tragic poets and all other imitators—that kind of art seems to be a corruption<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 605 C, <title>Meno</title> 91 C, <title>Laws</title> 890 B.</note> of the mind of all listeners who do not possess, as an antidote<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified"><foreign xml:lang="grc">φάρμακον</foreign>: this passage is the source of Plutarch’s view of literature in education; see <title>Quomodo adolescens poetas audire debeat</title> 15 C.</note> a knowledge of its real nature.</q> <q type="spoken">What is your idea in saying this?</q> he said. <q type="spoken">I must speak out,</q> I said, <q type="spoken">though a certain love and reverence for Homer<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Isoc. ii. 48-49 is perhaps imitating this. For Homer as a source of tragedy cf. also 598 D, 605 C-D, 607 A, 602 B, <title>Theaet.</title> 152 E, schol. Trendelenburg, pp. 75 ff.; Dryden, <title>Discourse on Epic Poetry:</title> <quote>The origin of the stage was from the epic poem . . . those episodes of Homer which were proper for the state the poets amplifies each into an action,</quote> etc. Cf. Aristot. <title>Poet.</title> 1448 b 35 f., Diog. Laert. iv. 40, and 393 A ff.</note> that has possessed me from a boy would stay me from speaking.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="595c"/> For he appears to have been the first teacher and beginner of all these beauties of tragedy. Yet all the same we must not honor a man above truth,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. <title>What Plato Said,</title> p. 532, on <title>Phaedo</title> 91 C, Aristot. <title>Eth. Nic.</title> 1096 a 16 <quote xml:lang="grc">ἄμφοιν γὰρ ὄντοιν φίλοιν ὅσιον προτιμᾶν τὴν ἀλήθειαν</quote>, Henri-Pierre Cazac, <title xml:lang="fre">Polémique d’Aristote contre la théorie platonicienne des Idées,</title> p. 11, n.: <quote xml:lang="fre">Platon lui-même, critiquant Homère, . . . fait une semblabe réflexion, <q type="written">On doit plus d’égards à la vérité qu’à un homme.</q> Cousin croit, après Camérarius, que c’est là l’origine du mot célèbre d’Aristote.</quote> Cf. St. Augustine, <title>De civ. Dei.</title> x. 30 <quote xml:lang="lat">homini praeposuit veritatem.</quote></note> but, as I say, speak our minds.</q> <q type="spoken">By all means,</q> he said. <q type="spoken">Listen, then, or rather, answer my question.</q> <q type="spoken">Ask it,</q> he said. <q type="spoken">Could you tell me in general what imitation is? For neither do I myself quite apprehend what it would be at.</q> <q type="spoken">It is likely, then,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">For <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἦ που</foreign> Cf. <title>Phaedo</title> 84 D.</note></q> he said, <q type="spoken">that <emph>I</emph> should apprehend!</q></said></p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>