<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg023.perseus-eng2:464</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg023.perseus-eng2:464</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg023.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="464"><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>Well, I will try to express what rhetoric appears to me to be:  if it is not in fact what I say, Polus here will refute me.  There are things, I suppose, that you call body and soul?</p></said><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="464"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="464a"/><said who="#Gorgias"><label>Gorg.</label><p>Of course.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>And each of these again you believe to have a good condition?</p></said><said who="#Gorgias"><label>Gorg.</label><p>I do.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>And again, a good condition that may seem so, but is not?  As an example, let me give the following:  many people seem to be in good bodily condition when it would not be easy for anyone but a doctor, or one of the athletic trainers, to perceive that they are not so.</p></said><said who="#Gorgias"><label>Gorg.</label><p>You are right.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>Something of this sort I say there is in body and in soul, which makes the body or the soul seem to be in good condition, though it is none the more so in fact.</p></said><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="464b"/><said who="#Gorgias"><label>Gorg.</label><p>Quite so.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>Now let me see if I can explain my meaning to you more clearly.  There are two different affairs to which I assign two different arts:  the one, which has to do with the soul, I call politics;  the other, which concerns the body, though I cannot give you a single name for it offhand, is all one business, the tendance of the body, which I can designate in two branches as gymnastic and medicine.  Under politics I set legislation in the place of gymnastic, and justice to match medicine.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="464c"/> In each of these pairs, of course—medicine and gymnastic, justice and legislation—there is some intercommunication, as both deal with the same thing;  at the same time they have certain differences.  Now these four, which always bestow their care for the best advantage respectively of the body and the soul, are noticed by the art of flattery which, I do not say with knowledge, but by speculation, divides herself into four parts, and then, insinuating herself into each of those branches, <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="464d"/> pretends to be that into which she has crept, and cares nothing for what is the best, but dangles what is most pleasant for the moment as a bait for folly, and deceives it into thinking that she is of the highest value.  Thus cookery assumes the form of medicine, and pretends to know what foods are best for the body;  so that if a cook and a doctor had to contend before boys, or before men as foolish as boys, as to which of the two, the doctor or the cook, understands the question of sound and noxious foods, <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="464e"/> the doctor would starve to death.</p></said></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>