<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg023.perseus-eng2:463</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg023.perseus-eng2:463</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg023.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="463"><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>I fear it may be too rude to tell the truth;  for I shrink from saying it on Gorgias’ account, lest he suppose I am making satirical fun of his own profession.  Yet indeed I do not know
<milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="463"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="463a"/>whether this is the rhetoric which Gorgias practices, for from our argument just now we got no very clear view as to how he conceives it;  but what I call rhetoric is a part of a certain business which has nothing fine about it.</p></said><said who="#Gorgias"><label>Gorg.</label><p>What is that, Socrates?  Tell us, without scruple on my account.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>It seems to me then, Gorgias, to be a pursuit that is not a matter of art, but showing a shrewd, gallant spirit which has a natural bent for clever dealing with mankind, and I sum up its substance in the name flattery.  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="463b"/> This practice, as I view it, has many branches, and one of them is cookery;  which appears indeed to be an art but, by my account of it, is not an art but a habitude or knack.  I call rhetoric another branch of it, as also personal adornment and sophistry—four branches of it for four kinds of affairs.  So if Polus would inquire, let him inquire:  he has not yet been informed to what sort of branch of flattery <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="463c"/> I assign rhetoric;  but without noticing that I have not yet answered that, he proceeds to ask whether I do not consider it a fine thing.  But I am not going to reply to the question whether I consider rhetoric a fine or a base thing, until I have first answered what it is;  for it would not be fair, Polus:  but if you want the information, ask me what sort of branch of flattery I assert rhetoric to be.</p></said><said who="#Polus"><label>Pol.</label><p>I ask you then;  so answer, what sort of branch it is.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>Now, will you understand when I answer?  Rhetoric, <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="463d"/> by my account, is a semblance<note resp="Loeb" anchored="true">i.e.an unreal image or counterfeit:  Quintilian (ii.  15.25) renders simulacrum.</note> of a branch of politics.</p></said><said who="#Polus"><label>Pol.</label><p>Well then, do you call it a fine or a base thing?</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>A base one, I call it—for all that is bad I call base—since I am to answer you as though you had already understood my meaning.</p></said><said who="#Gorgias"><label>Gorg.</label><p>Nor do I myself, upon my word, Socrates,
	<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="463e"/>grasp your meaning either.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>And no wonder, Gorgias, for as yet my statement is not at all clear;  but Polus<note resp="Loeb" anchored="true">Socrates alludes to the meaning of <foreign xml:lang="grc">πῶλος</foreign> (a colt).</note> here is so young and fresh!</p></said><said who="#Gorgias"><label>Gorg.</label><p>Ah, do not mind him;  but tell me what you mean by rhetoric being a semblance of a branch of politics.</p></said></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>