<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg013.perseus-eng2:118-120</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg013.perseus-eng2:118-120</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg013.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="118"><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> But since it is neither those who know, nor those of the ignorant <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="118"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="118a"/>who know that they do not know, the only people left, I think, are those who do not know, but think that they do?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Yes, only those.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Then this ignorance is a cause of evils, and is the discreditable sort of stupidity?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Yes.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> And when it is about the greatest matters, it is most injurious and base?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> By far.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Well then, can you mention any greater things than the just, the noble, the good, and the expedient?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> No, indeed.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> And it is about these, you say, that you are bewildered?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Yes.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> But if you are bewildered, is it not clear from what has gone before <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="118b"/>that you are not only ignorant of the greatest things, but while not knowing them you think that you do?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> I am afraid so.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Alack then, Alcibiades, for the plight you are in! I shrink indeed from giving it a name, but still, as we are alone, let me speak out. You are wedded to stupidity, my fine friend, of the vilest kind; you are impeached of this by your own words, out of your own mouth; and this, it seems, is why you dash into politics before you have been educated. And you are not alone in this plight, but you share it with most of those who manage our city’s affairs, <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="118c"/>except just a few, and perhaps your guardian, Pericles.</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Yes, you know, Socrates, they say he did not get his wisdom independently, but consorted with many wise men, such as Pythocleides <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb">A musician of <placeName key="tgn,7010867">Ceos</placeName> (who was perhaps also a Pythagorean philosopher) who taught in <placeName key="perseus,Athens">Athens</placeName>.</note> and Anaxagoras <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb">An Ionian philosopher who lived in <placeName key="perseus,Athens">Athens</placeName> c. 480-430 B.C.</note>; and now, old as he is, he still confers with <placeName key="tgn,2274807">Damon</placeName> <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb">An Athenian musician and sophist.</note> for that very purpose.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Well, but did you ever find a man who was wise in anything and yet unable to make another man wise in the same things as himself? For instance, the man who taught you letters was wise himself, and also made you wise, and anyone else he wished to, did he not?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Yes.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="118d"/><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> And you too, who learnt from him, will be able to make another man wise?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Yes.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> And the same holds of the harper and the trainer?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Certainly.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> For, I presume, it is a fine proof of one’s knowing anything that one knows, when one is able to point to another man whom one has made to know it.</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> I agree.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Well then, can you tell me whom Pericles made wise? One of his sons, to begin with?</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="118e"/><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> But what if the two sons of Pericles were simpletons, Socrates?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Well, Cleinias, your brother.</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> But why should you mention Cleinias, a madman?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Well, if Cleinias is mad and the two sons of Pericles were simpletons, what reason are we to assign, in your case, for his allowing you to be in your present condition?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> I believe I am myself to blame for not attending to him.</said></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="119"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="119"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="119a"/><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> But tell me of any other Athenian or foreigner, slave or freeman, who is accounted to have become wiser through converse with Pericles; as I can tell you that Pythodorus <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb">A friend of Zeno: cf. <bibl n="Plat. Parm. 126a">Plat. Parm. 126</bibl>.</note> son of Isolochus, and Callias, <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb">An Athenian general.</note> son of Calliades, became through that of Zeno <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb">Of <placeName key="perseus,Elea">Elea</placeName>, in S. Italy; a disciple of Parmenides who criticized the Pythagorean teaching.</note>; each of them has paid Zeno a hundred minae, <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb">About 600-800 pounds, or the total expenses of two or three years at an English University.</note> and has become both wise and distinguished.</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Well, upon my word, I cannot.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Very good: then what is your intention regarding yourself? Will you remain as you are, or take some trouble?</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="119b"/><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> We must put our heads together, Socrates. And indeed, as soon as you speak, I take the point and agree. For the men who manage the city’s affairs, apart from a few, do strike me as uneducated.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Then what does that mean?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> That if they were educated, I suppose anyone who undertook to contend against them would have to get some knowledge and practice first, as he would for a match with athletes: but now, seeing that these men have gone in for politics as amateurs, what need is there for me to practise and have the trouble of learning? <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="119c"/>For I am sure that my natural powers alone will give me an easy victory over them.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Ho, ho, my good sir, what a thing to say! How unworthy of your looks and your other advantages!</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> What is your meaning now, Socrates? What is the connection?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> I am grieved for you, and for my love.</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Why, pray?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> That you should expect your contest to be with the men we have here.</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Well, but with whom is it to be?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Is that a worthy question to be asked by a man who considers himself high-spirited?</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="119d"/><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> How do you mean? Is not my contest with these men?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Well, suppose you were intending to steer a warship into action, would you be content to be the best hand among the crew at steering or, while regarding this skill as a necessary qualification, would you keep your eye on your actual opponents in the fight, and not, as now, on your fellow-fighters? These, I conceive, you ought so far to surpass that they would not feel fit to be your opponents, but only <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="119e"/>to be your despised fellow-fighters against the enemy, if you mean really to make your mark with some noble action that will be worthy both of yourself and of the city.</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Why, I do mean to.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> So you think it quite fitting for you to be satisfied if you are better than the soldiers, but neglect to keep your eye on the enemy’s leaders with a view to showing yourself better than they are, or to plan and practise against them!</said></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="120"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="120"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="120a"/><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Of whom are you speaking now, Socrates?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Do you not know that our city makes war occasionally on the Spartans and on the Great King?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> That is true.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> And if you are minded to be the head of our state, you would be right in thinking that your contest is with the kings of <placeName key="perseus,Sparta">Sparta</placeName> and of <placeName key="tgn,7000231">Persia</placeName>?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> That sounds like the truth.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> No, my good friend; you ought rather to keep your eye on Meidias <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="120b"/>the quail-filliper <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb">Meidias is mentioned by Aristophanes (<bibl n="Aristoph. Birds 1297">Aristoph. Birds 1297</bibl>) for his skill in the game of filliping quails which were specially trained not to flinch.</note> and others of his sort—who undertake to manage the city’s affairs, while they still have the slavish hair <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb">Slaves in <placeName key="perseus,Athens">Athens</placeName> were largely natives of western <placeName key="tgn,1000004">Asia</placeName>. and had thick, close hair, very different from the wavy locks of the Greeks.</note> (as the women would say) showing in their minds through their lack of culture, and have not yet got rid of it; who, moreover, have come with their outlandish speech to flatter the state, not to rule it—to these, I tell you, should your eyes be turned; and then you can disregard yourself, and need neither learn what is to be learnt for the great contest in which you are to be engaged, nor practise <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="120c"/>what requires practice, and so ensure that you are perfectly prepared before entering upon a political career.</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Why, Socrates, I believe you are right; though I think neither the Spartan generals nor the Persian king are at all different from other people.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> But, my excellent friend, consider what this notion of yours means.</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> In regard to what?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> First of all, do you think you would take more pains over yourself <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="120d"/>if you feared them and thought them terrible, or if you did not?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Clearly, if I thought them terrible.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> And do you think you will come to any harm by taking pains over yourself?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> By no means; rather that I shall get much benefit.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> And on this single count that notion <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb">i.e. about the Spartan generals and the Persian king, <bibl n="Plat. Alc. 1.120c">Plat. Alc.1 120c</bibl>.</note> of yours is so much to the bad.</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> True.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Then, in the second place, observe the probability that it is false.</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> How so?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Is it probable that noble races should produce <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="120e"/>better natures, or not?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> Clearly, noble races would.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> And will not the well-born, provided they are well brought up, probably be perfected in virtue?</said></p><p><said who="#Alcibiades"><label>Alc.</label> That must be so.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Then let us consider, by comparing our lot with theirs, whether the Spartan and Persian kings appear to be of inferior birth. Do we not know that the former are descendants of Hercules and the latter of Achaemenes, and that the line of Hercules and the line of Achaemenes go back to Perseus, son of Zeus?</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>