<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg009.perseus-eng2:134</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg009.perseus-eng2:134</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg009.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="134"><p><said who="#Cephalos" rend="merge"><label>Ceph.</label><said rend="merge">You understand what I mean, do you not?</said><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Certainly,</said> said <placeName key="tgn,2674867">Socrates</placeName>, <said>I understand.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Then knowledge also, if abstract or absolute, would be knowledge of abstract or absolute truth?</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Certainly.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>And likewise each kind of absolute knowledge would be knowledge of each kind of absolute being, would it not?</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Yes.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>And would not the knowledge that exists among us be the knowledge of the truth that exists among us, and each kind of our knowledge <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="134b"/> be the knowledge of each kind of truth that exists among us?</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Yes, that is inevitable.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>But the ideas themselves, as you, agree, we have not, neither can they be among us.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>No, they cannot.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>And the various classes of ideas are known by the absolute idea of knowledge?</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Yes.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Which we do not possess.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>No, we do not.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Then none of the ideas is known by us, since we do not partake of absolute knowledge.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Apparently not.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Then the absolute good and the beautiful and all <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="134c"/> which we conceive to be absolute ideas are unknown to us.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>I am afraid they are.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Now we come to a still more fearful consequence.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>What is it?</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>You would say, no doubt, that if there is an absolute kind of knowledge, it is far more accurate than our knowledge, and the same of beauty and all the rest?</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Yes.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>And if anything partakes of absolute knowledge, you would say that there is no one more likely than God to possess this most accurate knowledge?</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Of course.</said>
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="134d"/>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Then will it be possible for God to know human things, if he has absolute knowledge?</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Why not?</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Because,</said> said Parmenides, <said>we have agreed that those ideas are not relative to our world, nor our world to them, but each only to themselves.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Yes, we have agreed to that.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Then if this most perfect mastership and this most accurate knowledge are with God, his mastership can never rule us, <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="134e"/> nor his knowledge know us or anything of our world; we do not rule the gods with our authority, nor do we know anything of the divine with our knowledge, and by the same reasoning, they likewise, being gods, are not our masters and have no knowledge of human affairs.</said>
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>But surely this,</said> said he, <said>is a most amazing argument, if it makes us deprive God of knowledge.</said></said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>