<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg009.perseus-eng2:131</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg009.perseus-eng2:131</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg009.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="131"><p><said who="#Cephalos" rend="merge"><label>Ceph.</label><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Certainly,</said> said <placeName key="tgn,2674867">Socrates</placeName>.
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Well then, does each participant object partake of the whole idea, or of a part of it?  Or could there be some other third kind of participation?</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>How could there be?</said>  said he.
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Do you think the whole idea, being one, is in each of the many participants, or what?</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Yes, for what prevents it from being in them, Parmenides?</said>  said <placeName key="tgn,2674867">Socrates</placeName>. <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="131b"/> <said>Then while it is one and the same, the whole of it would be in many separate individuals at once, and thus it would itself be separate from itself.</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>No,</said> he replied, <said>for it might be like day, which is one and the same, is in many places at once, and yet is not separated from itself; so each idea, though one and the same, might be in all its participants at once.</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>That,</said> said he, <said>is very neat, <placeName key="tgn,2674867">Socrates</placeName> you make one to be in many places at once, just as if you should spread a sail over many persons and then should say it was one and all of it was over many. <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="131c"/> Is not that about what you mean?</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Perhaps it is,</said> said <placeName key="tgn,2674867">Socrates</placeName>.
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Would the whole sail be over each person, or a particular part over each?</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>A part over each.</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Then,</said> said he, <said>the ideas themselves, <placeName key="tgn,2674867">Socrates</placeName>, are divisible into parts, and the objects which partake of them would partake of a part, and in each of them there would be not the whole, but only a part of each idea.</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>So it appears.</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Are you, then, <placeName key="tgn,2674867">Socrates</placeName>, willing to assert that the one idea is really divided and will still be one?</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>By no means,</said> he replied.
		 	<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>No,</said> said Parmenides, <said>for if you divide absolute greatness, <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="131d"/> and each of the many great things is great by a part of greatness smaller than absolute greatness, is not that unreasonable?</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Certainly,</said> he said.
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Or again, will anything by taking away a particular small part of equality possess something by means of which, when it is less than absolute equality, its possessor will be equal to anything else?</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>That is impossible.</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Or let one of us have a part of the small; the small will be greater than this, since this is a part of it, and therefore the absolute small will be greater; but that to which the part of the small is added will be smaller,
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="131e"/>not greater, than before.</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>That,</said> said he, <said>is impossible.</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>How, then, <placeName key="tgn,2674867">Socrates</placeName>, will other things partake of those ideas of yours, if they cannot partake of them either as parts or as wholes?</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>By Zeus,</said> he replied, <said>I think that is a very hard question to determine.</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Well, what do you think of this?</said>
			<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said>Of what?</said></said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>