<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2:263</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2:263</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="263"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="263"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="263a"/><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> I will, to the best of my ability.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label><q type="emph">Theaetetus sits.</q>  It isn’t a long sentence, is it?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> No, it is fairly short.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Now it is for you to say what it is about and what its subject is.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Clearly it is about me, and I am its subject.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> And how about this sentence?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> What one?</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label><q type="emph">Theaetetus, with whom I am now talking, flies.</q></said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Every one would agree that this also is about me and I am its subject.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> But we agree that every sentence must have some quality.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="263b"/><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Now what quality shall be ascribed to each of these sentences?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> One is false, I suppose, the other true.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> The true one states facts as they are about you.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Certainly.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> And the false one states things that are other than the facts.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> In other words, it speaks of things that are not as if they were.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes, that is pretty much what it does.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> And states with reference to you that things are which are other than things which actually are;  for we said, you know, that in respect to everything there are many things that are and many that are not.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> To be sure.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="263c"/><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Now the second of my sentences about you is in the first place by sheer necessity one of the shortest which conform to our definition of sentence.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> At any rate we just now agreed on that point.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> And secondly it has a subject.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> And if you are not the subject, there is none.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Certainly not.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> And if there is no subject, it would not be a sentence at all;  for we showed that a sentence without a subject is impossible.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Quite right.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="263d"/><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Now when things are said about you, but things other are said as the same and things that are not as things that are, it appears that when such a combination is formed of verbs and nouns we have really and truly false discourse.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes, very truly.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Is it, then, not already plain that the three classes, thought, opinion, and fancy, all arise in our minds as both false and true?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> How is it plain?</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> You will understand more easily if you first grap their natures
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="263e"/>and the several differences between them.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Give me an opportunity.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Well, then, thought and speech are the same;  only the former, which is a silent inner conversation of the soul with itself, has been given the special name of thought.  Is not that true?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Certainly.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> But the stream that flows from the soul in vocal utterance through the mouth has the name of speech?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> True.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> And in speech we know there is just—</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> What?</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Affirmation and negation</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes, we know that.</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>