<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2:241</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2:241</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="241"><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> And therefore a statement will likewise be considered false,
<milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="241"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="241a"/>if it declares that things which are, are not, or that things which are not, are.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> In what other way could a statement be made false?</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Virtually in no other way;  but the sophist will not assent to this.  Or how can any reasonable man assent to it, when the expressions we just agreed upon were previously agreed to be inexpressible, unspeakable, irrational, and inconceivable?  Do we understand his meaning, Theaetetus?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label>  Of course we understand that he will say we are contradicting our recent statements, since we dare to say that falsehood exists in opinions and words; 
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="241b"/>for he will say that we are thus forced repeatedly to attribute being to not-being, although we agreed a while ago that nothing could be more impossible than that.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> You are quite right to remind me.  But I think it is high time to consider what ought to be done about the sophist;  for you see how easily and repeatedly he can raise objections and difficulties, if we conduct our search by putting him in the guild of false-workers and jugglers.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Very true.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Yes, we have gone through only a small part of them,
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="241c"/>and they are, if I may say so, infinite.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> It would, apparently, be impossible to catch the sophist, if that is the case.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Well, then, shall we weaken and give up the struggle now?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> No, I say;  we must not do that, if we can in any way get the slightest hold of the fellow.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Will you then pardon me, and, as your words imply, be content if I somehow withdraw just for a short distance from this strong argument of his?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Of course I will.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="241d"/><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> I have another still more urgent request to make of you.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> What is it?</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Do not assume that I am becoming a sort of parricide.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> What do you mean?</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> In defending myself I shall have to test the theory of my father Parmenides, and contend forcibly that after a fashion not-being is and on the other hand in a sense being is not.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> It is plain that some such contention is necessary.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Yes, plain even to a blind man, as they say;  for unless these statements
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="241e"/>are either disproved or accepted, no one who speaks about false words, or false opinion—whether images or likenesses or imitations or appearances—about the arts which have to do with them, can ever help being forced to contradict himself and make himself ridiculous.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Very true.</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>