<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2:231</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2:231</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="231"><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Well then, who are those who practise this art? 
<milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="231"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="231a"/>I am afraid to say the sophists.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Why so?</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Lest we grant them too high a meed of honor.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> But the description you have just given is very like someone of that sort.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Yes, and a wolf is very like a dog, the wildest like the tamest of animals.  But the cautious man must be especially on his guard in the matter of resemblances, for they are very slippery things.  However, let us agree that they are the sophists;  for I think the strife will not be about petty discriminations
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="231b"/>when people are sufficiently on their guard.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> No, probably not.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Then let it be agreed that part of the discriminating art is purification, and as part of purification let that which is concerned with the soul be separated off, and as part of this, instruction, and as part of instruction, education;  and let us agree that the cross-questioning of empty conceit of wisdom, which has come to light in our present discussion, is nothing else than the true-born art of sophistry.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label>  Let us agree to all that;  but the sophist has by this time appeared to be so many things that I am at a loss
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="231c"/>to know what in the world to say he really is, with any assurance that I am speaking the truth.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> No wonder you are at a loss.  But it is fair to suppose that by this time he is still more at a loss to know how he can any longer elude our argument;  for the proverb is right which says it is not easy to escape all the wrestler’s grips.  So now we must attack him with redoubled vigor.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> You are right.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> First, then, let us stop to take breath and while we are resting let us count up
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="231d"/>the number of forms in which the sophist has appeared to us.  First, I believe, he was found to be a paid hunter after the young and wealthy.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> And secondly a kind of merchant in articles of knowledge for the soul.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Certainly.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> And thirdly did he not turn up as a retailer of these same articles of knowledge?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes, and fourthly we found he was a seller of his own productions of knowledge.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Your memory is good;  but I will try to recall the fifth case myself.  He was an athlete
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="231e"/>in contests of words, who had taken for his own the art of disputation.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes, he was.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> The sixth case was doubtful, but nevertheless we agreed to consider him a purger of souls, who removes opinions that obstruct learning.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Very true.</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>