<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2:226</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2:226</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="226"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="226"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="226a"/><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Yes, and  the  sophist is nothing  else, apparently, than the money-making class of the disputatious, argumentative, controversial, pugnacious, combative, acquisitive art, as our argument has now again stated.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Certainly.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Do you see the truth of the statement that this creature is many-sided and, as the saying is, not to be caught with one hand?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Then we must catch him with both.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Yes, we must, and must go at it with all our might,
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="226b"/>by following another track of his—in this way.  Tell me;  of the expressions connected with menial occupations some are in common use, are they not?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes, many.  But to which of the many does your question refer?</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> To such as these:  we say <q type="emph">sift</q> and <q type="emph">strain</q> and <q type="emph">winnow</q> and <q type="emph">separate.</q> <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb">Apparently a term descriptive of some part of the process of weaving;  cf. <bibl n="Plat. Crat. 338b">Plat. Crat.  338b</bibl>.</note></said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Certainly.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> And besides these there are <q type="emph">card</q> and <q type="emph">comb</q> and <q type="emph">beat the web</q> and countless other technical terms which we know.  Is it not so?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Why do you use these as examples and ask about them all? 
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="226c"/>What do you wish to show in regard to them?</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> All those that I have mentioned imply a notion of division.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Then since there is, accorling to my reckoning, one art involved in all of these operations, let us give it one name.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> What shall we call it?</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> The art of discrimination.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Very well.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Now see if we can discover two divisions of this.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> You demand quick thinking, for a boy like me.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="226d"/><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> And yet, in the instance of discrimination just mentioned there was, first, the separation of worse from better, and, secondly, of like from like.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes, as you now express it, that is pretty clear.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Now I know no common name for the second kind of discrimination;  but I do know the name of the kind which retains the better and throws away the worse.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> What is it?</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Every such discrimination, as I think, is universally called a sort of purification.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes, so it is.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="226e"/><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> And could not anyone see that purification is of two kinds?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> Yes, perhaps, in time;  but still I do not see it now.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Still there are many kinds of purifications of bodies, and they may all properly be included under one name.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>Theaet.</label> What are they and what is the name?</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>