<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2:217</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2:217</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg007.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="217"><p><said who="#Theodorus"><label>Theo.</label> What matters do you mean?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Sophist, statesman, philosopher.</said></p><p><said who="#Theodorus"><label>Theo.</label> What particular difficulty and what kind of difficulty in regard to them is it about which you had in mind to ask?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> It is this:  Did they consider all these one, or two, or, as there are three names, did they divide them into three classes and ascribe to each a class, corresponding to a single name?</said></p><p><said who="#Theodorus"><label>Theo.</label> I think he has no objection to talking about them.  What do you say, stranger?</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="217b"/><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Just what you did, Theodorus;  for I have no objection, and it is not difficult to say that they considered them three.  But it is no small or easy task to define clearly the nature of each.</said></p><p><said who="#Theodorus"><label>Theo.</label> The fact is, Socrates, that by chance you have hit upon a question very like what we happened to be asking him before we came here; and he made excuses to us then, as he does now to you;  though he admits that he has heard it thoroughly discussed and remembers what he heard.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="217c"/><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> In that case, stranger, do not refuse us the first favor we have asked;  but just tell us this:  Do you generally prefer to expound in a long uninterrupted speech of your own whatever you wish to explain to anyone, or do you prefer the method of questions?  I was present once when Parmenides employed the latter method and carried on a splendid discussion.  I was a young man then, and he was very old.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> The method of dialogue, Socrates, is easier
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="217d"/>with an interlocutor who is tractable and gives no trouble;  but otherwise I prefer the continuous speech by one person.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Well, you may choose whomever you please of those present;  they will all respond pleasantly to you;  but if you take my advice you will choose one of the young fellows, Theaetetus here, or any of the others who suits you.</said></p><p><said who="#Stranger"><label>Str.</label> Socrates, this is the first time I have come among you, and I am somewhat ashamed, instead of carrying on the discussion by merely giving brief replies to your questions, to deliver an extended, long drawn out speech, either as an address of my own
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="217e"/>or in reply to another, as if I were giving an exhibition;  but I must, for really the present subject is not what one might expect from the form of the question, but is a matter for very long speech.  On the other hand it seems unfriendly and discourteous to refuse a favor to you and these gentlemen, especially when you have spoken as you did.  As for
<milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="218"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="218a"/>Theaetetus I accept him most willingly as interlocutor in view of my previous conversation with him and of your present recommendation.</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>