<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg006.perseus-eng2:148-150</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg006.perseus-eng2:148-150</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg006.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="148"><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> The numbers between these, such as three

<milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="148"/><milestone n="148a" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
	
and five and all numbers which cannot be formed by multiplying equal factors, but only by multiplying a greater by a less or a less by a greater, and are therefore always contained in unequal sides, we represented by the shape of the oblong rectangle and called oblong numbers.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Very good;  and what next?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> All the lines which form the four sides of the equilateral or square numbers we called lengths, and those which form the oblong numbers we called surds, because they are not commensurable with the others
<milestone n="148b" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
in length, but only in the areas of the planes which they have the power to form.  And similarly in the case of solids. <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb">That is, cubes and cube roots.</note></said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Most excellent, my boys!  I think Theodorus will not be found liable to an action for false witness.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> But really, Socrates, I cannot answer that question of yours about knowledge, as we answered the question about length and square roots.  And yet you seem to me to want something of that kind.  So Theodorus appears to be a false witness after all.</said></p><milestone n="148c" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Nonsense!  If he were praising your running and said he had never met any young man who was so good a runner, and then you were beaten in a race by a full grown man who held the record, do you think his praise would be any less truthful?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> Why, no.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> And do you think that the discovery of knowledge, as I was just now saying, is a small matter and not a task for the very ablest men?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> By Zeus, I think it is a task for the very ablest.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Then you must have confidence in yourself, and believe that Theodorus is right,
<milestone n="148d" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
and try earnestly in every way to gain an understanding of the nature of knowledge as well as of other things.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> If it is a question of earnestness, Socrates, the truth will come to light.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Well then—for you pointed out the way admirably just now—take your answer about the roots as a model, and just as you embraced them all in one class, though they were many, try to designate the many forms of knowledge by one definition.</said></p><milestone n="148e" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> But I assure you, Socrates, I have often tried to work that out, when I heard reports of the questions that you asked, but I can neither persuade myself that I have any satisfactory answer, nor can I find anyone else who gives the kind of answer you insist upon;  and yet, on the other hand, I cannot get rid of a feeling of concern about the matter.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Yes, you are suffering the pangs of labor, Theaetetus, because you are not empty, but pregnant.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> I do not know, Socrates;  I merely tell you what I feel.</said></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="149"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="149"/><milestone n="149a" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Have you then not heard, you absurd boy, that I am the son of a noble and burly midwife, Phaenarete?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> Yes, I have heard that.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> And have you also heard that I practise the same art?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> No, never.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> But I assure you it is true;  only do not tell on me to the others;  for it is not known that I possess this art.  But other people, since they do not know it, do not say this of me, but say that I am a most eccentric person and drive men to distraction.  Have you heard that also?</said></p><milestone n="149b" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> Yes, I have.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Shall I tell you the reason then?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> Oh yes, do.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Just take into consideration the whole business of the midwives, and you will understand more easily what I mean.  For you know, I suppose, that no one of them attends other women while she is still capable of conceiving and bearing but only those do so who have become too old to bear.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> Yes, certainly.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> They say the cause of this is Artemis, because she, a childless goddess, has had childbirth allotted to her as her special province.  Now it would seem she did not allow
<milestone n="149c" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
barren women to be midwives, because human nature is too weak to acquire an art which deals with matters of which it has no experience, but she gave the office to those who on account of age were not bearing children, honoring them for their likeness to herself.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> Very likely.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Is it not, then, also likely and even necessary, that midwives should know better than anyone else who are pregnant and who are not?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> Certainly.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> And furthermore, the midwives, by means of drugs
<milestone n="149d" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
and incantations, are able to arouse the pangs of labor and, if they wish, to make them milder, and to cause those to bear who have difficulty in bearing;  and they cause miscarriages if they think them desirable.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> That is true.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Well, have you noticed this also about them, that they are the most skillful of matchmakers, since they are very wise in knowing what union of man and woman will produce the best possible children?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> I do not know that at all.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> But be assured that they are prouder of this
<milestone n="149e" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
than of their skill in cutting the umbilical cord.  Just consider.  Do you think the knowledge of what soil is best for each plant or seed belongs to the same art as the tending and harvesting of the fruits of the earth, or to another?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> To the same art.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> And in the case of a woman, do you think, my friend, that there is one art for the sowing and another for the harvesting?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> It is not likely.</said></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="150"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="150"/><milestone n="150a" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> No;  but because there is a wrongful and unscientific way of bringing men and women together, which is called pandering, the midwives, since they are women of dignity and worth, avoid matchmaking, through fear of falling under the charge of pandering.  And yet the true midwife is the only proper match-maker.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> It seems so.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> So great, then, is the importance of midwives;  but their function is less important than mine.  For women do not, like my patients, bring forth
<milestone n="150b" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
at one time real children and at another mere images which it is difficult to distinguish from the real.  For if they did, the greatest and noblest part of the work of the midwives would be in distinguishing between the real and the false.  Do you not think so?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> Yes, I do.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> All that is true of their art of midwifery is true also of mine, but mine differs from theirs in being practised upon men, not women, and in tending their souls in labor, not their bodies.  But the greatest thing about my art is this,
<milestone n="150c" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
that it can test in every way whether the mind of the young man is bringing forth a mere image, an imposture, or a real and genuine offspring.  For I have this in common with the midwives:  I am sterile in point of wisdom, and the reproach which has often been brought against me, that I question others but make no reply myself about anything, because I have no wisdom in me, is a true reproach;  and the reason of it is this:  the god compels me to act as midwife, but has never allowed me to bring forth.  I am, then, not at all a wise person myself,
<milestone n="150d" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
nor have I any wise invention, the offspring born of my own soul;  but those who associate with me, although at first some of them seem very ignorant, yet, as our acquaintance advances, all of them to whom the god is gracious make wonderful progress, not only in their own opinion, but in that of others as well.  And it is clear that they do this, not because they have ever learned anything from me, but because they have found in themselves many fair things and have brought them forth.  But the delivery is due to the god and me.  And the proof of it is this:  many before now,
<milestone n="150e" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
being ignorant of this fact and thinking that they were themselves the cause of their success, but despising me, have gone away from me sooner than they ought, whether of their own accord or because others persuaded them to do so.  Then, after they have gone away, they have miscarried thenceforth on account of evil companionship, and the offspring which they had brought forth through my assistance they have reared so badly that they have lost it;  they have considered impostures and images of more importance than the truth, and at last it was evident to themselves, as well as to others, that they were ignorant.</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>