<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg005.perseus-eng2:411-412</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg005.perseus-eng2:411-412</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg005.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="411"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="411"/><milestone n="411a" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Now after the class of words you, have explained, I should like to examine the correctness of the noble words that relate to virtue, such as wisdom, intelligence, justice, and all the others of that sort.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> You are stirring up a mighty tribe of words, my friend;  however, since I have put on the lion helmet, I must not play the coward, but must, it seems, examine wisdom, intelligence, thought, knowledge,
<milestone n="411b" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>and all the other noble words of which you speak.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Certainly we must not stop until that is done.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> By dog, I believe I have a fine intuition which has just come to me, that the very ancient men who invented names were quite like most of the present philosophers who always get dizzy as they turn round and round in their search for the nature of things, and then the things seem to them to turn round and round and be in motion.
<milestone n="411c" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>They think the cause of this belief is not an affection within themselves, but that the nature of things really is such that nothing is at rest or stable, but everything is flowing and moving and always full of constant motion and generation.  I say this because I thought of it with reference to all these words we are now considering.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> How is that, Socrates?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Perhaps you did not observe that the names we just mentioned are given under the assumption that the things named are moving and flowing and being generated.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> No, I did not notice that at all.
<milestone n="411d" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/></said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Surely the first one we mentioned is subject to such assumptions.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> What is the word ?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Wisdom (<foreign xml:lang="grc">φρόνησις</foreign>);  for it is perception (<foreign xml:lang="grc">νόησις</foreign>) of motion (<foreign xml:lang="grc">φορᾶς</foreign>) and flowing (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ῥοῦ</foreign>);  or it might be understood as benefit (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὄνησις</foreign>) of motion (<foreign xml:lang="grc">φορᾶς</foreign>);  in either case it has to do with motion.  And <foreign xml:lang="grc">γνώμη</foreign> (thought), if you please, certainly denotes contemplation and consideration of generation (<foreign xml:lang="grc">γονῆς νώμησις</foreign>);  for to consider is the same as to contemplate.  Or, if you please, <foreign xml:lang="grc">νόησις</foreign> (intelligence) is merely <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἕσις</foreign> (desire) <foreign xml:lang="grc">τοῦ νεοῦ</foreign> (of the new);  but that things are new shows that they are always being generated;
<milestone n="411e" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>therefore the soul’s desire for generation is declared by the giver of the name <foreign xml:lang="grc">νεόεσις</foreign>;  for in antiquity the name was not <foreign xml:lang="grc">νόησις</foreign>, but two epsilons had to be spoken instead of the eta.</said></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="412"><p><said who="#Socrates" rend="merge"><label>Socrates.</label><foreign xml:lang="grc">Σωφροσύνη</foreign> (self-restraint) is <foreign xml:lang="grc">σωτηρία</foreign> (salvation) of <foreign xml:lang="grc">φρόνησις</foreign> (wisdom), which we have just been discussing.
<milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="412"/><milestone n="412a" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>And <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπιστήμη</foreign> (knowledge) indicates that the soul which is of any account accompanies (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἕπεται</foreign>) things in their motion, neither falling behind them nor running in front of them;  therefore we ought to insert an epsilon and call it <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπεϊστήμη</foreign>.  <foreign xml:lang="grc">Σύνεσις</foreign> (intelligence) in its turn is a kind of reckoning together;  when one says <foreign xml:lang="grc">συνιέναι</foreign> (understand), the same thing as <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπίστασθαι</foreign> is said;
<milestone n="412b" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>for <foreign xml:lang="grc">συνιέναι</foreign> means that the soul goes with things.  Certainly <foreign xml:lang="grc">σοφία</foreign> (wisdom) denotes the touching of motion.  This word is very obscure and of foreign origin;  but we must remember that the poets often say of something which begins to advance <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐσύθη</foreign> (it rushed).  There was a famous Laconian whose name was <foreign xml:lang="grc">Σοῦς</foreign> (Rush), for this is the Laconian word for rapid motion.  Now <foreign xml:lang="grc">σοφία</foreign> signifies the touching (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπαφή</foreign>) of this rapid motion, the assumption being that things are in motion.  And the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀγαθόν</foreign> (good)
<milestone n="412c" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>is intended to denote the admirable (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀγαστόν</foreign>) in all nature.  For since all things are in motion, they possess quickness and slowness;  now not all that is swift, but only part of it, is admirable;  this name <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀγαθόν</foreign> is therefore given to the admirable (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀγαστόν</foreign>) part of the swift (<foreign xml:lang="grc">θοοῦ</foreign>).<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>It is easy to conjecture that the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">δικαιασύνη</foreign> applies to the understanding (<foreign xml:lang="grc">σύνεσις</foreign>) of the just (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τοῦ διαίον</foreign>) but the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">δίκαιον</foreign> (just) is itself difficult.  Up to a certain point, you see, many men seem to agree about it, but beyond that they differ.
<milestone n="412d" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>For those who think the universe is in motion believe that the greater part of it is of such a nature as to be a mere receptacle, and that there is some element which passes through all this, by means of which all created things are generated.  And this element must be very rapid and very subtle;  for it could not pass through all the universe unless it were very subtle, so that nothing could keep it out, and it must be very swift, so that all other things are relatively at rest.  Since, then, it superintends and passes through (<foreign xml:lang="grc">διαϊόν</foreign>) all other things,
<milestone n="412e" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>this is rightly called by the name <foreign xml:lang="grc">δίκαιον</foreign>, the sound of the kappa being added merely for the sake of euphony.</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>