<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:99-100</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:99-100</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="99"><p><said who="#Phaedo" rend="merge"><label>Phaedo.</label><q type="spoken" rend="merge">
                    
                    But it is most absurd to call
                    things of that sort causes. If anyone were to say that I could not have done
                    what I thought proper if I had not bones and sinews and other things that I
                    have, he would be right. But to say that those things are the cause of my doing
                    what I do, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="99b"/>
            and that I act with intelligence
                    but not from the choice of what is best, would be an extremely careless way of
                    talking. Whoever talks in that way is unable to make a distinction and to see
                    that in reality a cause is one thing, and the thing without which the cause
                    could never be a cause is quite another thing. And so it seems to me that most
                    people, when they give the name of cause to the latter, are groping in the dark,
                    as it were, and are giving it a name that does not belong to it. And so one man
                    makes the earth stay below the heavens by putting a vortex about it, and another
                    regards the earth as a flat trough supported on a foundation of air; but they do
                    not look for 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="99c"/>
            the power which causes things to
                    be now placed as it is best for them to be placed, nor do they think it has any
                    divine force, but they think they can find a new Atlas more powerful and more
                    immortal and more all-embracing than this, and in truth they give no thought to
                    the good, which must embrace and hold together all things. Now I would gladly be
                    the pupil of anyone who would teach me the nature of such a cause; but since
                    that was denied me and I was not able to discover it myself or to learn of it
                    from anyone else, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="99d"/>
            do you wish me,
                    Cebes,</q> said he, <q type="spoken">to give you an account of the way in which I have
                    conducted my second voyage in quest of the cause?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">I wish it with all my heart,</q> he
                        replied.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">After this, then,</q> said
                    he, <q type="spoken">since I had given up investigating realities, I decided that I must
                    be careful not to suffer the misfortune which happens to people who look at the
                    sun and watch it during an eclipse. For some of them ruin their eyes unless they
                    look at its image in water 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="99e"/>
            or something of
                    the sort. I thought of that danger, and I was afraid my soul would be blinded if
                    I looked at things with my eyes and tried to grasp them with any of my senses.
                    So I thought I must have recourse to conceptions and examine in them the truth
                    of realities.</q></said></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="100"><p><said who="#Phaedo" rend="merge"><label>Phaedo.</label><q type="spoken" rend="merge">
                            Now perhaps my metaphor <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="100"/>
            
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="100a"/>
            is not quite accurate; for I do not grant in the
                    least that he who studies realities by means of conceptions is looking at them
                    in images any more than he who studies them in the facts of daily life. However,
                    that is the way I began. I assume in each case some principle which I consider
                    strongest, and whatever seems to me to agree with this, whether relating to
                    cause or to anything else, I regard as true, and whatever disagrees with it, as
                    untrue. But I want to tell you more clearly what I mean; for I think you do not
                    understand now.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Not very well,
                    certainly,</q> said Cebes. 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="100b"/>
            <q type="spoken">Well,</q> said Socrates, <q type="spoken">this is what I mean. It is nothing
                    new, but the same thing I have always been saying, both in our previous
                    conversation and elsewhere. I am going to try to explain to you the nature of
                    that cause which I have been studying, and I will revert to those familiar
                    subjects of ours as my point of departure and assume that there are such things
                    as absolute beauty and good and greatness and the like. If you grant this and
                    agree that these exist, I believe I shall explain cause to you and shall prove
                    that 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="100c"/>
            the soul is immortal.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">You may assume,</q> said Cebes, <q type="spoken">that I
                    grant it, and go on.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Then,</q>
                    said he, <q type="spoken">see if you agree with me in the next step. I think that if
                    anything is beautiful besides absolute beauty it is beautiful for no other
                    reason than because it partakes of absolute beauty; and this applies to
                    everything. Do you assent to this view of cause?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">I do,</q> said he.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Now I do not yet, understand,</q> he went on, <q type="spoken">nor can I
                    perceive those other ingenious causes. If anyone tells me that what makes a
                    thing beautiful is its lovely color, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="100d"/>
            or its
                    shape or anything else of the sort, I let all that go, for all those things
                    confuse me, and I hold simply and plainly and perhaps foolishly to this, that
                    nothing else makes it beautiful but the presence or communion (call it which you
                    please) of absolute beauty, however it may have been gained; about the way in
                    which it happens, I make no positive statement as yet, but I do insist that
                    beautiful things are made beautiful by beauty. For I think this is the safest
                    answer I can give to myself or to others, and if I cleave fast to this,
                        
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="100e"/>
            I think I shall never be overthrown, and
                    I believe it is safe for me or anyone else to give this answer, that beautiful
                    things are beautiful through beauty. Do you agree?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">I do.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">And
                    great things are great and greater things greater by greatness, and smaller
                    things smaller by smallness?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Yes.</q></said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>