<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:97-98</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:97-98</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="97"><p><said who="#Phaedo" rend="merge"><label>Phaedo.</label><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">By Zeus,</q> said he, <q type="spoken">I am far from thinking that I know the
                    cause of any of these things, I who do not even dare to say, when one is added
                    to one, whether the one to which the addition was made has become two, or the
                    one which was added, or the one which was added and <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="97"/>
            
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="97a"/>
            the one to which it was added
                    became two by the addition of each to the other. I think it is wonderful that
                    when each of them was separate from the other, each was one and they were not
                    then two, and when they were brought near each other this juxtaposition was the
                    cause of their becoming two. And I cannot yet believe that if one is divided,
                    the division causes it to become two; for this is the opposite of 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="97b"/>
            the cause which produced two in the former case; for
                    then two arose because one was brought near and added to another one, and now
                    because one is removed and separated from other. And I no longer believe that I
                    know by this method even how one is generated or, in a word, how anything is
                    generated or is destroyed or exists, and I no longer admit this method, but have
                    another confused way of my own.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Then one
                    day I heard a man reading from a book, as he said, by Anaxagoras, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="97c"/>
            that it is the mind that arranges and causes all
                    things. I was pleased with this theory of cause, and it seemed to me to be
                    somehow right that the mind should be the cause of all things, and I thought,
                    <q type="thought">If this is so, the mind in arranging things arranges everything and establishes
                    each thing as it is best for it to be. So if anyone wishes to find the cause of
                    the generation or destruction or existence of a particular thing, he must find
                    out what sort of existence, or passive state of any kind, or activity is best
                    for it. And therefore in respect to 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="97d"/>
            that
                    particular thing, and other things too, a man need examine nothing but what is
                    best and most excellent; for then he will necessarily know also what is
                    inferior, since the science of both is the same.</q> As I considered these things I
                    was delighted to think that I had found in Anaxagoras a teacher of the cause of
                    things quite to my mind, and I thought he would tell me whether the earth is
                    flat or round, and when 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="97e"/>
            he had told me that,
                    would go on to explain the cause and the necessity of it, and would tell me the
                    nature of the best and why it is best for the earth to be as it is; and if he
                    said the earth was in the center, he would proceed to show that it is best for
                    it to be in the center; and I had made up my mind that <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="98"/>
            
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="98a"/>
            if he made those things clear to
            me, I would no longer yearn for any other kind of cause.</q></said></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="98"><p><said who="#Phaedo" rend="merge"><label>Phaedo.</label><q type="spoken" rend="merge">And I had determined
                    that I would find out in the same way about the sun and the moon and the other
                    stars, their relative speed, their revolutions, and their other changes, and why
                    the active or passive condition of each of them is for the best. For I never
                    imagined that, when he said they were ordered by intelligence, he would
                    introduce any other cause for these things than that it it is best for them to
                    be as they are. 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="98b"/>
            So I thought when he assigned
                    the cause of each thing and of all things in common he would go on and explain
                    what is best for each and what is good for all in common. I prized my hopes very
                    highly, and I seized the books very eagerly and read them as fast as I could,
                    that I might know as fast as I could about the best and the worst.
                            <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>My glorious hope, my friend, was quickly snatched
                    away from me. As I went on with my reading I saw that the man made no use of
                    intelligence, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="98c"/>
            and did not assign any real
                    causes for the ordering of things, but mentioned as causes air and ether and
                    water and many other absurdities. And it seemed to me it was very much as if one
                    should say that Socrates does with intelligence whatever he does, and then, in
                    trying to give the causes of the particular thing I do, should say first that I
                    am now sitting here because my body is composed of bones and sinews, and the
                    bones are hard and have joints which divide them and the sinews 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="98d"/>
            can be contracted and relaxed and, with the flesh
                    and the skin which contains them all, are laid about the bones; and so, as the
                    bones are hung loose in their ligaments, the sinews, by relaxing and
                    contracting, make me able to bend my limbs now, and that is the cause of my
                    sitting here with my legs bent. Or as if in the same way he should give voice
                    and air and hearing and countless other things of the sort as causes for our
                    talking with each other, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="98e"/>
            and should fail to
                    mention the real causes, which are, that the Athenians decided that it was best
                    to condemn me, and therefore I have decided that it was best for me to sit here
                    and that it is right for me to stay and undergo whatever penalty they order.
                    <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="99"/>
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="99a"/>
                        For, by
                    Dog, I fancy these bones and sinews of mine would have been in <placeName key="perseus,Megara">Megara</placeName> or <placeName key="tgn,7002683">Boeotia</placeName> long ago, carried thither by an opinion of what was
                    best, if I did not think it was better and nobler to endure any penalty the city
                    may inflict rather than to escape and run away. </q></said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>