<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:95-96</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:95-96</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="95"><p><said who="#Phaedo" rend="merge"><label>Phaedo.</label><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Then, my good friend, it will never do for us to
                    say that the soul is a harmony; for we should, it seems, <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="95"/>
            
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="95a"/>
            agree neither with Homer, the
                    divine poet, nor with ourselves.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">That is true,</q> said he.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Very
                    well,</q> said Socrates, <q type="spoken">Harmonia, the Theban goddess, has, it seems,
                    been moderately gracious to us; but how, Cebes, and by what argument can we find
                    grace in the sight of Cadmus?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">I
                    think,</q> said Cebes, <q type="spoken">you will find a way. At any rate, you conducted
                    this argument against harmony wonderfully and better than I expected. For when
                    Simmias was telling of his difficulty, I wondered if anyone could make head
                    against 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="95b"/>
            his argument; so it seemed to me very
                    remarkable that it could not withstand the first attack of your argument. Now I
                    should not be surprised if the argument of Cadmus met with the same
                        fate.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">My friend,</q> said
                    Socrates, <q type="spoken">do not be boastful, lest some evil eye put to rout the argument
                    that is to come. That, however, is in the hands of God. Let us, in Homeric
                    fashion, charge the foe and test the worth of what you say. Now the sum total of
                    what you seek is this: You demand a proof that our soul is indestructible
                        
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="95c"/>
            and immortal, if the philosopher, who is
                    confident in the face of death and who thinks that after death he will fare
                    better in the other world than if he had lived his life differently, is not to
                    find his confidence senseless and foolish. And although we show that the soul is
                    strong and godlike and existed before we men were born as men, all this, you
                    say, may bear witness not to immortality, but only to the fact that the soul
                    lasts a long while, and existed somewhere an immeasurably long time before our
                    birth, and knew and did various things; yet it was none the more immortal for
                    all that, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="95d"/>
            but its very entrance into the
                    human body was the beginning of its dissolution, a disease, as it were; and it
                    lives in toil through this life and finally perishes in what we call death. Now
                    it makes no difference, you say, whether a soul enters into a body once or many
                    times, so far as the fear each of us feels is concerned; for anyone, unless he
                    is a fool, must fear, if he does not know and cannot prove that the soul is
                    immortal. That, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="95e"/>
            Cebes, is, I think, about
                    what you mean. And I restate it purposely that nothing may escape us and that
                    you may, if you wish, add or take away anything.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>And Cebes said, <q type="spoken">I do not at present wish to take
                    anything away or to add anything. You have expressed my
                        meaning.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Socrates paused for some time
                    and was absorbed in thought. Then he said: <q type="spoken">It is no small thing that you
                    seek; for the cause of generation and decay must be completely investigated.</q></said></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="96"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="96"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="96a"/><p><said who="#Phaedo" rend="merge"><label>Phaedo.</label><q type="spoken" rend="merge">Now I will
                    tell you my own experience in the matter, if you wish; then if anything I say
                    seems to you to be of any use, you can employ it for the solution of your
                        difficulty.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Certainly,</q>
                    said Cebes, <q type="spoken">I wish to hear your experiences.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Listen then, and I will tell you. When I was young,
                    Cebes, I was tremendously eager for the kind of wisdom which they call
                    investigation of nature. I thought it was a glorious thing to know the causes of
                    everything, why each thing comes into being and why it perishes and why it
                    exists; 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="96b"/>
            and I was always unsettling myself
                    with such questions as these: Do heat and cold, by a sort of fermentation, bring
                    about the organization of animals, as some people say? Is it the blood, or air,
                    or fire by which we think? Or is it none of these, and does the brain furnish
                    the sensations of hearing and sight and smell, and do memory and opinion arise
                    from these, and does knowledge come from memory and opinion in a state of rest?
                    And again I tried to find out 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="96c"/>
            how these
                    things perish, and I investigated the phenomena of heaven and earth until
                    finally I made up my mind that I was by nature totally unfitted for this kind of
                    investigation. And I will give you a sufficient proof of this. I was so
                    completely blinded by these studies that I lost the knowledge that I, and others
                    also, thought I had before; I forgot what I had formerly believed I knew about
                    many things and even about the cause of man’s growth. For I had thought
                    previously that it was plain to everyone that man grows through eating and
                        
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="96d"/>
            drinking; for when, from the food he
                    eats, flesh is added to his flesh and bones to his bones, and in the same way
                    the appropriate thing is added to each of his other parts, then the small bulk
                    becomes greater and the small man large. That is what I used to think. Doesn’t
                    that seem to you reasonable?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Yes,</q> said Cebes.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Now listen
                    to this, too. I thought I was sure enough, when I saw a tall man standing by a
                    short one, that he was, say, taller by a head than the other, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="96e"/>
            and that one horse was larger by a head than another horse;
                    and, to mention still clearer things than those, I thought ten were more than
                    eight because two had been added to the eight, and I thought a two-cubit rule
                    was longer than a one-cubit rule because it exceeded it by half its
                        length.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">And now,</q> said
    Cebes, <q type="spoken">what do you think about them?</q></said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>