<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:72</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:72</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="72"><p><said who="#Phaedo" rend="merge"><label>Phaedo.</label><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Then,</q> said Socrates, <q type="spoken">if there be such a
                    thing as <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="72"/>
            
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="72a"/>
            coming to life again, this would be the process of generation from the dead to
                    the living?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Certainly.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">So by this
                    method also we reach the conclusion that the living are generated from the dead,
                    just as much as the dead from the living; and since this is the case, it seems
                    to me to be a sufficient proof that the souls of the dead exist somewhere,
                    whence they come back to life.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">I
                    think, Socrates, that results necessarily from our previous
                        admissions.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Now here is another
                    method, Cebes, to prove, as it seems to me, that we were right in making those
                    admissions. 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="72b"/>
            For if generation did not proceed
                    from opposite to opposite and back again, going round, as it were in a circle,
                    but always went forward in a straight line without turning back or curving,
                    then, you know, in the end all things would have the same form and be acted upon
                    in the same way and stop being generated at all.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">What do you mean?</q> said he.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">It is not at all hard,</q> said Socrates, <q type="spoken">to
                    understand what I mean. For example, if the process of falling asleep existed,
                    but not the opposite process of waking from sleep, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="72c"/>
            in the end, you know, that would make the sleeping Endymion
                    mere nonsense; he would be nowhere, for everything else would be in the same
                    state as he, sound asleep. Or if all thing were mixed together and never
                    separated, the saying of Anaxagoras, all things are chaos, would soon come true.
                    And in like manner, my dear Cebes, if all things that have life should die, and,
                    when they had died, the dead should remain in that condition, is it not
                    inevitable that at last all things would be dead 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="72d"/>
            and nothing alive? For if the living were generated from any
                    other things than from the dead, and the living were to die, is there any escape
                    from the final result that all things would be swallowed up in
                        death?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">I see none,
                    Socrates,</q> said Cebes. <q type="spoken">What you say seems to be perfectly
                        true.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">I think, Cebes,</q>
                    said he, <q type="spoken">it is absolutely so, and we are not deluded in making these
                    admissions, but the return to life is an actual fact, and it is a fact that the
                    living are generated from the dead and that the souls of the dead 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="72e"/>
            exist.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">And besides,</q> Cebes rejoined, <q type="spoken">if it is true, Socrates, as
                    you are fond of saying, that our learning is nothing else than recollection,
                    then this would be an additional argument that we must necessarily have learned
                    in some previous time what we now remember.</q></said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>