<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:71</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:71</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="71"><p><said who="#Phaedo" rend="merge"><label>Phaedo.</label><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">And if it becomes
                    smaller, <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="71"/>
            
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="71a"/>
            it
                    must have been greater and then have become smaller?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">That is true,</q> said he.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">And the weaker is generated from the stronger, and the
                    slower from the quicker?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Certainly.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">And the
                    worse from the better and the more just from the more unjust?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Of course.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Then,</q> said he, <q type="spoken">we have this fact sufficiently
                    established, that all things are generated in this way, opposites from
                        opposites?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Certainly.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Now then, is
                    there between all these pairs of opposites what may be called 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="71b"/>
            two kinds of generation, from one to the other and back
                    again from the other to the first? Between a larger thing and a smaller thing
                    there is increment and diminution and we call one increasing and the other
                    decreasing, do we not?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Yes,</q>
                    said he.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">And similarly analyzing and
                    combining, and cooling and heating, and all opposites in the same way. Even if
                    we do not in every case have the words to express it, yet in fact is it not
                    always inevitable that there is a process of generation from each to the
                        other?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Certainly,</q> said
                    he. 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="71c"/>
            <q type="spoken">Well then,</q> said Socrates,
                    <q type="spoken">is there anything that is the opposite of living, as being awake is the
                    opposite of sleeping?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Certainly,</q> said Cebes.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">What?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Being
                    dead,</q> said he.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Then these two are
                    generated from each other, and as they are two, so the processes between them
                    are two; is it not so?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Of
                        course.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Now,</q> said
                    Socrates, <q type="spoken">I will tell about one of the two pairs of which I just spoke to
                    you and its intermediate processes; and do you tell me about the other. I say
                    one term is sleeping and the other is being awake, and being awake is generated
                    from sleeping, and sleeping from being awake, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="71d"/>
            and the processes of generation are, in the latter case, falling asleep, and
                    in the former, waking up. Do you agree, or not?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Certainly.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Now do you,</q> said he, <q type="spoken">tell me in this way about life and
                    death. Do you not say that living is the opposite of being
                        dead?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">I do.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">And that they are generated one from the
                        other?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Yes.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Now what is it which is generated from the
                        living?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">The dead,</q> said
                        he.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">And what,</q> said Socrates,
                    <q type="spoken">from the dead?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">I can say only
                    one thing—the living.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">From the
                    dead, then, Cebes, the living, both things and persons, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="71e"/>
            are generated?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Evidently,</q> said he.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Then,</q> said Socrates, <q type="spoken">our souls exist in the other
                        world.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">So it
                        seems.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">And of the two processes
                    of generation between these two, the one is plain to be seen; for surely dying
                    is plain to be seen, is it not?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Certainly,</q> said he.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Well
                    then,</q> said Socrates, <q type="spoken">what shall we do next? Shall we deny the
                    opposite process, and shall nature be one-sided in this instance? Or must we
                    grant that there is some process of generation the opposite of
                        dying?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Certainly we must,</q>
    said he.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">What is this process?</q>
    <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Coming to life again.</q></said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>