<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:70</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:70</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="70"><p><said who="#Phaedo" rend="merge"><label>Phaedo.</label><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>When Socrates had finished, Cebes
                    answered and said: <q type="spoken">Socrates, I agree to <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="70"/>
            
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="70a"/>
            the other things you say, but in regard
                    to the soul men are very prone to disbelief. They fear that when the soul leaves
                    the body it no longer exists anywhere, and that on the day when the man dies it
                    is destroyed and perishes, and when it leaves the body and departs from it,
                    straightway it flies away and is no longer anywhere, scattering like a breath or
                    smoke. If it exists anywhere by itself as a unit, freed from these evils which
                    you have enumerated just now, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="70b"/>
            there would be
                    good reason for the blessed hope, Socrates, that what you say is true. But
                    perhaps no little argument and proof is required to show that when a man is dead
                    the soul still exists and has any power and intelligence.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">What you say, Cebes, is true,</q> said
                    Socrates. <q type="spoken">Now what shall we do? Do you wish to keep on conversing about
                    this to see whether it is probable or not?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">I do,</q> said Cebes. <q type="spoken">I should like to hear what you think
                    about it.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Well,</q> said
                    Socrates, <q type="spoken">I do not believe anyone who heard us now, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="70c"/>
            even if he were a comic poet, would say that I am chattering
                    and talking about things which do not concern me. So if you like, let us examine
                    the matter to the end.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>Let us consider it
                    by asking whether the souls of men who have died are in the nether world or not.
                    There is an ancient tradition, which we remember, that they go there from here
                    and come back here again and are born from the dead. Now if this is true, if the
                    living are born again from the dead, our souls would exist there, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="70d"/>
            would they not? For they could not be born again if
                    they did not exist, and this would be a sufficient proof that they exist, if it
                    should really be made evident that the living are born only from the dead. But
                    if this is not so then some other argument would be needed.</q>
    <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Certainly,</q> said Cebes.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Now,</q> said he, <q type="spoken">if you wish to find this out
                    easily, do not consider the question with regard to men only, but with regard to
                    all animals and plants, and, in short, to all things which may be said to have
                    birth. Let us see with regard to all these, whether it is true that they are all
                    born or generated 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="70e"/>
            only from their opposites,
                    in case they have opposites, as for instance, the noble is the opposite of the
                    disgraceful, the just of the unjust, and there are countless other similar
                    pairs. Let us consider the question whether it is inevitable that everything
                    which has an opposite be generated from its opposite and from it only. For
                    instance, when anything becomes greater it must inevitably have been smaller and
                    then have become greater.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Yes.</q></said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>