<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:65</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2:65</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="65"><p><said who="#Phaedo" rend="merge"><label>Phaedo.</label><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">To begin with, then, it is clear that in such
                    matters the philosopher, more than other men, separates <milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="65"/>
            
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="65a"/>
            the soul from communion with the
                    body?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">It is.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Now certainly most people think that a man who
                    takes no pleasure and has no part in such things doesn’t deserve to live, and
                    that one who cares nothing for the pleasures of the body is about as good as
                        dead.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">That is very
                        true.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Now, how about the
                    acquirement of pure knowledge? Is the body a hindrance or not, if it is made to
                    share in the search for wisdom? 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="65b"/>
            What I mean
                    is this: Have the sight and hearing of men any truth in them, or is it true, as
                    the poets are always telling us, that we neither hear nor see any thing
                    accurately? And yet if these two physical senses are not accurate or exact, the
                    rest are not likely to be, for they are inferior to these. Do you not think
                        so?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Certainly I do,</q> he
                        replied.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Then,</q> said he,
                    <q type="spoken">when does the soul attain to truth? For when it tries to consider
                    anything in company with the body, it is evidently deceived by it.</q>
                        
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="65c"/>
            <q type="spoken">True.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">In thought, then, if at all, something of the realities
                    becomes clear to it?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/>
                        <q type="spoken">Yes.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/> <q type="spoken">But it thinks best
                    when none of these things troubles it, neither hearing nor sight, nor pain nor
                    any pleasure, but it is, so far as possible, alone by itself, and takes leave of
                    the body, and avoiding, so far as it can, all association or contact with the
                    body, reaches out toward the reality.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">That is true.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">In this
                    matter also, then, 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="65d"/>
            the soul of the
                    philosopher greatly despises the body and avoids it and strives to be alone by
                        itself?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Evidently.</q>
    <milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Now how
                    about such things as this, Simmias? Do we think there is such a thing as
                    absolute justice, or not?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">We
                    certainly think there is.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">And
                    absolute beauty and goodness.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Of
                        course.</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Well, did you ever see
                    anything of that kind with your eyes?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Certainly not,</q> said he.<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Or
                    did you ever reach them with any of the bodily senses? I am speaking of all such
                    things, as size, health, strength, and in short the essence 
         
         <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="65e"/>
            or underlying quality of everything. Is their true nature
                    contemplated by means of the body? Is it not rather the case that he who
                    prepares himself most carefully to understand the true essence of each thing
                    that he examines would come nearest to the knowledge of it?</q><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Certainly.</q></said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>