<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg019.perseus-eng2:249-251</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg019.perseus-eng2:249-251</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg019.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="249" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> But as a symptom, not only of their confusion of mind, but of their contempt for the
          gods, they recognize that Persuasion is one of the gods, and they observe that the city
          makes sacrifices to her every year,<note anchored="true" resp="ed">Pausanias (<bibl n="Paus. 1.22.3">Paus. 1.22.3</bibl>) states that the worship of <foreign xml:lang="grc">*PEIQW/</foreign> (Persuasion) was established in Athens by Theseus,
            and speaks of a statue of this goddess as once standing near the Acropolis. A special
            seat of honor was assigned to her priestess in the Theatre. See <title>C.I.A.</title>
            iii. 351.</note> but when men aspire to share the power which the goddess possesses,
          they claim that such aspirants are being corrupted, as though their desire were for some
          evil thing. </p></div><div n="250" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>But what is most astonishing of all is that while they would grant that the mind is
          superior to the body, nevertheless, in spite of this opinion, they look with greater favor
          upon training in gymnastics than upon the study of philosophy.<note anchored="true" resp="ed">Cf. the opening paragraph of <bibl n="Isoc. 4.1">Isoc. 4.1</bibl> and
            note.</note> And yet how unreasonable it is to give higher praise to those who cultivate
          the less than to those who cultivate the greater thing, and that too when everyone knows
          it was not through excellence of body that Athens ever accomplished any noteworthy thing,
          but that through wisdom of men<note anchored="true" resp="ed">The rendering is here
            doubtful. Literally it is “through wisdom of a man.” Possibly Isocrates has in mind
            Pericles and the triumphs of Athens under his administration. Supporting the rendering
            “of a man” is <bibl n="Isoc. 7.11">Isoc. 7.11</bibl>.</note> she became the most
          prosperous and the greatest of Hellenic states. </p></div><div n="251" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> It would be possible to bring together many more contradictions than the above in the
          views of these people, but that is a task for those who are younger than I and who are
          free from anxiety about the present occasion. For example, one might put the following
          questions on this very subject: Suppose the case of men who, having inherited large
          fortunes from their ancestors, used their wealth, not to render themselves serviceable to
          the state, but to outrage their fellow-citizens and to dishonor their sons and their
          wives; would anyone venture to put the blame upon the authors of their wealth instead of
          demanding that the offenders themselves be punished? </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>