<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg019.perseus-eng2:156-158</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg019.perseus-eng2:156-158</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg019.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="156" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>he had no fixed domicile in any city and therefore paid out nothing for public weal nor
          was he subject to any tax; moreover, he did not marry and beget children, but was free
          from this, the most unremitting and expensive of burdens; and yet, although he had so
          great an advantage toward laying up more wealth than any other man, he left at his death
          only a thousand staters.<note anchored="true" resp="ed">A gold coin about equal in value
            to the guinea.</note>
        </p></div><div n="157" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>And surely on the subject of each other's incomes we must not credit people who make
          charges at haphazard nor think that the earnings of the sophists are equal to those of the
            actors,<note anchored="true" resp="ed">Popular actors, especially in comedy, received
            high pay. See Böckh, <title>Public Economy of Athens</title> p. 120.</note> but should
          judge men of the same profession in reference to each other and go on the principle that
          those of the same order of talent in each profession have incomes which are comparable.
        </p></div><div n="158" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>If, then, you will class me with the sophist who has made more money than any other, and
          will compare me with him, you will not seem to engage in utterly blind conjectures on such
          matters, nor shall I be found to have managed badly in providing either for the public
          welfare or for my own, although, as a matter of fact, I have lived on less than I have
          expended on my public duties. And surely it is deserving of praise when a man is more
          frugal in what he spends on his own household than in what he pays out for the common
          weal. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>