<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg014.perseus-eng2:13-16</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg014.perseus-eng2:13-16</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg014.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="13" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>and, second, that I hold this office, not illegally nor as a usurper, but with the just
          sanction of gods and men, and by virtue of my earliest ancestors, and of my father and of
          myself. For, once these claims have been established, who will not condemn himself to the
          severest punishment if he fails to heed my counsels and commands? </p></div><div n="14" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Speaking, then, of forms of government (for this was the subject I set out to lay before
          you), I imagine that we all believe that it is altogether monstrous<note anchored="true" resp="ed">A protest against the new “equality.” Cf. <bibl n="Isoc. 2.14">Isoc.
              2.14</bibl>. In <bibl n="Isoc. 7.21">Isoc. 7.21-22</bibl> Isocrates praises the old
            democracy of <placeName key="tgn,7001393">Athens</placeName> for recognizing ability and
            worth.</note> that the good and the bad should be thought worthy of the same privileges,
          and that it is of the very essence of justice that distinctions should be made between
          them, and that those who are unlike should not be treated alike but should fare and be
          rewarded in each case according to their deserts. </p></div><div n="15" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Now oligarchies and democracies seek equality for those who share in the administration
          of them; and the doctrine is in high favor in those governments that one man should not
          have the power to get more than another—a principle which works in the interest of the
          worthless! Monarchies, on the other hand, make the highest award to the best man, the next
          highest to the next best, and in the same proportion to the third and the fourth and so
          on. Even if this practice does not obtain everywhere, such at least is the intention of
          the polity. </p></div><div n="16" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>And, mark you, monarchies more than other governments keep an appraising eye upon the
          characters and actions of men, as everyone will admit. Who, then, that is of sound mind
          would not prefer to share in a form of government under which his own worth shall not pass
          unnoticed, rather than be lost in the hurly-burly of the mob and not be recognized for
          what he is? Furthermore, we should be right in pronouncing monarchy also a milder
          government, in proportion as it is easier to give heed to the will of a single person than
          to seek to please many and manifold minds. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>