<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg013.perseus-eng2:43-48</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg013.perseus-eng2:43-48</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg013.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="43" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>As a case in point, one might cite the poetry of Hesiod and Theognis and Phocylides;<note anchored="true" resp="ed">Theognis and Phocylides (middle of sixth century) were the
            leading gnomic poets. Theognis was used in the schools, and we have over a thousand of
            his verses. Phocylides survives in but a few fragments. Hesiod is classed with them
            because in his epic <title>The Works and Days</title> are scattered many maxims.</note>
          for these, they say, have proved the best counsellors for human conduct; but in spite of
          what they say, people prefer to occupy themselves with each other's follies rather than
          with the admonitions of these teachers. </p></div><div n="44" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>And, again, if one were to make a selection from the leading poets of their maxims, as we
          call them, into which they have put their best thought, men would show a similar attitude
          toward them also; for they would lend a readier ear to the cheapest comedy<note anchored="true" resp="ed">Isocrates had a poor opinion of comedy, himself having been
            subjected to its licence. Cf. <bibl n="Isoc. 8.14">Isoc. 8.14</bibl>.</note> than to the
          creations of such finished art. Yet why should I spend time in giving single instances?
        </p></div><div n="45" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>For if we are willing to survey human nature as a whole, we shall find that the majority
          of men do not take pleasure in the food<note anchored="true" resp="ed">Cf. <bibl n="Isoc. 1.45">Isoc. 1.45</bibl>.</note> that is the most wholesome, nor in the
          pursuits that are the most honorable, nor in the actions that are the noblest, nor in the
          creatures that are the most useful, but that they have tastes which are in every way
          contrary to their best interests, while they view those who have some regard for their
          duty as men of austere and laborious lives. </p></div><div n="46" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>How, then, can one advise or teach or say anything of profit and yet please such people?
          For, besides what I have said of them, they look upon men of wisdom with suspicion, while
          they regard men of no understanding as open and sincere; and they so shun the verities of
          life that they do not even know their own interests: nay, it irks them to take account of
          their own business and it delights them to discuss the business of others; </p></div><div n="47" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>and they would rather be ill in body than exert the soul and give thought to anything in
          the line of duty. Observe them when they are in each other's company, and you will find
          them giving and taking abuse; observe them when they are by themselves, and you will find
          them occupied, not with plans, but with idle dreams. I am, however, speaking now not of
          all, but of those only who are open to the charges I have made. </p></div><div n="48" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> This much, however, is clear, that those who aim to write anything in verse or prose
          which will make a popular appeal should seek out, not the most profitable discourses, but
          those which most abound in fictions; for the ear delights in these just as the eye
          delights in games and contests. Wherefore we may well admire the poet Homer and the first
          inventors of tragedy, seeing that they, with true insight into human nature, have embodied
          both kinds of pleasure in their poetry; </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>