<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg005.perseus-eng2:31-32</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg005.perseus-eng2:31-32</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="en"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg005.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="31" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>But here is the strongest proof of all that in the agreement Pasion was not absolved from
          his debt, but on the contrary had agreed to repay the gold: when Menexenus lodged his suit
          against him, which was before the memorandum had been tampered with, Pasion sent
            Agyrrhius<note anchored="true" resp="ed">An influential man in public affairs; cf. <bibl n="Andoc. 1.133">Andoc. 1.133</bibl>.</note>, a friend of both of us, to beg that I
          either appease Menexenus or annul the agreement I had made with himself. </p></div><div n="32" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>And yet, men of the jury, do you think that he would desire the annulment of this
          agreement, which he could use to convict us of falsehood? At any rate, this was not what
          he was saying after they had altered the memorandum; on the contrary, in all details he
          appealed to the agreement and ordered the memorandum to be opened. In proof that Pasion at
          first was eager for the suppression of the agreement I will produce Agyrrhius himself as
          witness. Please take the stand.<quote type="Testimony"><p>Testimony</p></quote>
        </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>