<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg002.perseus-eng2:53-60</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg002.perseus-eng2:53-60</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg002.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="53" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Cratinus, learning of their plots, remained quiet for a long time in order that they
          might not change their plans and concoct another story, but instead might be caught in the
          very act of committing a crime. When the brother-in-law of Callimachus had made accusation
          and Callimachus had testified on oath that the woman was actually dead, </p></div><div n="54" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Cratinus and his friends went to the house where she had been hidden, seized her by force
          and, bringing her into court, presented her alive to all present. The result was that, in
          a tribunal of seven hundred judges, after fourteen witnesses had given the same testimony
          as that of Callimachus, he failed to receive a single vote. Please call witnesses to these
          facts. <quote type="Witnesses"/>
        </p></div><div n="55" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Who, therefore, would be able to condemn his acts as they deserve? Or who would be able
          to find a more flagrant example of wrongdoing, of malicious prosecution, and of villainy?
          Some misdeeds, it is true, do not reveal in its entirety the character of the evil-doers,
          but from acts such as his it is easy to discern the whole life of the culprits. </p></div><div n="56" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>For any man who testifies that the living are dead, from what villainy do you think that
          he would abstain? What outrageous deed would a man not have the effrontery to commit in
          his own interest who is so knavish a villain in the interest of others ? How is it right
          to trust this man when he speaks in his own behalf, who is proved guilty of perjury in his
          testimony on behalf of another? Who was ever more convincingly proved to be a giver of
          false testimony? You judge all other defendants by what is said of them, but this man's
          testimony the jurors themselves saw was false. </p></div><div n="57" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>And after the commission of such crimes he will dare to say that it is we who are lying.
          Why that would be as if Phrynondas<note anchored="true" resp="ed">A notorious swindler;
            cf. <bibl n="Aristoph. Thes. 861">Aristoph. Thes. 861</bibl> and <bibl n="Aeschin. 3.137">Aeschin. 3.137</bibl>.</note> should reproach a man with villainy,
          or as if Philurgos, who stole the Gorgon's head,<note anchored="true" resp="ed">The golden
            relief of the head, the work of Pheidias, was affixed to the shield of the gold and
            ivory statue of Athena in the Parthenon.</note> had called everybody else
          temple-robbers! Who is more likely to present witnesses of events which have not occurred
          than my antagonist here, who himself has the hardihood to testify falsely for others? </p></div><div n="58" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> But against Callimachus it will be possible to bring accusations time and again, for he
          has contrived his life as a citizen that way; but as for myself, I shall say nothing of
          all my other contributions to the state, but I will merely remind you of that one, a
          service for which, if you would do me justice, you would not only be grateful, but you
          would take it even as evidence bearing upon the case as a whole. </p></div><div n="59" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Now when the city had lost its ships in the Hellespont<note anchored="true" resp="ed">At
            Aegospotami, <date when="-0405">405 B.C.</date></note> and was shorn of its power, I so
          far surpassed the majority of the trierarchs that I was one of the very few who saved
          their ships: and of these few I alone brought back my ship to the Piraeus and did not
          resign my duties as trierarch; </p></div><div n="60" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>but when the other trierarchs were glad to be relieved of their duties and were
          discouraged over the situation, and not only regretted the loss of what they had already
          spent, but were trying to conceal the remainder and, judging that the commonwealth was
          completely ruined, were looking out for their private interests, my decision was not the
          same as theirs; but after persuading my brother to be joint-trierarch with me, we paid the
          crew out of our own means and proceeded to harass the enemy. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>