<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg126.perseus-eng3:3</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg126.perseus-eng3:3</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg126.perseus-eng3" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div subtype="section" type="textpart" n="3"><p rend="indent">Apollonides broke in and inquired what the opinion of Clearchus was. <q>You are the last person,</q> I said, <q>who has any right not to know a theory of which geometry is, as it were, the very hearth and <pb xml:id="v12.p.41"/> home. The man, you see, asserts that what is called the face consists of mirrored likenesses, that is images of the great ocean reflected in the moon,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Similar theories are referred to by Aëtius, ii. 30. 1 (<title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Dox. Graeci</title>, p. 361 B 10-13) = Stobaeus, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Eclogae</title>, i. 26. 4; Lucian, <title rend="italic">Icaromenippus</title>, § 20; Simplicius, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat"> Caelo</title>, p. 457. 15-16. Such a theory is recorded and refuted by Ibn Al-Haitham, the Arabic astronomer of the tenth and eleventh centuries (cf, Schoy’s translation, pp. 1-2 and 5-6). Emperor Rudolph II believed the spots on the moon to be the reflection of Italy and the large Italian islands (<foreign xml:lang="lat">cf.</foreign> Kepler, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Opera Omnia</title>, ii, p. 491 cited by Pixis, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="deu">Kepler als Geography</title> p. 102); and A. von Humboldt (<title rend="italic">Kosmos</title>, iii, p. 544 [Stuttgart, 1850]) tells of a Persian from Ispahan who assured him that what we see in the moon is the map of our earth (<foreign xml:lang="lat">cf.</foreign> Ebner, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="deu">Geographische Hinweise und Anklänge in Plutarchs Schrift, de facie</title>, p. 13, n. 3).</note> for the visual ray when reflected naturally reaches from many points objects which are not directly visible and the full moon is itself in uniformity and lustre<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">i.e. in the evenness and polish of its surface.</note> the finest and clearest of all mirrors. Just as you think, then, that the reflection of the visual ray to the sun accounts for the appearance of the (rainbow) in a cloud where the moisture has become somewhat smooth and (condensed),<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">For the rainbow as a reflection of the sun in the cloud <foreign xml:lang="lat">cf.</foreign> <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat"> Iside</title>, 358 F, Amatorius, 765 E - F (where there is a strong verbal similarity to the present passage), <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat"> Placitis</title>, 894 C - F (= Aëtius, iii. 5, 3-10 and 11 [<title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Dox. Graeci</title>, pp. 372-373]). According to Aëtius, iii. 5. 11 ( = <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat"> Placitis</title>, 894 F) the theory was held by Anaxagoras (<foreign xml:lang="lat">cf.</foreign> frag. B 19 = ii, p. 41. 8-11 [Diels-Kranz]). It is developed by Aristotle in <title rend="italic">Meteorology</title>, iii. 4, 373 A 32 375 B 15 (<foreign xml:lang="lat">cf.</foreign> Areius Didymus’s <title rend="italic">Epitome</title>, frag. 14 = <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Dox. Graeci</title>, p. 455.14 ff., and Seneca, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Nat. Quaest.</title> i. 3). Diogenes Laertius, vii. 152 cites Posidonius for the definition <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἶριν δ’ εἶναι <gap reason="lost" rend=" . . . "/>ὡς Ποσειδώνιός φησιν <gap reason="lost" rend=" . . . "/>ἔμφασιν ἡλίου τμήματος ἣ ἐν νέφει δεδροσιμένῳ, κοίλῳ καὶ συνεχεῖ πρὸς φαντασίαν, ὡς ἐν κατόpτρῳ φανταζομένην κατὰ κύκλου περιφέρειαν</foreign> (<foreign xml:lang="lat">cf.</foreign> Seneca, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Nat. Quaest.</title> i. 5. 13); and Adler (<title rend="italic" xml:lang="deu">Diss. Phil. Vind.</title> x, pp. 128-129) contends that Posidonius was Plutarch’s source for the formulation of the theory. Plutarch’s <foreign xml:lang="grc">oἴεσθ’ ὑμεῖς</foreign>, however, addressed to Apollonides must be intended to ascribe the theory generally to <q>you mathematicians</q>; and this is confirmed by the passage of <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat"> Iside</title> cited above, which reads: <foreign xml:lang="grc">καἰ καθάπερ οἱ μαθηματικοὶ τὴν ἶριν <gap reason="lost" rend=" . . . "/>λέγουσι <gap reason="lost" rend=" . . . . "/></foreign> On the difference between the theories of Aristotle and Posidonius <foreign xml:lang="lat">cf.</foreign> O. Gilbert, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="deu">Die meteorologischen Theorien des griechischen Altertums</title>, pp. 614-616.</note> so Clearchus thought that the outer ocean is seen in the moon, not in the place where it is but in the place whence the visual ray has been deflected to the ocean and the reflection of the ocean to us. <pb xml:id="v12.p.43"/> So Agesianax again has somewhere said: <quote rend="blockquote"><l>Or swell of ocean surging opposite </l><l>Be mirrored in a looking-glass of flame.</l></quote> </q> <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Powell (<title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Collectanea Alexandrina</title>, p. 9) prints these lines as fragment 2 of the <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Phaenomena</title> of Hegesianax; see note a on p. 39 <foreign xml:lang="lat">supra</foreign>.</note> </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>