<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg097.perseus-eng4:19</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg097.perseus-eng4:19</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg097.perseus-eng4"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="19"><p rend="indent">Again, this rule is to be observed, that, whenever
				any difference happens betwixt brothers, during the time
				of strangeness especially they hold a correspondence with
				one another’s friends, but by all means avoid their enemies.
				The Cretans are herein very observable; who, being accustomed to frequent skirmishes and fights, nevertheless, as
				soon as they were attacked by a foreign enemy, were
				reconciled and went together. And that was it which
				they commonly called Syncretism. For there are some
				
				<pb xml:id="v.3.p.63"/>
				
				who, like waters running among loose and chinky grounds,
				overthrow all familiarity and friendship; enemies to both
				parties, but especially bent upon the ruining of him whose
				weakness exposes him most to danger. For every sincere substantial friend joins in affection with one that
				approves himself such to him. And you shall observe, on
				the other hand, that the most inveterate and pernicious
				enemy contributes the poison of his ill-nature to heighten
				the passion of an angry brother. Therefore as the cat, in
				Aesop, out of pretended kindness asked the sick hen how
				she did, and she answered, The better if you were further
				off; after the same manner one would answer an incendiary that throws in words to breed discord, and to that
				end pries into things that are not to be spoken of, saying:
				I have no controversy with my brother nor he with me, if
				neither of us shall hearken to such sycophants as you are.
				I cannot understand why—seeing it is commonly held
				convenient for those who have tender eyes and a weak
				sight to shun those objects that are apt to make a strong
				reflection—the rule should not hold good in morals, and
				why those whom we would imagine sick of the trouble of
				fraternal quarrels and contentions should rather seem to
				take pleasure in them, and even seek the company of those
				who will only excite them the more and make all worse.
				How much more prudential a course would they take in
				avoiding the enemies of their offended brethren, and rather
				conversing with their relations and friends or even with
				their wives, and discovering their grievances to them
				frankly and with plainness of speech! But some are of
				that scrupulous opinion, that brothers walking together
				must not suffer a stone to lie in the way betwixt them, and
				are very much concerned if a dog happen to run betwixt
				them; and many such things, being looked upon as ominous, discompose and terrify them. Whereas none of
				them all any way tends to the breaking of friendship or
				
				<pb xml:id="v.3.p.64"/>
				
				the causing of dissension; but they are not in the least
				aware that men of snarling dispositions, base detractors,
				and instigators of mischief, whom they improvidently admit into their society, are the things that do them the
				greatest hurt.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>