<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg097.perseus-eng4:12</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg097.perseus-eng4:12</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg097.perseus-eng4"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="12"><p rend="indent">Solon discoursing about the commonwealth approved of equality, as being that which would occasion no
				tumult or faction. But this opinion appeared too popular;
				for by this arithmetical method he would have set up
				democracy in the room of a far happier government, consisting with a more suitable (viz., a geometrical) proportion.
				But he that advises brethren in the dividing of an estate
				should give them Plato’s counsel to the citizens, that they
				would lay aside self-interest, or, if they cannot be persuaded to that, to be satisfied with an equal division. And
				this is the way to lay a good and lasting foundation of love
				and peace betwixt them. Besides that, he may have the
				advantage of naming eminent instances. Such was that of
				Pittacus, who, being asked of the Lydian king whether he
				had any estate, replied that he had twice as much as he
				wanted, his brother being dead. But since that not only
				in the affluence or want of riches he that has a less share
				is liable to hostility with him that has more, but generally,
				as Plato says, in all inequality there is inquietude and disturbance, and in the contrary a during confidence; so a
				disparity among brethren tends dangerously to discord.
				But for them to be equal in all respects, I grant, is impossible.
				
				<pb xml:id="v.3.p.51"/>
				
				 For what through the difference that nature made
				immediately betwixt them at the first, and what through
				the following contingencies of their lives, it comes to pass
				that they contract an envy and hatred against one another,
				and such abominable humors as render them the plagues
				not only of their private families but even of commonwealths. And this indeed is a disease which it were well
				to prevent, or to cure when it is engendered. I would
				persuade that brother therefore that excels his fellows in
				any accomplishments, in those very things to communicate
				and impart to them the utmost he can, that they may shine
				in his honor, and flourish with his interest. For instance,
				if he be a good orator, to endeavor to make that faculty
				theirs, accounting it never the less for being imparted. And
				care ought to be taken that all this kindness be not followed with a fastidious pride, but rather with such a
				becoming condescension and familiarity as may secure
				his worth from envy, and by his own equanimity and
				sweet disposition, as far as is possible, make up the
				inequality of their fortunes. Lucullus refused the honor
				of magistracy on purpose to give way to his younger
				brother, contentedly waiting for the expiration of his year.
				Pollux chose rather to be half a deity with his brother
				than a deity by himself, and therefore to debase himself
				into a share of mortality, that he might raise his brother as
				much above it. You then are a happy man, one would
				think, that can oblige your brother at a cheaper rate, illustrate him with the honor of your virtues, and make him
				great like yourself, without any damage or derogation.
				Thus Plato made his brothers famous by mentioning them
				in the choicest of his books,—Glauco and Adimantus in
				that concerning the Commonwealth, and Antipho his
				youngest brother in his Parmenides.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>