<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg084a.perseus-eng3:86-99</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg084a.perseus-eng3:86-99</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:id="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg084a.perseus-eng3" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="86"><p rend="indent">Why do men not marry during the month of May?<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Ovid, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Fasti</title>, v. 489.</note> </p><p rend="indent">Is it because this month comes between April and June, of which they regard April as sacred to Venus and June as sacred to Juno, both of them divinities of marriage: and so they put the wedding a little earlier or wait until later? <pb xml:id="v.4.p.133"/> </p><p rend="indent">Or is it because in this month they hold their most important ceremony of purification, in which they now throw images from the bridge into the river,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> 272 b, <foreign xml:lang="lat">supra</foreign>.</note> but in days of old they used to throw human beings? Wherefore it is the custom that the Flaminica, reputed to be consecrate to Juno, shall wear a stern face, and refrain from bathing and wearing ornaments at this time. </p><p rend="indent">Or is it because many of the Latins make offerings to the departed in this month? And it is for this reason, perhaps, that they worship Mercury in this month and that the month derives its name from Maia.<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">The mother of Mercury.</note> </p><p rend="indent">Or is May, as some relate, named after the older (<foreign xml:lang="lat">maior</foreign>) and June after the younger generation (<foreign xml:lang="lat">iunior</foreign>)? For youth is better fitted for marriage, as Euripides<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">From the <title rend="italic">Aeolus</title> of Euripides; Nauck, <title xml:lang="lat" rend="italic">Trag. Graec. Frag.</title> p. 369, Euripides, no. 23; <foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Moralia</title>, 786 a, 1094 f.</note> also says: <quote rend="blockquote"><l>Old age bids Love to take her leave for aye </l><l>And Aphrodite wearies of the old.</l></quote> They do not, therefore, marry in May, but wait for June which comes next after May. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="87"><p rend="indent">Why do they part the hair of brides with the point of a spear?<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><title rend="italic">Life of Romulus</title>, chap. xv. (26 e).</note> </p><p rend="indent">Does this symbolize the marriage of the first Roman wives<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">The Sabine women.</note> by violence with attendant war, or do the wives thus learn, now that they are mated to brave and warlike men, to welcome an unaffected, unfeminine, and simple mode of beautification? Even as Lycurgus,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Moralia</title>, 189 e, 227 c, 997 c; and the <title rend="italic">Life of Lycurgus</title>, chap. xiii. (47 c); <foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> also <title rend="italic">Comment. on Hesiod</title>, 42 (Bernardakis, vol. vii. p. 72).</note> by giving orders to make the <pb xml:id="v.4.p.135"/> doors and roofs of houses with the saw and the axe only, and to use absolutely no other tool, banished all over-refinement and extravagance. </p><p rend="indent">Or does this procedure hint at the manner of their separation, that with steel alone can their marriage be dissolved? </p><p rend="indent">Or is it that most of the marriage customs were connected with Juno?<note resp="editor" place="unspeciifed" anchored="true">See Roscher, <title xml:lang="deu" rend="italic">Lexikon der gr.und.röm. Mythologie</title>, ii. coll. 588-592.</note> Now the spear is commonly held to be sacred to Juno, and most of her statues represent her leaning on a spear, and the goddess herself is surnamed <foreign xml:lang="lat">Quirite</foreign>; for the men of old used to call the spear <foreign xml:lang="lat">curis</foreign>; wherefore they further relate that Enyalius is called Quirinus by the Romans.<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><title rend="italic">Life of Romulus</title>, chap. xxix. (36 b); Dionysius of Halicarnassus, <title rend="italic">Roman Antiquities</title>, ii. 48; Ovid, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Fasti</title>, ii. 475 ff.</note> </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="88"><p rend="indent">Why do they call the money expended upon public spectacles <foreign xml:lang="lat">Lucar</foreign>? </p><p rend="indent">Is it because round about the city there are, consecrated to gods, many groves which they call <foreign xml:lang="lat">luci</foreign>, and they used to spend the revenue from these on the public spectacles? </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="89"><p rend="indent">Why do they call the Quirinalia the Feast of Fools?<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Ovid, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Fasti</title>, ii. 513 ff.</note> </p><p rend="indent">Is it because, as Juba<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Müller, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Frag. Hist. Graec.</title> iii. p. 470.</note> states, they apportioned that day to men who did not know their own kith and kin?<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Curiae</foreign></note> Or was it granted to those who, because of some business, or absence from Rome, or ignorance, had not sacrificed with the rest of their tribe on the Fornacalia, that, on this day, they might take their due enjoyment of that festival? <pb xml:id="v.4.p.137"/> </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="90"><p rend="indent">Why is it that, when the sacrifice to Hercules takes place, they mention by name no other god, and why is a dog never seen within his enclosure,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Pliny, <title rend="italic">Natural History</title>, x. 29 (79).</note> as Varro has recorded? </p><p rend="indent">Do they make mention of no other god because they regard Hercules as a demigod? But, as some<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Dionysius of Halicarnassus, <title rend="italic">Roman Antiquities</title>, i. 40. Livy, i. 7. 12.</note> relate, even while he was still on earth, Evander erected an altar to him and brought him sacrifice. And of all animals he contended most with a dog, for it is a fact that this beast always gave him much trouble, Cerberus, for instance. And, to crown all, when Oeonus, Licymnius’s son, had been murdered by the sons of Hippocoön<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Apollodorus, ii. 7. 3 with Frazer’s note (L.C.L. vol. i. p. 251).</note> because of a dog, Hercules was compelled to engage in battle with them, and lost many of his friends and his brother Iphicles. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="91"><p rend="indent">Why was it not permitted the patricians to dwell about the Capitoline? </p><p rend="indent">Was it because Marcus Manlius,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><title rend="italic">Life of Camillus</title>, chap. xxxvi. (148 d); Livy, vi. 20. 13-14.</note> while he was dwelling there, tried to make himself king? They say that because of him the house of Manlius was bound by an oath that none of them should ever bear the name of Marcus. </p><p rend="indent">Or does this fear date from early times? At any rate, although Publicola<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><title rend="italic"> Life of Publicola</title>, chap. x. (102 c-d).</note> was a most democratic man, the nobles did not cease traducing him nor the commoners fearing him, until he himself razed his house, the situation of which was thought to be a threat to the Forum. <pb xml:id="v.4.p.139"/> </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="92"><p rend="indent">Why do they give a chaplet of oak leaves to the man who has saved the life of a citizen in time of war?<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><title rend="italic">Life of Coriolanus</title>, chap. iii. (214 e-f); Pliny, <title rend="italic">Natural History</title>, xvi. 4 (11-14); Polybius, vi. 39. 6; Aulus Gellius, v. 6.</note> </p><p rend="indent">Is it because it is easy to find an abundance of oak leaves everywhere on a campaign? </p><p rend="indent">Or is it because the chaplet is sacred to Jupiter and Juno, whom they regard as guardians of the city? </p><p rend="indent">Or is the custom an ancient inheritance from the Arcadians, who have a certain kinship with the oak? For they are thought to have been the first men sprung from the earth, even as the oak was the first plant. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="93"><p rend="indent">Why do they make most use of vultures in augury? </p><p rend="indent">Is it because twelve vultures appeared to Romulus at the time of the founding of Rome? Or is it because this is the least frequent and familiar of birds? For it is not easy to find a vulture’s nest, but these birds suddenly swoop down from afar; wherefore the sight of them is portentous. </p><p rend="indent">Or did they learn this also from Hercules? If Herodorus<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Müller, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Frag. Hist. Graec.</title> ii. p. 31; <foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><title rend="italic">Life of Romulus</title>, ix. (23 a-b); Pliny, <title rend="italic">Natural History</title>, x. 6 (19); Aelian, <title xml:lang="lat" rend="italic">De Natura Animalium</title>, ii. 46.</note> tells the truth, Hercules delighted in the appearance of vultures beyond that of all other birds at the beginning of any undertaking, since he believed that the vulture was the most righteous of all flesh-eating creatures: for, in the first place, it touches no living thing, nor does it kill any animate creature, as do eagles and hawks and the birds that fly by night: but it lives upon that which has been killed in some other way. Then again, even of these <pb xml:id="v.4.p.141"/> it leaves its own kind untouched: for no one has ever seen a vulture feeding on a bird, as eagles and hawks do, pursuing and striking their own kind particularly. And yet, as Aeschylus<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><title rend="italic">Suppliants</title>, 226.</note> says, <quote rend="blockquote">How can a bird that feeds on birds be pure?</quote> And we may say that it is the most harmless of birds to men, since it neither destroys any fruit or plant nor injures any domesticated animal. But if, as the Egyptians fable, the whole species is female, and they conceive by receiving the breath of the East Wind, even as the trees do by receiving the West Wind, then it is credible that the signs from them are altogether unwavering and certain. But in the case of the other birds, their excitements in the mating season, as well as their abductions, retreats, and pursuits, have much that is disturbing and unsteady. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="94"><p rend="indent">Why is the shrine of Aesculapius<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Pliny, <title rend="italic">Natural History</title>, xxix. 1 (16); 4 (72); Livy, x. 47, <title rend="italic">Epitome</title>, xi.</note> outside the city? </p><p rend="indent">Is it because they considered it more healthful to spend their time outside the city than within its walls? In fact the Greeks, as might be expected, have their shrines of Asclepius situated in places which are both clean and high. </p><p rend="indent">Or is it because they believe that the god carne at their summons from Epidaurus, and the Epidauria. have their shrine of Asclepius not in the city, but at some distance? </p><p rend="indent">Or is it because the serpent carne out from the trireme into the island,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">The <foreign xml:lang="lat">Insula Tiberina</foreign>.</note> and there disappeared, and thus they thought that the god himself was indicating to them the site for building? <pb xml:id="v.4.p.143"/> </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="95"><p rend="indent">Why is it the customary rule that those who are practising holy living must abstain from legumes?<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Pliny, <title rend="italic">Natural History</title>, xviii. 12 (118-119); Aulus Gellius, x. 15. 12.</note> </p><p rend="indent">Did they, like the followers of Pythagoras,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign>, for example, Juvenal, xv. 9 <q><foreign xml:lang="lat">porrum et caepe nefas violare et frangere morsu</foreign></q>; Horace, <title rend="italic">Satires</title>, ii. 6. 63; <title xml:lang="lat" rend="italic">Epistles</title>, i. 12. 21.</note> religiously abstain from beans for the reasons which are commonly offered,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">The numerous reasons suggested may be found in Pauly-Wissowa, <title rend="italic">Real-Encyclopadie</title>, vol. iii. coll. 619-620.</note> and from vetch and chickpea, because their names (<foreign xml:lang="lat">lathyros</foreign> and <foreign xml:lang="lat">erebinthos</foreign>) suggest Lethê and Erebus? </p><p rend="indent">Or is it because they make particular use of legumes for funeral feasts and invocations of the dead? </p><p rend="indent">Or is it rather because one must keep the body clean and light for purposes of holy living and lustration? Now legumes are a flatulent food and produce surplus matter that requires much purgation. </p><p rend="indent">Or is it because the windy and flatulent quality of the food stimulates desire? </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="96"><p rend="indent">Why do they inflict no other punishment on those of the Holy Maidens<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Plutarch elsewhere uses a similar expression (<foreign xml:lang="grc">παρθένος ἱέρεια</foreign>) for the vestal virgins, <foreign xml:lang="lat">e.g.</foreign> in his <title rend="italic">Life of Publicola</title>, chap. viii. (101 b) or <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Moralia</title>, 89 e.</note> who have been seduced, but bury them alive?<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><title rend="italic">Life of Numa</title>, chap. x. (67 a-c); Ovid, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Fasti</title>, vi. 457-460; Dionysius of Halicarnassus, <title rend="italic">Roman Antiquities</title>, ii. 67. 4, viii. 89. 5; Pliny, <title rend="italic">Epistles</title>, iv. 11. 6.</note> </p><p rend="indent">Is it because they cremate their dead, and to use fire in the burial of a woman who had not guarded the holy fire in purity was not right? </p><p rend="indent">Or did they believe it to be against divine ordinance to annihilate a body that had been consecrated by the greatest of lustra! ceremonies, or to lay hands upon a holy woman? Accordingly they devised that she should die of herself; they conducted her underground into a chamber built there, in which had been placed a lighted lamp, a loaf of bread, <pb xml:id="v.4.p.145"/> and some milk and water. Thereafter they covered over the top of the chamber with earth. And yet not even by this manner of avoiding the guilt have they escaped their superstitious fear, but even to this day the priests proceed to this place and make offerings to the dead. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="97"><p rend="indent">Why is it that after the chariot-race on the Ides of December<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Presumably an error of Plutarch’s: he means the tenth month, October: <foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Festus, <foreign xml:lang="lat">s.v. October equus</foreign>, p. 178. 5.</note> the right-hand trace-horse of the winning team is sacrificed to Mars, and then someone cuts off its tail, and carries it to the place called Regia and sprinkles its blood on the altar, while some come down from the street called the Via Sacra, and some from the Subura, and fight for its head? </p><p rend="indent">Is it, as some<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Such as the historian Timaeus: <foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Polybius xii. 4b.</note> say, that they believe Troy to have been taken by means of a horse: and therefore they punish it, since, forsooth, they are <quote rend="blockquote">Noble scions of Trojans commingled with children of Latins.<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">A verse made in imitation of Homer, <title rend="italic">Il.</title> xviii. 337 (or xxiii. 23), blended with a part of x. 424.</note> </quote> </p><p rend="indent">Or is it because the horse is a spirited, warlike, and martial beast, and they sacrifice to the gods creatures that are particularly pleasing and appropriate for them: and the winner is sacrificed because Mars is the specific divinity of victory and prowess? </p><p rend="indent">Or is it rather because the work of the god demands standing firm, and men that hold their ground defeat those that do not hold it, but flee? And is swiftness punished as being the coward’s resource, and do they learn symbolically that there is no safety for those who flee? <pb xml:id="v.4.p.147"/> </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="98"><p rend="indent">Why do the censors, when they take office, do nothing else before they contract for the food of the sacred geese<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Pliny, <title rend="italic">Natural History</title>, x. 22 (51).</note> and the polishing of the statue?<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">The statue of Jupiter Capitolinus: Pliny, <title rend="italic">Natural History</title>, xxxiii. 7 (112).</note> </p><p rend="indent">Is it that they begin with the most trivial things, matters that require little expense or trouble? </p><p rend="indent">Or is this a commemoration of an old debt of gratitude owed to these creatures for their services in the Gallic wars?<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> 325 c-d, <foreign xml:lang="lat">infra</foreign>; <title rend="italic">Life of Camillus</title>, xxvii. (142 d ff.): Livy, v. 47; Dionysius of Halicarnassus, <title rend="italic">Roman Antiquities</title>, xiii. 7-8; Diodorus, xiv. 116.</note> For when in the night the barbarians were already climbing over the rampart of the Capitol, the gee se perceived the invaders, although the dogs were asleep, and waked the guards by their clamour. </p><p rend="indent">Or is it because the censors are guardians of the most important matters, and, since it is their duty to oversee and to busy themselves with sacred and State affairs and with the lives, morals, and conduct of the people, they immediately take into account the most vigilant of creatures, and at the same time by their care of the geese they urge the citizens not to be careless or indifferent about sacred matters? </p><p rend="indent">But the polishing<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">The high polish of the Roman statues is very noticeable in contrast with the duller surface of Greek statues. This is one of the factors in the controversy over the genuineness of the Hermes of Praxiteles at Olympia.</note> of the statue is absolutely necessary: for the red pigment, with which they used to tint ancient statues, rapidly loses its freshness. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="99"><p rend="indent">Why is it that, if any one of the other priests is condemned and exiled, they depose him and elect another, but the augur, as long as he lives, even if they find him guilty of the worst offences, they do not <pb xml:id="v.4.p.149"/> deprive of his priesthood?<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Pliny, <title rend="italic">Letters</title>, iv. 8. 1.</note> They call <q>augurs</q> the men who are in charge of the omens. </p><p rend="indent">Is it, as some say, because they wish no one who is not a priest to know the secrets of the holy rites? </p><p rend="indent">Or, because the augur is bound by oaths to reveal the sacred matters to no one, are they unwilling to release him from his oath as would be the case if he had been reduced to private status? </p><p rend="indent">Or is <q>augur</q> a name denoting, not a rank or office, but knowledge and skill? Then to prevent a soothsayer from being a soothsayer would be like voting that a musician shall not be a musician, nor a physician a physician: for they cannot deprive him of his ability, even if they take away his title. They naturally appoint no successor since they keep the original number of augurs. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>