<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg084a.perseus-eng3:52-53</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg084a.perseus-eng3:52-53</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:id="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg084a.perseus-eng3" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="52"><p rend="indent">Why do they sacrifice a bitch to the goddess called Geneta Mana<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Pliny, <title rend="italic">Natural History</title>, xxix. 4 (58).</note> and pray that none of the household shall become <q>good</q>? </p><p rend="indent">Is it because Geneta is a spirit concerned with the generation and birth of beings that perish? Her name means some such thing as <q>flux and birth</q> or <q>flowing birth.</q> <note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">An attempt to derive the name from <foreign xml:lang="lat">genitus (-a, -um)</foreign> and <foreign xml:lang="lat">manare</foreign>.</note> Accordingly, just as the Greeks sacrifice a bitch to Hecatê,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> 280 c, <foreign xml:lang="lat">infra</foreign>.</note> even so do the Romans offer the same sacrifice to Geneta on behalf of the members of their household. But Socrates<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Müller, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Frag. Hist. Graec.</title> iv. p. 498.</note> says that the Argives sacrifice a bitch to Eilioneia by reason of the ease with which the bitch brings forth its young. But does the import of the prayer, that none of them shall become <q>good,</q> refer not to the human members of a household, but to the dogs? For dogs should be savage and terrifying. <pb xml:id="v.4.p.87"/> </p><p rend="indent">Or, because of the fact that the dead are gracefully called <q>the good,</q> are they in veiled language asking in their prayer that none of their household may die? One should not be surprised at this: Aristotle,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Frag. 592 (ed. V. Rose); <foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Moralia</title>, 292 b, <foreign xml:lang="lat">infra</foreign>.</note> in fact, says that there is written in the treaty of the Arcadians with the Spartans: <q>No one shall be made good<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><foreign xml:lang="grc">χρηστὲ χαῖρ</foreign> on Greek tombstones.</note> for rendering aid to the Spartan party in Tegea</q>: that is, no one shall be put to death. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="53"><p rend="indent">Why do they even now, at the celebration of the Capitoline games, proclaim <q>Sardians for sale!</q>,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">So apparently Plutarch; but the Latin <foreign xml:lang="lat">Sardi venales</foreign> can mean nothing but <q>Sardinians for sale.</q> Plutarch, or his authority, has confused <foreign xml:lang="lat">Sardi</foreign> with <foreign xml:lang="lat">Sardiani</foreign> (Sardians).</note> and why is an old man led forth in derision, wearing around his neck a child’s amulet which they call a <foreign xml:lang="lat">bulla</foreign> <note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><title rend="italic">Life of Romulus</title>, xxv. (33 e).</note>? </p><p rend="indent">Is it because the Etruscans called Veians fought against Romulus for a long time, and he took this city last of all<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">This is quite contrary to the traditional account (<foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> for example, Livy, vi. 21-23), according to which Veii was not captured until 396 b.c.</note> and sold at auction many captives together with their king, taunting him for his stupidity and folly? But since the Etruscans were originally Lydians, and Sardis was the capital city of the Lydians, they offered the Veians for sale under this name: and even to this day they preserve the custom in sport. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>