<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg047.perseus-eng2:7.1-8.4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg047.perseus-eng2:7.1-8.4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg047.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="7"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="1"><p>And since Philip saw that his son’s nature was unyielding and that he
                            resisted compulsion, but was easily led by reasoning into the path of
                            duty, he himself tried to persuade rather than to command him; and
                            because he would not wholly entrust the direction and training of the
                            boy to the ordinary teachers of poetry and the formal studies, feeling
                            that it was a matter of too great importance, and, in the words of
                            Sophocles,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Nauck,
                                    <title>Trag. Graec. Frag.2</title> p. 315.</note>
                            <quote rend="blockquote"><l>A task for many bits and rudder-sweeps as well,</l></quote>
                        </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="2"><p> he sent for the most famous and learned of philosophers, Aristotle, and
                            paid him a noble and appropriate tuition-fee. The city of Stageira, that
                            is, of which Aristotle was a native, and which he had himself destroyed,
                            he peopled again, and restored to it those of its citizens who were in
                            exile or slavery. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="3"><p>Well, then, as a place where master and pupil could labour and study, he
                            assigned them the precinct of the nymphs near Mieza, where to this day
                            the visitor is shown the stone seats and shady walks of Aristotle. It
                            would appear, moreover, that Alexander not only received from his master
                            his ethical and political doctrines, but also participated in those
                            secret and more profound teachings which philosophers designate by the
                            special terms <q type="emph">acroamatic</q> and <q type="emph">epoptic,</q>
                           <note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">i.e., fit for oral
                                teaching only, and for the initiated; <q type="emph">esoteric,</q> as opposed to
                                    <q type="emph">exoteric</q> doctrines.</note> and do not impart to many.
                        </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="4"><p>For after he had already crossed into Asia, and when he learned that
                            certain treatises on these recondite matters had been published in books
                            by Aristotle, he wrote him a letter on behalf of philosophy, and put it
                            in plain language. And this is a copy of the letter. <q type="written">Alexander, to
                                Aristotle, greeting. Thou hast not done well to publish thy
                                acroamatic doctrines; for in what shall I surpass other men if those
                                doctrines wherein I have been trained are to be all men’s common
                                property? But I had rather excel in my acquaintance with the best
                                things than in my power. Farewell.</q>
                        </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="5"><p>Accordingly, in defending himself, Aristotle encourages this ambition of
                            Alexander by saying that the doctrines of which he spoke were both
                            published and not published; for in truth his treatise on metaphysics is
                            of no use for those who would either teach or learn the science, but is
                            written as a memorandum for those already trained therein. </p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="8"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="1"><p>Moreover, in my opinion Alexander’s love of the art of healing was
                            inculcated in him by Aristotle preeminently. For he was not only fond of
                            the theory of medicine, but actually came to the aid of his friends when
                            they were sick, and prescribed for them certain treatments and regimens,
                            as one can gather from his letters. He was also by nature a lover of
                            learning and a lover of reading. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="2"><p>And since he thought and called the <title>Iliad</title> a viaticum of
                            the military art, he took with him Aristotle’s recension of the poem,
                            called the Iliad of the Casket,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Cf. <bibl n="Plut. Alex. 26.1">chapter xxvi.
                                    1.</bibl>
                            </note> and always kept it lying with his dagger under his pillow, as
                            Onesicritus informs us; and when he could find no other books in the
                            interior of Asia, he ordered Harpalus to send him some. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="3"><p>So Harpalus sent him the books of Philistus, a great many of the
                            tragedies of Euripides, Sophocles, and Aeschylus, and the dithyrambic
                            poems of Telestus and Philoxenus. Aristotle he admired at the first, and
                            loved him, as he himself used to say, more than he did his father, for
                            that the one had given him life, but the other had taught him a noble
                            life; later, however, he held him in more or less of suspicion, not to
                            the extent of doing him any harm, but his kindly attentions lacked their
                            former ardour and affection towards him, and this was proof of
                            estrangement. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="4"><p>However, that eager yearning for philosophy which was imbedded in his
                            nature and which ever grew with his growth, did not subside from his
                            soul, as is testified by the honour in which he held Anaxarchus, by his
                            gift of fifty talents to Xenocrates, and by the attentions which he so
                            lavishly bestowed upon Dandamis and Calanus.<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">See <bibl n="Plut. Alex. 65.1">chapter lxv.</bibl>
                            </note>
                        </p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>