<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10.1.31-10.1.32</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10.1.31-10.1.32</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="book" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2" n="10"><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10" n="1"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10.1" n="31"><p rend="align(indent)">They reject dialectic as superfluous; holding that in their inquiries the physicists should be content to employ the ordinary terms for things.<note resp="editor">An opinion often emphasized: <foreign xml:lang="lat">e.g.</foreign>§§ 37, 73, 82, 152. <foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Lucr. iii. 931 <foreign xml:lang="lat">sqq.</foreign></note>Now in <title rend="italic">The Canon</title> Epicurus affirms that our sensations and preconceptions and our feelings are the standards of truth; the Epicureans generally make perceptions of mental presentations<note resp="editor">Such mental pictures are caused by atoms too fine to affect sense: <foreign xml:lang="lat">cf.</foreign>§ 64<foreign xml:lang="lat">infra</foreign>; Lucr. ii. 740 <foreign xml:lang="lat">sqq.</foreign>, iv. 722 <foreign xml:lang="lat">sqq.</foreign>; Cic. <title rend="italic">N.D.</title> i. 54. On the whole subject consult Usener’s <title rend="italic">Epicurea</title>, Fr. 242-265, and, more especially, Sext. Emp. <title rend="italic">Adv. math.</title> vii. 203-216.</note> to be also standards. His own statements are also to be found in the <title rend="italic">Summary</title> addressed to Herodotus and in the <title rend="italic">Sovran Maxims.</title> Every sensation, he says, is devoid of reason and incapable of memory; for neither is it self-caused nor, regarded as having an external cause, can it add anything thereto or take anything therefrom. Nor is there anything which can refute sensations or convict them of error: </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10.1" n="32"><p>one sensation cannot convict another and kindred sensation, for they are equally valid; nor can one sensation refute another which is not kindred but heterogeneous, for the objects which the two senses judge are not the same<note resp="editor"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf. inf.</foreign>§ 146.</note>; nor again can reason refute them, for reason is wholly dependent on sensation; nor can one sense refute another, since we pay equal heed to all. And the reality of separate perceptions guarantees<note resp="editor"><foreign xml:lang="lat">i.e.</foreign> the trustworthiness of the senses (<foreign xml:lang="grc">αἰσθής εων</foreign>) considered as faculties of sense-perception: <foreign xml:lang="lat">cf.</foreign> Sext. Emp. <title rend="italic">Adv math.</title> viii. 9 (Usener, Fr. 244).</note> the truth of our senses. But seeing and hearing are just as real as feeling pain. Hence it is from plain facts that we must start when we draw inferences about the unknown.<note resp="editor">More precisely <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἄδηλον</foreign> = that which does not come within the range of sense. Compare <foreign xml:lang="lat">e.g.</foreign>§ 38 <foreign xml:lang="grc">τὸ προσμέν ον καὶ τὸ ἄδηλον,</foreign> and the way in which the conception of void is obtained in § 40. In § 62 it is called <foreign xml:lang="grc">τὸ προσδοξαζόμενον περὶ τοῦ ἀοράτου.</foreign></note> For all our notions are derived from <pb n="V2_563"/> perceptions, either by actual contact or by analogy, or resemblance, or composition, with some slight aid from reasoning. And the objects presented to madmen<note resp="editor"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Sext. Emp. <title rend="italic">Adv. math.</title> viii. 63.</note> and to people in dreams are true, for they produce effects—<foreign xml:lang="lat">i.e.</foreign> movements in the mind—which that which is unreal never does. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>