<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10.1.135-10.1.140</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10.1.135-10.1.140</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="book" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2" n="10"><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10" n="1"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10.1" n="135"><p><q type="letter" rend="merge">It is better, in short, that what is well judged in action should not owe its successful issue to the aid of chance.</q></p><p rend="align(indent)"><q type="letter" rend="merge">Exercise thyself in these and kindred precepts day and night, both by thyself and with him who is like unto thee; then never, either in waking or in dream, wilt thou be disturbed, but wilt live as a god among men. For man loses all semblance of mortality by living in the midst of immortal blessings.</q></p><pb n="V2_661"/><p rend="align(indent)">Elsewhere he rejects the whole of divination,<note resp="editor">This short note on divination is clumsily inserted between the last words of the epistle and the expositor’s natural reference to other works of Epicurus treating of ethics; Usener conjectures that it may have come from a Scholium attached to the epistle.</note> as in the short epitome, and says, <q>No means of predicting the future really exists, and if it did, we must regard what happens according to it as nothing to us.</q> </p><p rend="align(indent)">Such are his views on life and conduct; and he has discoursed upon them at greater length elsewhere.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10.1" n="136"><p rend="align(indent)">He differs from the Cyrenaics<note resp="editor">Next come excerpts dealing with the difference between Epicurean and Cyrenaic ethics.</note> with regard to pleasure. They do not include under the term the pleasure which is a state of rest, but only that which consists in motion. Epicurus admits both; also pleasure of mind as well as of body, as he states in his work <title rend="italic">On Choice and Avoidance</title> and in that <title rend="italic">On the Ethical End</title>, and in the first book of his work <title rend="italic">On Human Life</title> and in the epistle to his philosopher friends in Mytilene. So also Diogenes in the seventeenth book of his <title rend="italic">Epilecta</title>, and Metrodorus in his <title rend="italic">Timocrates</title>, whose actual words are: <q>Thus pleasure being conceived both as that species which consists in motion and that which is a state of rest.</q> The words of Epicurus in his work <title rend="italic">On Choice</title> are: <quote>Peace of mind and freedom from pain are pleasures which imply a state of rest; joy and delight are seen to consist in motion and activity.</quote> </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10.1" n="137"><p rend="align(indent)">He further disagrees with the Cyrenaics in that they hold that pains of body are worse than mental pains; at all events evil-doers are made to suffer bodily punishment; whereas Epicurus holds the pains of the mind to be the worse; at any rate the flesh endures the storms of the present alone, the mind those of the past and future as well as the present. In this way also he holds mental pleasures to be <pb n="V2_663"/> greater than those of the body. And as proof that pleasure is the end he adduces the fact that living things, so soon as they are born, are well content with pleasure and are at enmity with pain, by the prompting of nature and apart from reason. Left to our own feelings, then, we shun pain; as when even Heracles, devoured by the poisoned robe, cries aloud, 
<quote rend="blockquote">And bites and yells, and rock to rock resounds, 
<l/>Headlands of Locris and Euboean cliffs.<note resp="editor">Soph. <title rend="italic">Trach.</title> 787 f.; but our mss. read <foreign xml:lang="grc">βοῶν</foreign> for <foreign xml:lang="grc">δάκνων.</foreign></note></quote></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10.1" n="138"><p rend="align(indent)">And we choose the virtues too on account of pleasure and not for their own sake, as we take medicine for the sake of health. So too in the twentieth book of his <title rend="italic">Epilecta</title> says Diogenes, who also calls education (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀγωγή</foreign>) recreation (<foreign xml:lang="grc">διαγωγή</foreign>). Epicurus describes virtue as the <foreign xml:lang="lat">sine qua non</foreign> of pleasure, <foreign xml:lang="lat">i.e.</foreign> the one thing without which pleasure cannot be, everything else, food, for instance, being separable, <foreign xml:lang="lat">i.e.</foreign> not indispensable to pleasure.</p><p rend="align(indent)">Come, then, let me set the seal, so to say, on my entire work as well as on this philosopher’s life by citing his Sovran Maxims,<note resp="editor">This collection of forty of the most important articles of faith in the Epicurean creed was famous in antiquity. It consists of extracts from the voluminous writings of Epicurus, and may have been put together by a faithful disciple. On the other hand, Epicurus laid great stress (§§35, 36) on epitomes of his doctrine being committed to memory; so that his passion for personal direction and supervision of the studies of his pupils may have induced him to furnish them with such an indispensable catechism.</note> therewith bringing the whole work to a close and making the end of it to coincide with the beginning of happiness.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10.1" n="139"><p rend="align(indent)">1. A blessed and eternal being has no trouble himself and brings no trouble upon any other being; hence he is exempt from movements of anger and partiality, for every such movement implies weakness <add>[<emph rend="italic">Elsewhere he says that the gods are discernible by reason alone, some being numerically distinct, while others <pb n="V2_665"/> result uniformly from the continuous influx of similar images directed to the same spot and in human form.</emph>] </add></p><p rend="align(indent)">2. Death is nothing to us; for the body, when it has been resolved into its elements, has no feeling, and that which has no feeling is nothing to us. </p><p rend="align(indent)">3. The magnitude of pleasure reaches its limit in the removal of all pain. When pleasure is present, so long as it is uninterrupted, there is no pain either of body or of mind or of both together. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10.1" n="140"><p rend="align(indent)">4. Continuous pain does not last long in the flesh; on the contrary, pain, if extreme, is present a very short time, and even that degree of pain which barely outweighs pleasure in the flesh does not last for many days together. Illnesses of long duration even permit of an excess of pleasure over pain in the flesh. </p><p rend="align(indent)">5. It is impossible to live a pleasant life without living wisely and well and justly, and it is impossible to live wisely and well and justly without living pleasantly. Whenever any one of these is lacking, when, for instance, the man is not able to live wisely, though he lives well and justly, it is impossible for him to live a pleasant life. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>