<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:5.111.5</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:5.111.5</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="fre" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2"><div type="textpart" subtype="book" xml:base="cts:urn:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2" n="5"><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" xml:base="cts:urn:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:5" n="111"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="cts:urn:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:5.111" n="5"><p><quote rend="merge"> Consider then, even after we have retired; and reflect again and again, that it is for your country that you are consulting,

<note xml:lang="mul" place="unspecified"> The construction of this sentence, according to the common reading, is abandoned as desperate by all the editors. Göller and Bloomfield substitute <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἴστε</foreign> for <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἔσται;</foreign> but Poppo protests strongly against the change. With due deference to such authorities, I would venture to ask, whether the text, as it stands, may not be explained by supposing <foreign xml:lang="grc">δουλεύεσθαι</foreign> to be understood with <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἔσται</foreign>—the infinitive being suggested by the indicative at the end of the antecedent clause—and referring <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἣν</foreign> not to <foreign xml:lang="grc">πατρίδος</foreign> as has been done hitherto, but to <foreign xml:lang="grc">βουλήν</foreign>. <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐς μίαν</foreign> would then stand without its substantive, as it does Horm. Il. 2. 379, though in a different sense. Or, if that be considered a difficulty, it would perhaps be nothing inconsistent with the frequently careless style of Thucydides to suppose a confusion of two expressions, so that both <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἥν</foreign> and <foreign xml:lang="grc">μίαν</foreign> should be left in concord with <foreign xml:lang="grc">βουλήν</foreign> The sense of the passage would certainly be more natural, and the construction easier, if <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἧς</foreign> could be substituted for <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἥν:</foreign> but as MSS. afford no authority for the change, and as it does not appear absolutely necessary, it might be considered rash to adopt it.</note> which you can do but for one country, and for once, whether it prove successful or unsuccessful.

</quote></p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>