<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:1.97.1-1.98.4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:1.97.1-1.98.4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="fre" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2"><div type="textpart" subtype="book" xml:base="cts:urn:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2" n="1"><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" xml:base="cts:urn:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:1" n="97"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="cts:urn:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:1.97" n="1"><p> Now they led the allies at first as possessing independence, and deliberating in common councils; and executed, both in the field and in their administration of affairs, between this war and the Median, the following undertakings; which were achieved by them against the barbarian, and against their own innovating allies, and those of the Peloponnesians who from time to time came in contact with them in each matter.

</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="cts:urn:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:1.97" n="2"><p> I have written an account of these events, and made this digression from my history, because this subject was omitted by all before me; who either wrote the history of Greece before the Median war, or of that war itself: and Hellanicus, who <hi rend="italic">did</hi> touch on them in his Attic history, mentioned them but briefly, and not accurately with regard to their chronology. Besides, they also afford

<note xml:lang="mul" place="unspecified"> For an explanation of <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἔχει,</foreign> in the sense which I have here given to it, see Göller's note on I. 9. 2.</note> an opportunity of showing in what manner the empire of the Athenians was established. </p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" xml:base="cts:urn:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:1" n="98"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="cts:urn:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:1.98" n="1"><p> In the first place, Eion on the Strymon, of which the Medes were in possession, was taken by them after a siege, and reduced to slavery, under the command of Cimon, the son of Miltiades.

</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="cts:urn:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:1.98" n="2"><p> In the next place, Scyros, the island in the Aegean Sea, which was inhabited by Dolopes, was reduced to slavery, and colonized by themselves.

</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="cts:urn:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:1.98" n="3"><p> They had a war also with the Carystians, without the rest of the Euboeans joining in it;

</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="cts:urn:tlg0003.tlg001.1st1K-eng2:1.98" n="4"><p> and in course of time they surrendered on conditions. With the Naxians, who had revolted,

<note xml:lang="mul" place="unspecified"> This is perhaps too strong a term to use with reference to this early period of the Athenian sway, in which <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀφίστασθαι</foreign> more properly signifies

<quote> standing aloof

</quote>

(or

<quote> retiring

</quote>

)

<quote> from the confederacy.

</quote> I have used it, however, for the sake of uniformity; and especially as it is impossible to fix on any particular part of the history, at which the original verb and its cognate substantive began to be used in the more definite and full meaning which they had gradually acquired.</note> they afterwards waged war, and reduced them after a siege; and this was the first allied city that was subjugated contrary to the agreement; then the rest, as each happened. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>