<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.anastasius_sinaita_4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.anastasius_sinaita_4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="A"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="anastasius-sinaita-bio-4" n="anastasius_sinaita_4"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Anasta'sius</surname><addName full="yes">Sinaita</addName></persName></label></head><p>3. <hi rend="smallcaps">ANASTASIUS</hi>, a presbyter and monk of Mt. Sinai, called by later
      Greek writers "the New Moses" (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Μωσῆς νέος</foreign>), lived
      towards the end of 7th century, as is clear from the contents of his " Hodegus."</p><div><head>Confusion of various monks named Anastasius</head><p>There is some doubt whether the two patriarchs of Antioch were ever monks of Sinai, and
       whether the application of the epithet " Sinaita" to them has not arisen from their being
       confounded with the third Anastasius.</p></div><div><head>Works</head><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Hodegus</title> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁδηγὸς</foreign>)</head><p>The <title xml:lang="la">Hodegus</title> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁδηγὸς</foreign>),
        or <title>Guide</title>, above mentioned, a work against the Acephali, and other heretics
        who recognized only one nature in the person of Christ, is a loose, illogical rhapsody,
        without any graces of style, and very inaccurate as to facts.</p><p>This work is ascribed by Nicephorus and other writers to Anastasius I., patriarch of
        Antioch; but events are mentioned in it which occurred long after his death. Others have
        thought that he was the author of the work originally, but that it has been greatly
        interpolated. It was, however, most probably the production of the third Anastasius.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>It was published by Gretser in Greek and Latin, Ingolstadt, 1606, 4to</bibl>.</p></div></div><div><head>Other Writings</head><p>An account of the other writings ascribed to these three Anastasii, and discussions
        respecting their authorship, will be found in Fabricius (<hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi>
        x. p. 571), and Cave. (<hi rend="ital">Hist. Lit.</hi>) </p></div></div><byline>[<ref target="author.P.S">P.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>