<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0032.tlg003.perseus-eng2:20.12-20.16</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0032.tlg003.perseus-eng2:20.12-20.16</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0032.tlg003.perseus-eng2"><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="20"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="12"><p><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said direct="true" rend="merge"><said direct="false" rend="merge">
                                                        And again, all the ways
                                                of treating the soil when it is too wet for sowing
                                                or too salt for planting are familiar to all men—how
                                                the land is drained by ditches, how the salt is
                                                corrected by being mixed with saltless substances,
                                                liquid or dry. Yet these matters, again, do not
                                                always receive attention.</said></said></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="13"><p><said direct="true" rend="merge"><said direct="false" rend="merge">
                                                        Suppose a man to be wholly ignorant as to what the land
                                                can produce, and to be unable to see crop or tree on
                                                it, or to hear from anyone the truth about it, yet
                                                is it not far easier for any man to prove a parcel
                                                of land than to test a horse or to test a human
                                                being? For the land never plays tricks, but reveals
                                                frankly and truthfully what she can and what she
                                                cannot do.</said></said></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="14"><p><said direct="true" rend="merge"><said direct="false" rend="merge">
                                                        I think that just because she conceals nothing from our
                                                knowledge and understanding, the land is the surest
                                                tester of good and bad men. For the slothful cannot
                                                plead ignorance, as in other arts: land, as all men
                                                know, responds to good treatment.</said></said></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="15"><p><said direct="true" rend="merge"><said direct="false" rend="merge">
                                                        Husbandry is the clear accuser of the recreant soul. For
                                                no one persuades himself that man could live without
                                                bread; therefore if a man will not dig and knows no
                                                other profit-earning trade, he is clearly minded to
                                                live by stealing or robbery or begging—or he is an
                                                utter fool. </said></said></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="16"><p><milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><said direct="true" rend="merge"><said direct="false" rend="merge">
                                                        Farming,</said> he added, <said direct="false">may
                                                result in profit or in loss; it makes a great
                                                difference to the result, even when many labourers
                                                are employed, whether the farmer takes care that the
                                                men are working during the working hours or is
                                                careless about it. For one man in ten by working all
                                                the time may easily make a difference, and another
                                                by knocking off before the time; </said></said></p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>