6. Paintings in the Lesche of the Cnidians at Delphi.--Some of the same causes which led to the sudden development of art at Athens, in the age following that of the Persian wars, gave a similar impulse to its advancement about the same time in other places, especially at those two centres of the Greek union and religion, Olympia and Delphi. The great works at the former place have been spoken of under PHEIDIAS ; those at the latter appear to have been executed not only about the same time (or rather, perhaps, a little earlier), but also by Athenian artists chiefly. We know, for example, that the statues in the pediments of the temple at Delphi were made by PRAXIAS of Athens, the disciple of Calamis, and finished, after his death, by ANDROSTHENES, the disciple of Eucadmus (Paus. 10.19.3). These artists must have been contemporary with Pheidias and Polygnotus ; and there are some other indications of the employment of Athenian artists at Delphi about the same period (Müller, Phid. p. 28, n. y.).
Polygnotus took his subjects from the whole cycle of the epic poetry which described the wars of Troy, and the return of the Greek chieftains. There were two paintings, or rather series of paintings ; the one upon the wall on the right hand ; the other opposite to this, upon the wall on the left hand. The former represented, according to Pausanias (10.25.2), the taking of Troy, and the Grecian fleet loosing from the shores of Ilium to return home; the latter, the descent of Ulysses into the lower world, which subject seems to have been treated with especial reference to the mysteries. In both pictures the figures seem to have been arranged in successive groups, and the groups, again, in two or more lines above each other, without any attempt at perspective, and with names affixed to the several figures. To the picture on the right hand was affixed the following epigram, which was ascribed to Simonides : --
- γράψε Πολύγνωτος, Θάσιος γένος, Ἀγλαοφῶντος
- υἱὸς, περθομένην Ἰλίου ἀκρόπολιν.
Pausanias devotes seven chapters to the description of these paintings (10.25-31); from which, however, we gain little more than a catalogue of names. The numerous and difficult questions which arise, respecting the succession and grouping of the figures, the manner in which each of them was represented, the aesthetical and symbolical significations of the pictures, and so forth, have furnished a wide field of discussion for artists and archaeologists. The most important works upon the subject are the following :--Diderot, Correspond. vol. iii. pp. 270, f ed. 1831; Riepenhausen, F. et J., Peintures de Polygnote à Delphes, dessinées et yravées d'après la Descr. de Pausanias, 1826, 1829, comp. Götting. Gol. Anzeig. 1827, p. 1309; Göthe, Werke, vol. xliv. pp. 97, f., old ed., vol. xxxi. p. 118, ed. 1840 ; Böttiger, pp. 296, f.; Otto Jahn, Die Gemählde des Polygnotos in der Lesche zu Delphi, Kiel, 1841 ; and, concerning the general subject of the Greek representations of the lower world, on ancient vases, compared with the description of Polygnotus's second picture, see Gerhard's Archäologische Zeitung, 1843, 1844, Nos. xi.--xv. and Plates 11-15.