The six books of a common-weale
Jean Bodin
Bodin, Jean. The six books of a common-weale. Knolles, Richard, translator. London: G. Bishop, 1606.
SEeing that the Magistrat next unto the Soueraigne Prince, is the principall person in the Commonweale, & upon whom they which have the soueraigntie discharge themselves, communicating unto him the authoritie, force, and power to commaund: it is good reason before we passe further, briefly to touch what obedience he oweth unto his Soueraigne Prince; which is the chiefe part of his dutie. Now in this the Prince and Magistrat, and both of them do most differ from a priuat[*](How much a prince differeth from a magistrat, and both of them from a priuat an.) man: for that the Prince seeth no man in the state or Commonweal, whome he may compare or preferre before himselfe; but as one placed in a most high degree, and next unto the immortall God, beholdeth all his subiects set a great way beneath him: wheras the priuat man cannot by any publike right commaund over any other subiect, although that he by priuat and domesticall commaunds rule and gouerne his owne familie. As for the Magistrat, for that he is to regard many persons, hee must oftentimes change his port, his gesture, his speech and countenance, for the good performance of his dutie towards all: which no man can well discharge, except he first know his duty towards his Soueraigne prince, as also how to submit himselfe unto the other Magistrats his superiours, how to respect his equals, and how to commaund his inferiours, how to defend the weake, to withstand the great, and to doe iustice to all. And that is it, for which the auntients commonly said, Magistracie or authoritie to declare what was in a man, hauing as it were upon the stage in the Theatre, and in the sight of all men, to performe the parts of many persons. And so also may we say, A man to show what his office is: For if he be such an one as he ought to be, hee graceth his place: whereas if he bee otherwise, hee debaseth not only the authoritie of his place and office; but euen of the maiestie of the state and Commonweale. So Liuie speaking of Quintus Flaminius, a man vnworthy his high place, saith of him, Non qui sibi honorem adiecisset, sed indignitate sua vim ac ius Magistratui quem gerebat dempsisset, That hee had not (by
Now the better to know what obedience the Magistrat oweth unto his Soueraign, it is needfull first to vnderstand, what it is that a Soueraigne Prince may of right commaund[*](The lawful commaunds of soueraigne princes right diuers.) every Magistrat to doe. For why, the lawfull commands of Soueraigne Princes are right diuers, and vnlike themselves. Some of them seruing for perpetuall edicts or lawes concerning all persons, of what condition or qualitie soeuer they bee; or but for certaine persons, and for a certaine time, by way of prouision: othersome containe some priuilege or exemption contrarie to the edicts or lawes, for some one onely, or for some few of the subiects: or some graunt not contrarie unto the law, or some reward for the good, or punishment for the euill, or some office or commission; or else serue for the expounding of some edict or priuilege, or for the denouncing of warre, or the making of peace, or for raising of souldiours, or for the erecting of Faires or Markets, or for the leuying of taxes, subsidies, fifteenes, new impositions, or loanes: or for the sending of ambassadours to congratulat the good haps of other princes; or to mone their misfortunes, or to entreat of marriages, and alliances, or other such like things; or for the building or fortifying of places to be fortified, for the repairing of bridges, hie wayes, ports or passages, or for to iudge of certaine suits and proceedings in the law, or for the execution of some commaunds, or for the maintenance of letters of iustice, or for the restoring of such as be under age, or of full age, or of such as be condemned, or for some particularitie, or for some remission, or pardon, which may bee of diuers sorts. Of which commaunds so before declared, some containe diuers kinds, as do priuileges and graunts, whether it be for some gift giuen, or for exemption and immunitie from all charges, or from some one: or letters of discharge, or of estate, or to have the freedome of a citisen, or for to be made legitimat, or for nobilitie, or knighthood, or for the erecting of corporations or colleges, or other such like things. All which letters may be divided into two sorts, that is to say, into letters of iurisdiction or commaund, or letters of iustice or state. Albeit that the word Iubemus, or we commaund, be as well in the letters of iustice, as in the letters of grace and favour, as is to bee seene in the lawes and letters pattents of the Greeke emperours. Yet the letters of grace, or which proceed from the onely power and authoritie of the prince, are properly in Fraunce called Mandements, or Commands; and the secretaries which dispatch them are also called the Secretaries of the Commaunds: whereas the letters of iustice are most commonly dispatched by the other secretaries; beside the difference of the great and little seale, and for the most part the diuersitie of the waxe: or the single or double labell, or the seale hanging in silke of diuers colours, making the difference of the letters to be knowne. The auntient Latines called such instructions as were by princes giuen to their ambassadours, or gouernours of countries, or generals of their armies, Mandata Principum, or Princes Commands, which we do call by the name of of instructions: For so the word Mandat--- is taken in the law, where Iustinian the emperour saith, That hee had made a booke of Mandats or Commaundements for the gouernours of prouinces.
But leauing the subtilitie of words, let vs go unto the matter, and examine the force[*](The power and force of certaine clauses commonly set down in the letters patents, and princes Mandats expounded.) of the clauses commonly set downe in the letters patents and mandates of princes. And first these wordes, Vniuersis praesentibus & futuris (To all men present and to come) are ioyned onely unto such letters patents as are to endure for euer: (howbeit that no worldly thing can so for euer continue) but not unto temporarie edicts made by way of prouision, nor to commissions, nor to any other letters of prouision. But this clause, Quantum satis est &c. (so much as shall suffice) is of much greater importance,
We have before (as we suppose) sufficiently enough declared, what and how much[*](What commands of the prince, and how far the magistrat eught to execute the same.) a prince may doe by the right of his soueraigntie, from whence many things may be deriued pertinent unto this question here in hand: for why it is not well to be vnderstood what obedience is by the magistrat due unto the soueraigne maiestie, except the rights of Soueraigntie be before well vnderstood and fully knowne. But here the question is, what commaunds of the prince, and how farre the magistrat ought to execute the same? for sometime dishonest and vniust thinges are by princes commaunded, which the euill magistrats themselves do more willingly, and shamefully put in execution, than they were by the princes commaunded. As not long agoe in the time of the civill warres, (wherewith all Fraunce was on a light fyer) the president of the court of Normandie (whose name deserueth to be buried in perpetuall obliuion) beeing commaunded extraordinarily to leuie thirtie thousand crownes of them which professed the reformed religion, extorted from them three hundred thousand; and for so doing (the calamitie of the time considered) receiued a great reward. Howbeit that Tiberius the emperour (a man of incredible crueltie) sharply reproued the gouernour of Aegypt for exacting more of the subiects than he was commaunded: saying, Tonderioues meas non cutem detrahi volo, I would have my sheepe shorne, but not flaine. If therefore the commaundement of the prince be not contrarie unto the lawes of God and nature, the magistrat is to put it in execution, although it seeme to differ from the lawes of other nations: which lawes it is not against nature for the princes to chaunge, for the profit or disprofit of their Commonweales. For albeit that the princes (as wee have said) ought to keepe the oath by him made unto his people, if hee have so bound himselfe by oath; and although hee were not by oath so bound, yet neuerthelesse of duetie ought to keepe the lawes and customes of the estate and Commonweal whereof hee is soueraigne: yet for all that wee must not thereof conclude or gather, That if the prince doe in that case commaund any thing contrarie unto his oath or the duetie of a Prince, that the Magistrat is therefore to refuse to obey his commaund. Forasmuch as it belongeth not unto the Magistrat to examine or censure the doings[*](The is noto censure his princes cōmand, beeing not contrari unto the lawes of God & nature.) of his prince, or to crosse his proceedings concerning mans lawes, from which the prince may as he seeth cause derogat. Yet if the Magistrat bee commaunded by the Prince to abrogat an auntient law, being more upright and profitable to giue way unto another lesse iust, and lesse profitable for the Commonweale; he may stay the execution of such a law or commaundement in suspense, vntill he have shewed his reasons therefore unto the prince, which he is in dutie bound to do, not once, but euen twice or thrice: and then if the prince notwithstanding his remonstrances, will not by him be aduised, but refuse his wholsome and profitable admonition, and will needes have the law to passe further; then the Magistrat (as hauing alreadie done his dutie) shall put it in execution: which he may also at the first commaund of his prince doe, if the delaying thereof be daungerous. And to that end and purpose tendeth that which is by Innocentius the fourth written, before he was Pope, That Magistrats ought to put in execution the princes commaunds, albeit that they be vniust: which is to bee vnderstood of civill iustice and vtilitie: but not if such commaunds bee contrarie to the lawes of nature. Which interpretation may serue also for the right understanding of that which the lawyers say, That the prince may derogat euen from the law of nature. VVherin[*](How it is to be vnderstood that a prince may derogate from the law of nature.) their meaning is, from the law of nations, and common constitutions of other people: least any deceiued by the obscuritie of the words, or equiuocation of the law of nature, should thereby rashly presume to breake the sacred lawes of God and nature.
The same opinion we are to haue, if the prince by his letters patents command the[*](How the Magistrat commaunded by his prince to put in execution old penall lawes, now of themselves or through the negligence of the magistrats forgotten, is to proceed in the execution thereof.) Magistrat to proceed to the execution of the penaltie uppon them that haue offended against such his edicts and lawes, as by the antiquitie of themselves, or by the negligence of the Magistrats seeme to have bene quite forgotten and abrogated. For why, the long sufferance of the prince, and conniuence of the magistrats, in the sight and knowledge of whome the lawes are so broken, remitteth the penaltie due by the law: which could not otherwise have bene infringed, by the abuse of them which transgressed the same, had it by the prince or magistrat bene still looked vnto. And therefore the magistrat ought not rashly to proceed to the execution of the penaltie of such forgotten or neglected lawes, before he have caused the same to be againe republished, being by his default before neglected. Yea the prince ought rather to proceed against his magistrats, who through their remisse negligence have suffered his edicts and lawes to be contemned. For otherwise it should be a thing verie vniust and sauouring of tyrannie, to make edicts and lawes, and after long neglecting of them, upon a sodaine to proceed against them, who by the example of others, had transgressed against them, seeing others before them to have escaped vnpunished. Which was one of the tyrannicall slights of the most cruell emperour Nero, as of other auntient tyrants also. Wheras the good emperour Traian to the contrarie commaunded Plinie gouernour of the lesser Asia, of new to publish such edicts and lawes as were any wise before buried in obliuion, by the disobedience or errour of his subiects, or the sufferance of the magistrats: for that a common errour is reputed for a law, if the errour bee not against the law of nature, against which no errour can probably be pretended.
But some man may aske, Whether the magistrat owe obedience unto such his princes commaunds, as shall unto him seeme contrarie unto the law of nature, albeit
But yet farther question might be made, VVhether a magistrat may bee suffered to[*](Whether a magistrate be to be suffered to giue up his place, rather than to allow an edict or commaund of his prince which he for certaine thinketh to be vniust, and contrarie unto reason) giue up his place, rather than he will allow an edict, a commission, or commandement from his prince, which he for certaine thinketh to be vniust and contrarie vnto naturall reason, when as the equitie of it is called in question, & especially if the other magistrats and multitude of the people shall hold it to be iust, contrarie to the others. For the force of iustice, and power of upright reason, is not perceiued but of the fewer and wiser sort: and a wise man being as it were the rule of reason, is of all others the greatest enemie unto the multitude. VVhich if it be so, why should a wise man bee enforced to giue his consent unto the multitude of mad magistrats. In which case I say, that the magistrat is not to be suffered to giue up his place, if it please not his soueraign prince he should so do, but ought rather to bee constrained to obey his princes commaunds, if the equitie thereof being called in doubt, be approued by the greater part of the magistrats, which have charge to confirme such edicts: For otherwise if they should be permitted to giue up their places, rather than to passe an edict approued by others, it would open a perilous gap to all the subiects, by their example to refuse and reiect the edicts and commaunds of their prince: and so euerie one in his charge might leaue the Commonweale unto danger, and expose it unto the tempest, as a ship without a Rudder, and that under the shadow of an opinion of iustice▪ which may haply be but a deuise of a subtill braine, to no other purpose than to contradict the more common opinion. And therefore among the most lawdable laws made by Lewes the xij, there is one which importeth, That if the judges be of three or moe opinions, those which were the fewer in number should be constrained to conforme and ioyne themselves unto one of the greater parties, for the concluding of the decrees. VVhereupon the court of Paris of long time doubted, whether this law should be published or not: for that it seemed a very hard and a most strange thing unto many, to force the conscience of the judges contrarie to their owne opinions, and so enforce them to iudge contrarie to that they ought, and that especially in such things as were committed unto the wisedome and deuotion of the judges, as are almost all both publike and priuat
And yet neuerthelesse since the law of Lewes the xij. I find not that any magistrat hath giuen up his place, as fearing to be inforced to maintaine or yeeld to any opinion contrarie unto his conscience: and especially since the places of justice were giuen unto men for vertue, and not for reward and favour. Neither hath the law of Lewes the xij. at any time constrayned the judges to iudge contrarie unto their conscience, but hath rather silently giuen them leaue to giue up their places; howbeit that it were more equitie so to constraine them, than to leaue it vnto their will and pleasure. For which cause the kings Attourneyes general haue oftentimes constrained the Iudges to iudge according unto Lawes and customes of the land, albeit that all the Iudges were of contrarie opinion. As I remember that whilest I was at Tholouse, one Bartholomew President of one of the Chambers of Inquirie, seeing all the counsellours of his court of one and the same opinion in a suit, and directly against the law: after he had assembled all the rest of the courts upon the matter, he constrayned them to change their opinions, and to iudge according to the law; And that iustly also: for who enforced thee to seeke for thine office? or to accept of it being offered thee? and hauing taken it upon thee, (being happily got either by suspending of voices, or by sure, or briberie,) and being sworne, wilt thou now forsweare the lawes, which thou mightest before have red, or at least wise oughtest to have red? wilt thou by thy false opinion of the law and iustice, wrong the place thou bearest? delude the lawes? or forsake thy prince and Commonweale.
Yet sometime it happeneth that such lawes as of themselves seeme unto every man[*](Wh the magistrate is to d in case the law otherwise▪ iust, now upon som soden occutrents to be har and vniust.) most iust, may upon some suddein occurent appeare and proue to be most vniust. In which case, whereas the wrong is in the fact presented plaine and euident, wise magistrats vse to certifie the king thereof, (as I remember it to have most oftentimes bene done in the parliament at Paris,) who imparting the matter unto his Counsell, doth as he seeth cause derogate from the positiue law; or adde some thing unto the same:
Now there is great difference whether question be of the lawes alreadie established, or of those which yet are by the magistrat to be published. For why, such as be alreadie established, every man is bound to keepe, and especially the magistrats, who if they wittingly swarue therefrom, (beside the penaltie appointed by the law) are subiect also unto the note of infamie, as periurours and forsworne men. But as for such Edicts and[*](Great care to be had by the greater magistrats in the publication of lawes.) lawes as are not yet published, but are but as yet presented unto the magistrats to be confirmed and published, of them it behoueth the greater magistrats (to whom the publication of lawes especially appertaineth) well to consider, and to show the reasons if they shall dislike of them vnto the prince, albeit that it concerne but the particular interest of some one priuat person; but much more, in case it concerne the great harme or good of the Commonweale: which good if it be verie great, may in some sort cover the iniustice of the law; (as the auntient states-men say.) Yet must we not proceed so farre in respecting of the publike profit be it neuer so great, as therefore to forget reason, and to be caried headlong with wrong and iniustice: as were in auntient time the Lacedemonians, who measured all iustice by the common profit, whereunto they directed all their lawes, all their iudgements, and counsels; so that if that were once in question, neither oath, nor reason, nor iustice, nor yet the law of nature was by them[*](Better it is for the magistrat of himselfe to giue way unto the law contrarie unto the lawes of God and nature.) once respected. But much better it were for the Commonweale, and more beseeming the dignitie of the magistrat, of himselfe to giue up his office (as did the Chauncelour of Philip the second, duke of Burgundie) than to giue way unto a law that is contrarie unto the lawes of God and nature, or that in every mans iudgement seemeth to be dishonest or vniust; howbeit the Duke seeing the irremoueable constancie of his Chauncelour, readie to giue up his office, thought it better to reuoke such his commaunds, than to want so stout & wise a man. Which so constant resolutions of the magistrats, hath oftentimes preserued Princes from infamie, lawes from decay, and Commonweales[*](That a princes faults which cannot be amended ought by all meanes to be of the magistrate coured.) from destruction. But when such constancie cannot heale the diseases of the Commonweale, or faults of soueraigne princes; and that the prince commaundeth the magistrats, to have his actions excused unto his subiects; it is much better for the magistrat to obey his commaund, and in so doing to cover and burie the memorie of a wicked fact alreadie done, than in refusing so to do, to irritate the prince to the doing of worse; and so (as they say) to cast the helue after the hatchet. As did Papinian the great Gouernour of the empire, (and by Seuerus the Emperour in his will appointed Tutor unto the yong emperours Anthonius Caracalla, and Geta his sonnes) who by Caracalla commaunded to excuse unto the Senat the murder by him committed upon the person of his brother Geta, would therein do nothing, but cut him off with this sharpe and short answere, saying, That murthers were more hardlie excused, than committed: which was of him more stoutly then wisely said. For Caracalla with this aunswere enraged, and yet not satisfied with his brothers blood, in his rage commaunded
But what if the prince shall command any thing to be done, and that the same thing[*](A princes commaund being begun to bee put in execution, whether it b by the princes contrary commaund to giuen ouer.) being begun to be put in execution, he changing his mind shall reuoke his former commaund; shall the magistrat in this case stay from proceeding any further, or go on with that he hath begun? Whereunto a man at the first sight would say, That he ought to stay and to proceed no farther: following therein the maximes of the law. Howbeit to aunswere rightly thereunto, the matter is by distinction to be opened; that is to wit, that if the thing so begun may be left off without the publike harme, it is then so to bee left off according to the last commaund: but if it be so begun, as that it cannot bee left off, whithout the manifest hurt of the state and Commonweale; the magistrat in this case is to proceed on with that he hath so begun, notwithstanding the latter countermaund, and that especially in matters of warre; as wee have before said. And to this[*](Great things by great men vndertaken, ought also to be by them performed, or else neuer taken in hand.) purpose Marcellus the Consull saith, Multa magnis ducibus sicut non aggredienda, ita semel aggressis non dimittenda. As many things are not of great captaines to be at all taken in hand: so being once by them vndertaken, are not by them to bee againe giuen ouer. And this in time of warre. But if at home the magistrat following the commandement to him giuen, hath begun to execute the condemned, or them that the prince hath commaunded to be put to death, he ought forthwith to surcease from any further execution, if the commaundement be reuoked: and not to do, as did the Consull Fuluius, who hauing taken the citie of Capua, as he was punishing the authors of the rebellion, and had now caused the greater part of the Senators of that citie to bee beheaded, receiuing letters from the Senat of Rome, willing him to stay and cease the execution, put those letters in his bosome, without reading of them, & doubting of the contents thereof, proceeded to the execution of the rest, vntill he had put to death fourescore of them. True it is, that the Senat had no power in any thing to commaund the Consuls (as we have before said) yet for all that, the gouernours of prouinces, and the generals of the Roman armies, yea a---d the Consuls also, used most commonly to be obedient
Now all that we have hitherto said, is to be vnderstood onely of such letters or rescripts of commaund, as yet carrie with them no power for the magistrat to examine the fact or matter they concerne. But then what shall wee say, if such rescripts or commaunds report such things as certainely knowne and true, which yet are neither publikely, nor unto the magistrat so knowne to be. Heere we must againe consider, whether[*](Whether the magistrate b to examine the trueth of that he is by the prince commaunded, before he proceede to the examination thereof?) the examination of the matter, be by speciall commaund expresly taken from the magistrat, or else left unto him: if it be left unto him, there is then no doubt, but that the magistrat may and ought to enquire of the truth of such things, as are reported in the princes rescripts or letters: but if al examination of the matter be taken from the magistrat, then some doubt, whether he may inquire of the truth thereof or not; and especially if it be expressed in the rescript or mandate, that the prince being well enformed of the truth, commaundeth the magistrat to proceede to the execution of his letters or commaunds: howbeit the best opinion is, that the magistrat both in the one case and the other, ought to examine the truth of the matter. For when to inquire of the truth of the cause, is neither forbidden nor commaunded, although it bee expressed in the princes rescripts or letters, to proceede to execution, yet ought the magistrat neuerthelesse to examine the truth of the mater. And to the intent, that the magistrats should not pretend to excuse themselves by ignorance, the emperour Constantine, prouided by an expresse law, that the magistrats should inquire, whether these things were true or not, which were set downe in his rescripts or letters of commaund, whether it were so in them expressed, or left out. And as for the other point, if in the rescripts or letters, it be expresly set downe to proceede to execution, for that the prince is well enformed of the truth of the matter; yet neuerthelesse ought the magistrat to examine the truth thereof: notwithstanding the clause which I have said, which ought not to hinder the examination of the matter, nor to be preiudiciall to any other mans right; and so much lesse unto the publike, and least of all unto the truth: and so generally, all such narratiue clauses as are but reported in rescripts, mandates, commissions, lawes, priviledges, testaments, and sentences, cannot be any thing preiudiciall unto the truth. And albeit, that during the tyranny of the Sforces, they made a law, that all faith and credence should be giuen unto the princes commaunds and letters; yet was the same law againe disanulled, after that they were by the French, driuen out of the estate of Milan. And if the faith and credite must needes bee giuen unto the narratiue clauses of princes rescripts and letters of commaund, that is to bee vnderstood, onely of such clauses, as whereby the obscure places of their edicts, and lawes, commissions, mandates, or iudgements are expounded, which none can better declare, then they themselves that made them; howbeit, that such their declarations ought rather to be called decrees, then expositions or declarations. But if the prince shall in the bestowing of offices, places of charge, or other his grants in his rescripts or letters, testifie for the fidelity, integrity, wisedome, or religion of any man, it is so farre from, that the magistrat should rest contented
But if any man under a false pretensed colour shall encroach uppon the prince the profits and commodities unto him graunted, being in the princes rescript expressed, yet is he thereof by the magistrat to be embarred; and the rather, if the common treasure be with immoderat gifts exhausted: unto which disease euerie where spreading, remedie might be giuen, if the law of Valois concerning gifts might take place. For Philip Valois the French king, commaunded those gifts and graunts to bee reuoked from them, who in the letters of such gifts or graunts, had not expressed what they or any other for them, had for the same cause in the letters of their graunts, before obtained; which yet also is in vse in Millan. For seeing that it much concerneth the Commonweale what money and profit, what rewards, and priuileges, every man obtaine---h, the magistrats[*](It much conneth the Commonweale what gifts or priuileges be graunted unto particular men.) must thereunto have a most vigilant eye, and especially in popular estates, wherin as all publike things lie open unto the spoyle of all men; so for the same cause occasion is ministred vnto the seditious, to the trouble and oftentimes to the ruine of the Commonweale. And for this cause it was most straitly prouided by a law in the twelue tables, that no priuilege or dispensation might in any wise be graunted, and that upon paine of death, but onely in the great assembly of the whole estate of the people: the words of the law being these, Priuilegia nisi Commitijs Centuriatis ne irroganto, qui secus faxit Capital esto, ---et no priuilege be graunted, but in the great and general assembly of the people: and he that shall otherwise doe, let him die the death. And after that Constantine the emperour writing unto the people, saith, Nec d---mnosa fi---co, nec legibus contraria impetrari oportet, ---t is not fit, things hurtfull unto the common treasure, or[*](Priuileg things odious and unto the law, how they are to be interpreted.) contrarie unto the laws, to be obtained▪ howbeit that all priuileges are directly contrarie unto the law; for otherwise they should not be priuileges. And i--- it bee so, that they must needs passe after the second commaund (as we have before said) yet beseemeth it the magistrat to cut them short, and to interpret them in strictest maner that he can, and to the least hurt of the Commonweale, as things odious, and contrarie unto the law; and not by favourable interpretations to encrease their strength, or to draw them into consequence, as heretofore haue the judges and the clergie, which by their faire gloses, have drawne the profit and priuileges graunted onely unto souldiors, unto themselves also; vsing these faire gloasing words, of worldly Souldiours and heauenly Souldiours: so laying all the burthen upon the poore countrey man, unto whom the same priuileges ought of better right to be communicated than to them.
But for that our purpose is not here to enter into the disputing of priuileges, which[*](Priuileges to be most straitly examined.) were a thing infinit, sufficeth it in passing by, in generall to aduertise the magistrat to have speciall regard unto the priuileges by princes graunted, and most straitly to examine
But what if the prince by his rescript or letters pattents, shall expresly forbid the magistrat[*](Whether the magistrat expressely forbidden to examin the trueth of things contained in the princes grants or letters, may yet passe beyond such his soueraignes prohibition.) to examine the truth of such things as are contained in them, albeit that they be false or doubtfull; ought the magistrat in this case to examine the matter? And it seemeth that he ought so to doe: For we have before said, that hee may, and ought to examine the cause, and enquire of the truth of things expressed in the princes rescripts and letters, albeit that the prince therein declare himselfe to know the truth thereof. Yet for all that, I say, that it belongeth not unto the magistrat in this case to passe beyond the prohibition of his soueraigne prince: For there is great difference when the prince declareth, That he knoweth the truth; and when he forbiddeth to enquire therof: For in him it is to be presumed, that he hath bene circumuented, and so mistaking things false for true, and things vnknowne for knowne, to haue commaunded them so to be put into his rescript, which he would not have done, had hee beene truely thereof enformed: As if hee should giue a judges place unto a souldior, or a captaines place
Now if a man should say that a Prince ought not to commaund any thing that is dishonest or vniust, he therein sayth well: neither ought the prince (if it were possible) to commaund any thing not beseeming his honour, or that were so much as subiect unto reprehension or slaunder, or knowing the magistrates to be of contrarie opinion unto his, to constraine them thereunto: for that the ignorant and common people is no way more moued unto disloyaltie, and contempt of their princes edicts and lawes, then to see the magistrates hardly delt withall, and the lawes by them contrarie to their[*](Whether the magistrat commaunded by his prince any thing contrarie to the common profit, or course of civill iustice, ought to obey such his princes commaund, or to giue up his place.) good liking published and forced. But now here the question is, what the magistrat ought to doe, in case the prince forgetting his duetie, commaund any thing contrarie to the common profit and civill iustice; yet prouided still that it be not against the law of God and nature: whether the magistrat ought to obey such his princes commaund, or to giue up his place? And if so it be, that the worldly magistrat ought to be obeyed, albeit that he commaund such things as are vniust: Ne Praetoris matestas contempta videatur, Lest the maiestie of the Praetor should seeme to be contemned (as saith the law) how much more then ought men to obey their soueraigne Prince, of the maiestie of whom all magistrates depend? Now it is in many lawes repeated that we must obey the magistrat, whether the thing that he commaundeth be iust or not, following the counsell of all the wise which have hereof written. And to this purpose saith Cicero (albeit that he was a mortall enemie unto the Tribunes of the people) that men were to obey euen the vniust oppositions of the Tribunes, in these words: Parere iube--- lex intercessori, quo nihil praestantius: impediri enim bonam rem melius est, quàm concedi malè, The law (saith he) commaundeth vs to obey the magistrat that opposeth himselfe, then which nothing is better: for better it is a good thing to be crossed then euill graunted. And before he had said: Nihil exitiosius ciuitatibus, nihil tam contrarium iuri ac legibus, nihil minùs ciuile & humanum, quàm composita & constituta republica quicquam agi per vim, Nothing is more dangerous unto cities, nothing more contrarie unto right and law, nothing more vncivill or inhumaine, then in a well ordered[*](Dangerous unto Commonweales for the the magistrates to refuse to put in execution their princes Edicts or commaunds.) and setled Commonweale to have any thing done by force. We oft times see the subiects to take up armes against their prince, the lawes violated, and iustice go to wracke, and all for the false opinion that the people have of the equitie and integritie of the judges, refusing to verifie and put in execution the Edicts and commaunds of their prince. O but say they it is an vniust Edict or law, neither can we, nor ought we, to obey the same: an honest speech, if indeed thou canst not; but where learnedst thou that thou oughtest not? from whence haddest thou that doctrine? wilt thou (being a