<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.tzetzes_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.tzetzes_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="T"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="tzetzes-bio-2" n="tzetzes_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">Isaac</forename><surname full="yes">Tzetzes</surname></persName></head><p>2. <hi rend="smallcaps">ISAAC</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἰσυάκιος
       Τζέτζης</foreign>), brother of the preceding.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Commentary on the Cassandra of Lycophron</head><p>He is named in the manuscripts as the author of the commentary on the Cassandra of
        Lycophron.</p><p>It appears however from passages in his works, that Joannes Tzetzes claimed it as his
        production (<hi rend="ital">Chil.</hi> ix. hist. 298; comp. Schol. <hi rend="ital">ad
         Lycophr. 83</hi>). The same claim is made in a letter of Joannes Tzetzes to the
        Protonotarius Basilius Achridenus, printed in Fabricius, vol. iii. p. 753, and in
        Küster's Suidas, <hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
        <foreign xml:lang="grc">Λυκόφρων</foreign>. In <hi rend="ital">Chil.</hi> viii. hist.
        204, Joannes says that some other grammarian attempted to set up a claim to be the author of
        the commentary, but was speedily detected. The last editor, J. C. Muller, is of opinion that
        Isaac Tzetzes first published a commentary on Lycophron, and that Joannes Tzetzes
        subsequently published an enlarged and improved edition of it. Of this he finds traces in
        the manuscripts, some of which contain apparently the older edition of Isaac, others the
        improved edition of Joannes, the additions exhibiting not only the learning, but the
        arrogant self-complacency of Joannes. The latter moreover does tell us that his brother
        Isaac wrote a commentary on Lycophron (Schol. <hi rend="ital">ad Hesiod.</hi> Proleg.
         <foreign xml:lang="grc">καὶ τῷ ἐμῇ δὲ ἀδελφῷ ἐκπεπόνηται λίαν κάλλιστα καὶ
         φιλοτιμότατα περὶ τούτου ἐν τῇ τοῦ Λυκόφρονος ἐξηγήσει</foreign>; comp. <hi rend="ital">Chil.</hi> 8.486).</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The commentary is printed in several of the editions of Lycophron, as in that
          printed at Basel, 1546</bibl>; <bibl>in those of Canter (Basel, 1566)</bibl>,
          <bibl>Stephanus (1601)</bibl>, <bibl>Potter (Oxon. 1697)</bibl>, <bibl>Owen (Oxon.
          1702)</bibl>, <bibl>Sebastiani (Rome, 1803)</bibl>. <bibl>The best edition of the
          commentary, without the text of Lycophron, is that by Müller (Leipzig, 1811).
         </bibl></p></div></div></div><byline>[<ref target="author.C.P.M">C.P.M</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>