<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.theodorus_8</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.theodorus_8</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="T"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="theodorus-bio-8" n="theodorus_8"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Theodo'rus</surname><addName full="yes">ANAGNOSTES</addName></persName></head><p>8. <hi rend="smallcaps">ANAGNOSTES</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀναγνώστης</foreign>)
      or <hi rend="smallcaps">LECTOR</hi>, the <hi rend="smallcaps">READER</hi>, an ecclesiastical
      historian, generally supposed to have written in the reign of the emperor Justin I., or his
      successor Justinian I. Nothing of his personal history is known, except that he held the
      subordinate ecclesiastical post of reader at Constantinople, and, as Suidas states, in the
      great church (Suidas, <hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>). Suidas states that he brought down his
      history to the time of Justinian I. : and though nothing in the extant fragments of his works
      leads us to a later time than the accession of Justin I., we may not unreasonably admit the
      correctness of Suidas' statement, so far as to place the composition of the history of
      Theodore in the reign of Justinian. Theodore is quoted by Joannes Damascenus and by
      Theophanes, and in the <title>Acta</title> of the second Nicene (seventh (General Council),
      all in the eighth century.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>He was the author of two works on ecclesiastical history, which were sometimes both
       comprehended <pb n="1048"/> under the general title of <title xml:lang="grc">Ἐκκλησιαστικὴ Ἱστορια</title>, <hi rend="ital">Historia Ecclesiastica,</hi> and
       referred to as constituting one work. They are, in fact, two consecutive works on one
       subject.</p><div><head>1. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἐκλογὴ ἐκ τῶν ἐκκλησιαστικῶν ἱστοριῶν</foreign>,
         <title xml:lang="la">Selecta ex Historiis Ecclesiasticis</title></head><p>A compendium of Church history from the time of Constantine the Great, in two books,
        compiled chiefly from Sozomen, with additions from Socrates and Theodoret. It is probable
        that Theodore intended that this compendium should comprehend the whole period included in
        the histories from which he made his extracts : but if so, the work was not completed; for
        it breaks off at the death of Constantius II. From its incomplete state it was probably the
        latter of Theodore's two works in the order of composition, and was apparently designed as
        an introduction to the other.</p></div><div><head>2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἐκκλησιαστικὴ ἱστορία</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">Historia Ecclesiastica.</title></head><p>An original work on ecclesiastical history, also in two books, comprehending the period
        from the reign of Theodosius the younger, where Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret end to the
        reign of Justin I., perhaps of Justinian I. From the circumstance of this work commencing
        from the point where the earlier ecclesiastical histories cease, it is inferred that the
        compendium just mentioned was intended to come down to the same point, and consequently that
        it was never completed. Its incompleteness occasioned a void of seventy years to be left
        between the close of one, and the commencement of the other of Theodore's works.</p><p>The compendium is extant in MS., in the library of St. Mark at Venice, though the MS. is
        mutilated at the beginning. A copy (whether transcribed from the Venetian MS. is not known)
        was in the possession of Allatius, who intended to publish it, but who never fulfilled his
        intention ; nor has it ever been published. Allatius sent a transcript of some portions to
        Valesius, who employed it in correcting the text of his edition of the original authors.</p><p>Theodore's own history is lost, except some extracts <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀπὸ
         φωνῆς Νικηφόρου Καλλίστου τοῦ Ξανθοπούλου</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">ex ore
         Nieephori Callisti Xanthopuli.</hi> As Nicephorus never in his own <hi rend="ital">Ecclesiastical History</hi> quotes Theodore, except for statements contained in these
        extracts, it is fairly inferred by Valesius that the original was not in his hands; and that
        the extracts were made by some one before his time, and were all the remains of Theodore's
        work then extant, at least all that he had access to.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>These extracts (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἐκλογαί</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Excerpta</hi>) were first published by Robert Stephens, with Eusebius and the other
          Greek ecclesiastical historians, fol. Paris, 1544</bibl>; <bibl>and again, with the Latin
          version of Christopherson, fol. Geneva, 1612 </bibl>: but <bibl>the best edition is that
          of Henri Valois, or Valesius; who published them with the ecclesiastical histories of
          Theodoret, Evagrius, and Philostorgius, fol. Paris, 1673</bibl>, <bibl>reprinted under the
          care of Reading, fol. Cambridge, 1720, and again at Turin, 1748.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>Other Works</head><div><head>Further Information</head><p><bibl>Valesius published not only the <title>Excerpta</title> of Nicephorus, but some
          other fragments of Theodore.</bibl><bibl>Combéfis, in his <title xml:lang="la">Originum Rerumque CPolitanarum
           Manipulus,</title> and Bandurius in his <title xml:lang="la">Imperium Orientale,</title>
          have given an anonymous work <foreign xml:lang="grc">Παραστάσεις σύντομοι
           χρονικαί</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Breves Demonstrationes</hi> s. <hi rend="ital">Enarrationes Chronographicae,</hi> in which are some citations from a <foreign xml:lang="grc">Θεόδωρος</foreign>, Theodorus, or <foreign xml:lang="grc">Θεόδωρος
           Ἀναγνώστης</foreign>, Theodorus Lector, or <foreign xml:lang="grc">Θεόδωρος
           Χρονογράφος ἀναρρωσθεὶς ἀναγνώσμασιν</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Theodorus
           Chronographus Lectionibus clarus</hi></bibl> (comp. Combéfis, pp. 11, 12, 19, 33,
         ed. Paris, 1664; Bandurius, vol. i. p. iii. pp. 88, 89, 93, 102, ed. Paris, 1711).</p></div></div></div><div><head>Date</head><p>If these references are to one and the same writer, and that writer the subject of this
       article, as critics generally seem to admit, he must have written on other subjects than
       ecclesiastical history, and have lived at a considerably later period than is generally
       supposed.</p><p>The extracts chiefly or wholly relate to the statues with which Constantinople was adorned;
       and one of them (p. 11, Combéfis, p. 88, Bandurius) contains a curious incident in the
       personal history of the writer which shows him to have lived in the reign of the emperor
       Philippicus (<date when-custom="711">A. D. 711</date>-<date when-custom="713">713</date>), nearly two
       centuries after the reign of Justin I., in which Theodorus is usually placed. Another extract
       notices statues of the daughter and niece of the empress Sophia, wife of Justin II., which
       also implies the writer to have lived long after the time of Justin I. Though there seems no
       decisive reason for identifying the writer on the statues with the ecclesiastical historian,
       yet the name and title render their identity not improbable : and it may be observed that
       Damascenus, the earliest writer who has mentioned Theodore, belongs to a period somewhat
       later than the reign of Philippicus [<hi rend="smallcaps">DAMASCENUS</hi>].</p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Vales. <hi rend="ital">Praefatio ad Theodoretum, &amp;c. ;</hi> Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist.
        Litt.</hi> ad ann. 518, vol. i. p. 503; Dupin, <hi rend="ital">Nouvelle Biblioth. des
        Auteurs Eccles.</hi> vol. iv. (6me siècle) p. 92, 2d ed. Paris, 1698; Ceillier, <hi rend="ital">Auteurs Sacrés,</hi> vol. xvi. p. 187, &amp;c.; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Graec.</hi> vol. vii. pp. 368, 435, &amp;c., vol. x. p. 398; Schoell, <hi rend="ital">Hist. de la Litterature Grecque Profane,</hi> vol. vii. p. 26, 2d ed. Paris,
       1825.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>