<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:R.rufinus_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:R.rufinus_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="R"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="rufinus-bio-2" n="rufinus_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Rufi'nus</surname></persName></head><p>literary.</p><p>1. <hi rend="smallcaps">TYRANNIUS</hi> or <hi rend="smallcaps">TURRANIUS</hi>, or <hi rend="smallcaps">TORANUS</hi>, as the name is variously written, must have been born about
      the middle of the fourth century, but neither the precise date nor the place of his nativity
      can be determined with certainty, although some of his biographers have confidently fixed upon
       <date when-custom="345">A. D. 345</date>, for the former, and Concordia, near the head of the
      Adriatic, as the latter. After he had attained to manhood he became an inmate of the monastery
      at Aquileia, where, upon acquiring a knowledge of the principles and rites of Christianity, he
      received the sacrament of baptism, in 371 or 372, from the hands of the presbyter Chromatius.
      At this epoch also he formed that close intimacy with Hieronymus which was long maintained
      with great mutual warmth, but eventually most rudely dissolved. Having conceived an eager
      desire to visit Palestine, Rufinus set out, almost immediately after his admission into the
      Church, for Syria, in the train of Melania, a noble, wealthy, and devout Roman matron, and
      remained in the East for about twenty-six years, passing a portion of his time at Alexandria,
      where he enjoyed the instructions of Didymus and other learned fathers; and the rest at
      Jerusalem, where he took up his abode with the monks on the Mount of Olives, making frequent
      excursions, however, in different directions, in company with Melania, to whom he seems to
      have acted as spiritual adviser and almoner. During the earlier part of the above period he
      maintained a most affectionate correspondence with Jerome, who had retired to the desert
      between Antioch and the Euphrates, and although they met once only (in 385), their friendship
      continued uninterrupted up to 393, when bitter strife arose. Both had been warm admirers of
      Origen, and this admiration had been expressed in the most emphatic terms by Jerome, in the
      preface to his translation of the Homilies upon the Song of Solomon. But when the doubtful
      tendency of many of the theories involved in the imaginative orientalisms of Origen began by
      degrees to be more clearly discerned, and when the cry of heresy, first raised by Theophilus,
      became loud and strong, Jerome, eager to escape all suspicion of adherence to such errors,
      vehemently supported Epiphanius, bishop of Salamis, in his attack upon John of Jerusalem, by
      whom Rufinus had been ordained a presbyter, and to whom he was warmly attached. The seeds of
      enmity planted by this controversy were cherished into vigour by the characteristic heat of
      Jerome, whose denunciations of his fonner companion became, by quick degrees, more and more
      fierce and unsparing; but before the quarrel had ripened into inextinguishable hatred, its
      progress was checked by the interposition and explanations of honest friends, and a solemn
      reconciliation took place at Jersalem, on Easter day, <date when-custom="397">A. D. 397</date>.</p><p>In the autumn of the same year Rufinus embarked for Italy, along with Melania, and having
      been hospitably entertained by Paulinus [<hi rend="smallcaps">PAULINUS</hi>], at Nola, betook
      himself from thence, without visiting the metropolis, to the monastery of Pinetum. Hither
      multitudes flocked for the purpose of making inquiries with regard to the ceremonies and
      liturgies of the sister Churches of the East, the rules of the most celebrated coenobitical
      fraternities, the Greek ecclesiastical writers, and various other points upon which one who
      had been so long resident in Asia and Egypt would be capable of imparting information. The
      intelligence thus obtained proved so interesting, that the learned traveller was earnestly
      solicited to gratify curiosity still further, by translating into Latin some of those
      productions to which he had been in the habit of referring most frequently. With this request,
      not foreseeing the storm he was about to excite, he willingly complied, and accordingly
      published translations of the Apology for Origen by Pamphilus. and of the books of Origen
       <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ ἀρχῶν</foreign>, together with an original tract <hi rend="ital">De Adulteratione Librorum Origenis,</hi> while in the preface to the <title>De
       Principiis,</title> either from a wish to avoid any misconception of his own views, or from
      some feeling of lurking malice, he quoted the panegyric pronounced by Jerome upon Origen, of
      which we have made mention above. The appearance of these works produced a violent ferment.
      Pammachius and Oceanus represented the transaction in the most unfavorable light to Jerome,
      whose wrath blazed forth more hotly than ever; all attempts to bring about a better
      understanding served only, from the bad faith of the negotiators, to feed the flame; a bitter
      correspondence followed, which was crowned by the <title>Apologia</title> of the one <hi rend="ital">ad versus Hieronymam,</hi> and the <title>Apologia</title> of the other <hi rend="ital">ad versus Rufinum.</hi></p><p>Soon after the commencement of the dispute Rufinus retired to Aquileia, and during the life
      of Siricius, was steadily supported by the pontifical court. But, upon the elevation of
      Anastasius, he was summoned by the new pope to repair to Rome, for the purpose of answering
      the charges preferred against his orthodoxy : this mandate, however, he evaded, and, instead
      of appearing in person, transmitted an <hi rend="ital">Apologia,</hi> in which he explains his
      real views, and altogether disavows any participation in the dangerous doctrines imputed to
      him by his enemies. Anastasius replied by an epistle, in which he condemned, most
      unequivocally,the tenets of Origen, and censured indirectly the rashness of his translator,
      without, however, seeking further to disturb him in his retreat. After the death of Anastasius
      in 402, the flames which had raged furiously for upwards of three years, gradually became more
      faint, and at length expired altogether, Rufinus <pb n="667"/> remaining at Aquileia, under
      the protection of Chromatius, busily employed in literary labours, until <date when-custom="408">A.
       D. 408</date>, when he returned to Pinetum. From thence, upon the invasion of Italy by
      Alaric, he fled to Sicily, where he died soon after, in 410. In allusion to the place of his
      decease, his great adversary, whose hostility endured beyond the grave, composed the following
      epitaph :-- "Scorpius inter Enceladum et Porphyrium Trinacriae humo ponitur."</p><div><head>Works</head><p>The extant works of Rufinus must be separated into two classes :-- A. Original
       Compositions, and, B. Translations from the Greek, those belonging to the latter division
       being the more voluminous.</p><div><head>A. Original Compositions</head><div><head>I. <title xml:lang="la">De Adulteratione Librortum Origenis</title></head><p>A sort of <title xml:lang="la">Epilogus</title> or supplement to the translation of the
         Apology for Origen by Pamphilus. It is dedicated to a monk Macarius, at whose urgent
         request that translation was undertaken, and is intended to prove that many of the false
         doctrines ascribed to Origen did not in reality proceed from that father, but were
         deductions from corruptions and interpolations of his genuine text.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>This tract will be found appended to the Apology in the fifth volume of the
           Benedictine edition of Jerome.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>II. <title xml:lang="la">De Benedictionibus XII. Patriarchrorum Libri
         II.</title></head><p> an attempt to interpret the prophecy of Jacob regarding the destinies of his sons,
         contained in the forty-ninth chapter of Genesis.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>This piece will be found under its best form in the edition of Rufinus commenced
           by <title xml:lang="la">Vallarsi,</title>but not continued beyond the first volume, which
           appeared at Verona, fol. 1745.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>III. <title xml:lang="la">Apologia pro Fide sua ad Anastasiunm Pontificem.</title> and
         IV. <title xml:lang="la">Apologia s. Invectivarurm in Hieronymum Libri II.</title></head><p>In these two polemical pieces Rufinus seeks, in the first place, to establish his own
         orthodoxy beyond suspicion, and in the second place, to rebut and retort the injurious
         statements of his opponents, especially of Jerome, whom he imitates too closely in violence
         and want of charity. </p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>Both will be found in the Benedictine edition of Hieronymus, and in that of
           Vallarsi.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>V. <title xml:lang="la">Historia Eremiticca, s. Vitae Patrum</title></head><p>The biographies of thirty-three holy men, who passed a life of sanctity and solitude in
         the desert of Nitria. The collection was long ascribed to Jerome, and when, from the words
         of Jerome himself, this was proved to be impossible, it was assigned to various authors by
         different critics : but, from a passage in the <title>Historia Ecclesiastica</title> (11.4,
         see below), it is evident that Rufinus must be regarded either as the compiler of the
         lives, or as the translator from some Greek original. </p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The best edition is that by <title xml:lang="la">Rostveyd,</title> fol. Antv.
           1615, reprinted fol. Lugdun. 1617, and fol. Antv. 1628.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>VI. <title xml:lang="la">Expositio Symboli</title></head><p> An explanation of the Apostles' Creed. </p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>It is contained in the first volume of the edition of Rufinus commenced by
           Vallarsi, fol. Veron. 1745.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>VII. <title xml:lang="la">Historiae Ecclesiasticae Libri XI</title></head><p> This work belongs partly to the first and partly to the second of the two divisions laid
         down above, since the first nine books are a loose translation of the ten books of the
         Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius, while the tenth and eleventh are a continuation by
         Rufinus himself, embracing a history of the Church, from the commencement of the Arian
         heresy down to the death of Theodosius. </p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The best edition is that by <hi rend="ital">Cacciari,</hi> 2 vols. 4to. Rom.
           1740.</bibl></p></div></div></div><div><head>B. Translations from the Greek</head><div><head>I. <title xml:lang="la">Basilii Magni Regula,</title></head><p> </p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>inserted in the <title>Codex Regularum,</title> &amp;c. of Holstenius, 4to. Rom.
           1661, reprinted at Vienna, fol. 1759.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>II. <title xml:lang="la">Basilii Magni Homiliae VIII.</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>These will be found in the edition of St. Basil, published at Paris by Gamier, in
           1722, vol. ii. p. 713.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>III. <title xml:lang="la">Pamphili Apologia pro Origene</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>to be found in all the best editions of Origen and Jerome.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>IV. <title xml:lang="la">Origenis de Principiis Libri IV.</title>and V. <title xml:lang="la">Origenis Homiliae, XVII. in Genesim., XIII. in Exodum, XVI. in Leviticum,
          XXVIII. in Numeros, XXVI. in Josue, IX. in Judices, I. in I. Librum Regum, IV. in Cantica
          Canticorum, X. Libri in Epistolam Pauli ad Romanos.</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The whole of the above translations will be found in all the editions of
           Origen.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>VI. <title xml:lang="la">Gregorii Nazianzeni Opuscula X.,</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>first published by <title xml:lang="la">Johannes Adelphus,</title> at Strasburg,
           4to., 1508, and included in the Latin translation of the whole works of Gregory, by
           Mosellanus and Pirckheimerus, printed at Leipzig, 8vo. 1522.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>VII. <title xml:lang="la">Sixti Sententiae s. Enchiridium s. Annulus,</title></head><p> a series of moral Apophthegms, the author of which was altogether uncertain, even in the
         age of Rufinus, since by some they were supposed to be the production of Sextius the Stoic,
         named by Seneca, by others of a Pythagorean, by others of Sixtus II., who was bishop of
         Rome, and suffered martyrdom in <date when-custom="258">A. D. 258</date>. A collection of this
         nature is peculiarly open to interpolation, and hence it is little surprising that the MSS.
         should present variations quite irreconcileable. It is not improbable that the reflections
         of some heathen philosopher may have formed the groundwork, that these were modified and
         adapted to Christianity by Rufinus and others, and that transcribers from time to time made
         such alterations and additions as suited their own views and tastes.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The best edition is that of Urbanus Godofredus Siberus, 4to. Lips.
          1725.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>VIII. <title xml:lang="la">Evagrii Sententiae ad Monachos</title>, <title xml:lang="la">Evagrii Sententiae de Apathia</title>, <title xml:lang="la">Evagrii Liber ad
          Virgines.</title></head><p>These three tracts are generally believed to be the "Opuscula" of Evagrius which Jerome,
         in his letter to Ctesiphon, mentions as having been translated by Rufinus, and to which
         Gennadius also makes allusions (cc. xi. and xvii.), although doubtfully and
         indistinctly.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>These three tracts will be found in the appendix to the <title>Codex
            Regularum.</title> &amp;c., of Holstenius, 4to. Rom. 1661, </bibl></p></div></div><div><head>IX. <title xml:lang="la">Clementis Romani Recognitiones,</title></head><p>of which the original was attributed to Clemens Romanus. [<hi rend="smallcaps">CLEMENS</hi>
         <hi rend="smallcaps">ROMANUS.</hi>]</p></div><div><head>X. <title xml:lang="la">Anatolii Alexandrini Canon Paschalis,</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>first published, front a MS., by Aegidius Bucherius, in his <title xml:lang="la">De Doctrina Temporum,</title> fol. Antv. 1634.</bibl></p></div></div></div><div><head>Translations from Origen frequently ascribed to Rufinus</head><p>The following translations from Origen frequently ascribed to Rufinus, are of doubtful
        authenticity : -- <title xml:lang="la">Homiliae VII. in Matthaeum</title>; <title xml:lang="la">Homilia in Johannem</title>; <title xml:lang="la">De Maria Maria Magdalena;
         De Epiphania Domini.</title></p></div><div><head>Works erroneously ascribed to Rufinus</head><p>The following works have been erroneously ascribed to Rufinus : -- <title xml:lang="la">Versio Origenis Homiliarum in Lucamn,</title> which belongs to Jerome; <title xml:lang="la">Versio Josephi Operum,</title> which belongs to Ambrose; <title xml:lang="la">Commentarii in LXXV. priores Davidis Psalmos</title>; <title xml:lang="la">in Oseamn,
         Joteltem, Amnos</title>; <title xml:lang="la">Vita S. Eutgeniae</title>; <title xml:lang="la">Libellus de Fide brevior</title>; <title xml:lang="la">Libellus de Fide
         fusior.</title></p></div><div><head>Lost Works</head><p>The following works by Rufinus have been lost : <title xml:lang="la">Epistola ad
         Hierotymum,</title> in reply to the first part of Jerome's Apologia; <title xml:lang="la">Epistolae ad Aniciam</title>
        <pb n="668"/>
        <title xml:lang="la">Falconiam Probam ;</title> some translations from Latin into Greek.</p></div><div><head>Assessment</head><p>The style of Rufinus is remarkably perspicuous, and, although tinged with the corruptions
        of his age, is far removed from barbarism. His original works do not indicate commanding
        genius, nor indeed are the subjects such as to admit of much display, while his merits as a
        translator rank very low, since all his efforts in this department are characterised by
        extreme inaccuracy. Indeed his object seems to have been rather to convey a general idea of
        the meaning of an author than faithfully to represent his words, and he does not hesitate to
        expand, condense, correct, or omit such passages as seemed to him obscure, diffuse,
        inaccurate or unnecessary, although we cannot with justice accuse him of wilful distortion
        or suppression. Into the merits of the controversy with Jerome, to which perhaps he owes his
        chief celebrity. it is unnecessary to enter. It redounded to the praise of neither party,
        but the latter was undoubtedly the aggressor, the motives of the attack were probably
        unworthy, and the coarse invective in which it was couched excites no feeling except
        disgust, especially when contrasted with the hyperbolical praises lavished by him not long
        before upon the same individual.</p><p>No complete impression of the works of Rufinus having ever been published, we have noticed
        the best edition of each piece separately.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>The events connected with the life of Rufinus have been investigated, with great industry
       and learning, by Giusto Fontanini, archbiship of Ancyra, in his <title xml:lang="la">Historia
        Literaria Aquileiensis,</title> 4to. Rom. 1742, and by J. F. B. Maria de Rubeis, in his
        <title xml:lang="la">Dissertationes Duae,</title> 4to., Venet. 1745; to which we may add the
       notices prefixed to the edition by Cacciari of the <title>Historia Ecclesiastica,</title> and
       the recent dissertation bv J. H. Marzuttini, entitled <title xml:lang="la">De Turanii Rufini
        Presbyteri Aquileiensis Fide et Religione,</title> 8vo. Patav. 1835; see also Schröck,
        <hi rend="ital">Kirchengeschichte,</hi> vol. x. p. 121; Schönemann, <hi rend="ital">Bill. Patrum Latt.</hi> vol. 1.27; Bähr, <hi rend="ital">Geschichte der Röm.
        Litterat.</hi> suppl. Band. 2te Abtheil. § § 95-98.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>