<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:O.optatus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:O.optatus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="O"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="optatus-bio-1" n="optatus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Opta'tus</surname></persName></head><p>bishop of Milevi in Numidia, and hence distinguished by the epithet <hi rend="ital">Milevitanus,</hi> flourished under the emperors Valentinian and Valens, and must have been
      alive at least as late as <hi rend="smallcaps">A. D</hi>. 384, if the passage (2.3) be genuine
      in which mention is made of pope Siricius, who in that year succeeded Damasus in the Roman
      see. Of his personal history we know nothing except that he was by birth a gentile, and that
      he is classed by St. Augustine with Cyprian, Lactantius, Victorinus, and Hilarius, as one who
      came forth from Egypt (<hi rend="ital">i.e.</hi> from the bondage of paganism) laden with the
      treasures of learning and eloquence.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head><title xml:lang="la">De Schismate Donatistarum adversus Parmenianum</title></head><p>He published a controversial treatise, still extant, entitled <title xml:lang="la">De
         Schismate Donatistarum adversus Parmenianum,</title> comprised, as we gather from the
        introduction and are expressly told by Jerome, in six books. Upon this testimony, which is
        fully confirmed by internal evidence, the seventh book now found in our copies has been
        deservedly pronounced spurious by the best judges, although stme scholars still maintain
        that it ought to be regarded <pb n="40"/> as an appendix added by the author himself upon a
        revision of his work. It is certainly not a modern forgery, and was very probably composed,
        as Dupin suggests, by some African, as a supplement, not long after the publication of the
        original.</p><p>Optatus addresses his production to Parmenianus, the Donatist bishop of Carthage, in reply
        to an attack made by that prelate upon the Catholics, anl explains at the outset the method
        he intends to pursue in refuting his opponent. The object of the nrst book is, to ascertain
        what class of persons by justly b branded as traditors and schismatics, the former being the
        term uniformly applied by the Donatists to their antagonists; of the second, to ascertain
        what the Church is, and where it is to be found; of the third, to prove that some acts of
        violence and cruelty on the part of the soldiery had not been committed by the orders or
        with the approbation of the Catholics; of the fourth, to point out who is really to be
        accounted the Sinner, whose sacrifice God rejects, from whose unction we must flee; of the
        fifth, to inquire into the nature of baptism; of the sixth, to expose the errors and
        projects of the Donatists. This performance was long held in such high estimation on account
        of the learning, acuteness, and orthodoxy displayed, not only in reference to the particular
        points under discussion, but upon many general questions of doctrine and discipline, that
        the author was esteemed worthy of the honours of canonization, his festival being celebrated
        on the fourth of June. Even now the book must be regarded as a valuable contribution to the
        ecclesiastical history of the fourth century, and constitutes our principal source of
        information with regard to the origin and progress of the heresy which distracted Africa for
        three hundred years. [<hi rend="smallcaps">DONATUS.</hi>] The language is tolerably pure,
        and the style is for the most part lofty and energetic, but not unfrequently becomes turgid
        and harsh, while it is uniformly destitute of all grace or polish. The allegorical
        interpretations of Scripture constantly introduced are singularly fantastic, and the
        sentiments expressed with regard to free-will would in modern times be pronounced decidedly
        Arminian. Optatus refers in the course of his arguments (1.14) to certain state papers and
        other public documents, which he had subjoined in support of the statements contained in the
        body of the work. These have disappeared, but in the best editions we find a copious and
        important collection of "pieces justificatives," collected from various sources, which throw
        much curious light not only upon the struggles of the Donatists, but upon the practice of
        ancient courts and the forms of ancient diplomacy.</p></div><div><head>Other works</head><p>Of the epistles and other pieces noticed by Trithemius no trace remains.</p></div></div><div><head>Editions</head><p>The Editio Princeps of the six books of Optatus was printed by <bibl>F. Behem (<hi rend="ital">apud S. Victorem rope Moguntiam</hi>), fol. 1549, under the inspection of
        Joannes Cochlaeus, from a MS. belonging to the Hospital of St. Nicolas near
        Trèves.</bibl>
       <bibl>The text which here appears under a very corrupt and mutilated form was corrected in a
        multitude of passages by Balduinus, first from a single new MS. (Paris, 8vo. 1653, with the
        seventh book added in small type)</bibl>, and afterwards from two additional codices
        <bibl>(Paris, 8vo. 1659)</bibl>. The second of these impressions remained the standard until
       the appearance of the elaborate edition by <bibl>Dupin, printed at Paris, fol. 1700,
        reprinted at Amsterdam, fol. 1701, and at Antwerp, fol. 1702, the last being in point of
        arrangement the best of the three, which are very far superior to all others.</bibl> That of
        <bibl>Meric Casaubon (8vo. Lond. 1631) is of no particular value</bibl>, that of
        <bibl>L'Aubespine, bishop of Orleans (fol. Par. 1631) is altogether worthless</bibl>.
        <bibl>Galland, in his <title xml:lang="la">Bibliotheca Patrum,</title> vol. v. p. 462 (fol.
        Venet. 1769)</bibl>, has followed the text of Dupin, selected the most important of his
       critical notes, adopted his distribution of the "Monumenta Vetera ad Donatistarum Historiam
       pertinentia," and brought together much useful matter in his Prolegomena, cap. xviii. p.
       xxix.</p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Hieronym. <hi rend="ital">de Viris Ill.</hi> 110 ; Honor. 1.3; Trithem. 76; Augustin. <hi rend="ital">de Doctrin.</hi>
       <hi rend="ital">Christ.</hi> 2.40; Lardner, <hi rend="ital">Credibility of Gospel
        History,</hi> c. cv.; Funceius, <hi rend="ital">de L. L. veget. Senect.</hi> c. 10.56-63;
       Schönemann, <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Patr. Lat.</hi> vol. 1.16; Bähr, <hi rend="ital">Geschichte der Röm. Litt.</hi> suppl. band. 2te Abtheil. § 65.</p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>