<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.middias_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.middias_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="M"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="middias-bio-2" n="middias_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Mi'ddias</surname></persName></head><p>2. An Athenian, of considerable wealth and influence, was a violent and bitter enemy of
      Demosthenes, the orator. His hostility he first displayed when he broke violently into the
      house of Demosthenes, with his brother Thrasylochus, to take possession of it,--Thrasylochus
      having offered, in the case of a trierarchy, to make an exchange of property with Demosthenes
       (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀντίδοσις</foreign>; see <hi rend="ital">Dict. of Ant. s.
       v.</hi>), under a private understanding with the guardians of the latter that, if the
      exchange were effected, the suit then pending against them should be dropped. (Dem. <hi rend="ital">c. Meid.</hi> p. 540, <hi rend="ital">c. Aphob.</hi> p. 841; Böckh, <hi rend="ital">Publ. Econ. of Athens,</hi> bk. iv. ch. 16.) The opposition offered by
      Demosthenes, though to no purpose, to the proposal for sending aid against Callias and
      Taurosthenes of Chalcis to Plutarchus, the tyrant of Eretria, and the friend of Meidias, no
      doubt further exasperated the hatred of the latter, and lie not only assailed Demosthenes with
      a charge of neglect of military duty (<foreign xml:lang="grc">λειποταξίου δίκη</foreign>),
      but endeavoured also, with the grossest malice, to implicate him in the accusation of
      murdering one Nicodemus. (Aesch. <hi rend="ital">c. Ctes.</hi> pp. 65, 66; Dem. <hi rend="ital">De Pac.</hi> p. 58, <hi rend="ital">c. Meid.</hi> pp. 547-554.) For the remainder
      of the transactions between Demosthenes and Meidias, see above, Vol. I. pp. 982, 983, and
      comp. Clint. <hi rend="ital">F. H.</hi> vol. ii. sub annis 350, 348, App. ch. 20.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>